Nowak Joanna, Kaczmarek Mariusz K
Faculty of Mechatronics, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-074 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;17(17):4233. doi: 10.3390/ma17174233.
Measurements of the properties of soft materials are important from the point of view of medical diagnostics of soft tissues as well as testing the quality of food products and many technical materials. One of the frequently used techniques for testing such materials, attractive due to its non-invasive nature, is the indentation technique, which does not puncture the material. The difficulty of testing soft materials, which affects the objectivity of the results, is related to the problems of stable positioning of the studied material in relation to the indentation apparatus, especially with a device held by the operator. This work concerns the comparison of test results using an indentation apparatus mounted on mobile and stationary handles. The tested materials are cylindrical samples of polyurethane foams with three different stiffnesses and the same samples with a 0.5 or 1 mm thick silicone layer. The study presented uses an apparatus with a flat cylindrical indenter, with a surface area of 1 cm, pressed to a depth of 10 mm (so-called deep tests). Based on the recorded force changes over time, five descriptors of the indentation test were determined and compared for both types of handles. The tests performed showed that the elastic properties of foam materials alone and with a silicone layer can be effectively characterized by the maximum forces during recessing and retraction and the slopes of the recessing and retraction curves. In the case of two-layer materials, these descriptors reflect both the characteristics of the foams and the silicone layer. The results show that the above property of the deep indentation method distinguishes it from the shallow indentation method. The repeatability of the tests performed in the mobile and stationary holders were determined to be comparable.
从软组织的医学诊断以及食品和许多技术材料的质量检测角度来看,测量软材料的特性非常重要。一种常用于测试此类材料的技术是压痕技术,因其非侵入性而颇具吸引力,该技术不会刺穿材料。测试软材料的困难影响了结果的客观性,这与被研究材料相对于压痕装置的稳定定位问题有关,尤其是对于由操作员手持的装置而言。这项工作涉及使用安装在移动手柄和固定手柄上的压痕装置进行测试结果的比较。测试材料是具有三种不同刚度的聚氨酯泡沫圆柱形样品以及带有0.5毫米或1毫米厚硅树脂层的相同样品。所展示的研究使用了一个带有扁平圆柱形压头的装置,其表面积为1平方厘米,压入深度为10毫米(所谓的深度测试)。基于记录的力随时间的变化,确定了压痕测试的五个描述符,并对两种类型的手柄进行了比较。所进行的测试表明,仅泡沫材料以及带有硅树脂层的泡沫材料的弹性特性可以通过压入和回退过程中的最大力以及压入和回退曲线的斜率有效地表征。对于两层材料,这些描述符既反映了泡沫的特性,也反映了硅树脂层的特性。结果表明,深度压痕方法的上述特性使其有别于浅度压痕方法。在移动和固定夹具中进行的测试的可重复性被确定为具有可比性。