• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电动公交车中磁通密度和射频电磁场暴露的综合分析:以土耳其萨姆松为例

Comprehensive Analysis of Magnetic Flux Density and RF-EMF Exposure in Electric Buses: A Case Study from Samsun, Turkey.

作者信息

Albayrak Zafer Emre, Kurnaz Cetin, Karadag Teoman, Cheema Adnan Ahmad

机构信息

Mechanical, Electrical, and Lighting Branch, Department of Public Works, Samsun Metropolitan Municipality, Samsun 55200, Türkiye.

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun 55139, Türkiye.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;24(17):5634. doi: 10.3390/s24175634.

DOI:10.3390/s24175634
PMID:39275545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11397961/
Abstract

This study investigates magnetic flux density (B) and radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) measurements on electric buses operating in Samsun, Turkey, focusing on two bus routes (called E1 and E4) during the morning and evening hours. Measurements were taken under diverse operational conditions, including acceleration, cruising, and braking, at locations of peak passenger density. Along the E1 route, the magnetic field intensity varied significantly based on the bus position, road slope, and passenger load, with notable increases during braking. In contrast, the E4 route showed a lower magnetic field intensity and RF-EMF values due to its straighter trajectory and reduced operational stops. The highest RF-EMF measurement recorded was 6.01 V/m, which is below the maximum levels established by the ICNIRP guidelines. In 11 out of the 12 different band-selective RF-EMF measurements, the highest contribution came from the downlink band of the base stations, while in only one measurement, the highest contribution originated from the uplink bands of the base stations. All data were subject to the Anderson-Darling test, confirming the generalized extreme value distribution as the best fit for both B and RF-EMF measurements. Additionally, the study assessed B levels inside and outside the bus during charging, revealing heightened readings near the pantograph. These findings significantly contribute to our understanding of electromagnetic field exposure in electric bus environments, highlighting potential health implications and informing the development of targeted mitigation strategies.

摘要

本研究调查了在土耳其萨姆松运营的电动公交车上的磁通密度(B)和射频电磁场(RF - EMF),重点关注了两条公交线路(称为E1和E4)在早晚高峰时段的情况。在不同的运行条件下进行了测量,包括加速、巡航和制动,测量地点为乘客密度高峰处。沿着E1线路,磁场强度根据公交车位置、道路坡度和乘客负载有显著变化,在制动时显著增加。相比之下,E4线路由于其轨迹更直且运营站点减少,显示出较低的磁场强度和RF - EMF值。记录到的最高RF - EMF测量值为6.01 V/m,低于国际非电离辐射防护委员会(ICNIRP)指南规定的最高水平。在12次不同的频段选择性RF - EMF测量中,有11次最高贡献来自基站的下行链路频段,而只有一次测量中,最高贡献来自基站的上行链路频段。所有数据都经过了安德森 - 达林检验,证实广义极值分布最适合B和RF - EMF测量。此外,该研究评估了充电期间公交车内外的B水平,发现在受电弓附近读数升高。这些发现极大地有助于我们理解电动公交车环境中的电磁场暴露情况,突出了潜在的健康影响,并为制定有针对性的缓解策略提供了信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/a240732a1622/sensors-24-05634-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/55545b7a6732/sensors-24-05634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/de4c177a7369/sensors-24-05634-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/8ac6125c31b8/sensors-24-05634-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/bdd2f6d5813a/sensors-24-05634-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/622fe9b97d2d/sensors-24-05634-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/e535c579f6b7/sensors-24-05634-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/3191cdc8e46d/sensors-24-05634-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/015d987dd3e2/sensors-24-05634-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/7820f5e289df/sensors-24-05634-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/ed599bf83f7a/sensors-24-05634-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/f3199157e5a7/sensors-24-05634-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/6adbd5949808/sensors-24-05634-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/8ce4b7ad5df4/sensors-24-05634-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/486fa5604e46/sensors-24-05634-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/d2f16d7b27b3/sensors-24-05634-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/8ef8c1b1d652/sensors-24-05634-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/145921fef50f/sensors-24-05634-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/3391ed9131fc/sensors-24-05634-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/04c3b6925503/sensors-24-05634-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/ac4a60fac916/sensors-24-05634-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/5cdd8bd530e0/sensors-24-05634-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/a240732a1622/sensors-24-05634-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/55545b7a6732/sensors-24-05634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/de4c177a7369/sensors-24-05634-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/8ac6125c31b8/sensors-24-05634-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/bdd2f6d5813a/sensors-24-05634-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/622fe9b97d2d/sensors-24-05634-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/e535c579f6b7/sensors-24-05634-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/3191cdc8e46d/sensors-24-05634-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/015d987dd3e2/sensors-24-05634-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/7820f5e289df/sensors-24-05634-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/ed599bf83f7a/sensors-24-05634-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/f3199157e5a7/sensors-24-05634-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/6adbd5949808/sensors-24-05634-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/8ce4b7ad5df4/sensors-24-05634-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/486fa5604e46/sensors-24-05634-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/d2f16d7b27b3/sensors-24-05634-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/8ef8c1b1d652/sensors-24-05634-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/145921fef50f/sensors-24-05634-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/3391ed9131fc/sensors-24-05634-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/04c3b6925503/sensors-24-05634-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/ac4a60fac916/sensors-24-05634-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/5cdd8bd530e0/sensors-24-05634-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be97/11397961/a240732a1622/sensors-24-05634-g022.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive Analysis of Magnetic Flux Density and RF-EMF Exposure in Electric Buses: A Case Study from Samsun, Turkey.电动公交车中磁通密度和射频电磁场暴露的综合分析:以土耳其萨姆松为例
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;24(17):5634. doi: 10.3390/s24175634.
2
Exposure assessment of radio frequency electromagnetic field levels in hospitals of Samsun Province, Turkey.土耳其萨姆斯省医院射频电磁场水平的暴露评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(27):34005-34017. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09669-1. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
3
Personal RF-EMF exposure from mobile phone base stations during temporary events.个人在临时事件中来自移动电话基站的射频电磁辐射暴露。
Environ Res. 2019 Aug;175:266-273. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.033. Epub 2019 May 21.
4
Comprehensive radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements and assessments: a city center example.综合射频电磁场测量与评估:以市中心为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 May 7;192(6):334. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08312-3.
5
Use of portable exposimeters to monitor radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in the everyday environment.使用便携式暴露计监测日常环境中的射频电磁场暴露。
Environ Res. 2016 Oct;150:289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
6
Spatial and temporal variability of personal environmental exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in children in Europe.欧洲儿童个人环境射频电磁场暴露的时空变异性。
Environ Int. 2018 Aug;117:204-214. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 May 10.
7
Assessment of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure from personal measurements considering the body shadowing effect in Korean children and parents.考虑到韩国儿童和家长的体影效应,从个人测量评估射频电磁场暴露。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 15;627:1544-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.318. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Personal exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields in Europe: Is there a generation gap?欧洲人群的射频电磁辐射暴露:存在代际差异吗?
Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 1):216-226. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
9
Comparison of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure levels in different everyday microenvironments in an international context.在国际背景下比较不同日常微环境中的射频电磁场暴露水平。
Environ Int. 2018 May;114:297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.02.036. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
Personal Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields among Australian Adults.澳大利亚成年人的射频电磁辐射个人暴露水平。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 12;15(10):2234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102234.

本文引用的文献

1
Study on the safety assessment and protection design of human exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields in electric vehicles.电动汽车中人体低频磁场暴露的安全评估与防护设计研究。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2023 Dec 29;200(1):60-74. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncad269.
2
Statistical Characterization and Modeling of Indoor RF-EMF Down-Link Exposure.室内射频电磁场下行链路暴露的统计特征描述与建模。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;23(7):3583. doi: 10.3390/s23073583.
3
RF-EMF Exposure near 5G NR Small Cells.5G NR 小基站附近的射频电磁辐射暴露
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 15;23(6):3145. doi: 10.3390/s23063145.
4
Assessment of the Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure at EV Charging Facilities.电动汽车充电站的电磁辐射暴露评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;23(1):162. doi: 10.3390/s23010162.
5
Complex Electromagnetic Issues Associated with the Use of Electric Vehicles in Urban Transportation.城市交通中使用电动汽车所涉及的复杂电磁问题。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 22;22(5):1719. doi: 10.3390/s22051719.
6
Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).电磁场暴露限制导则(100 kHz 至 300 GHz)。
Health Phys. 2020 May;118(5):483-524. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001210.
7
Very-low-frequency and low-frequency electric and magnetic fields associated with electric shuttle bus wireless charging.与电动穿梭巴士无线充电相关的极低频和低频电场和磁场。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014 Jan;158(2):123-34. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nct208. Epub 2013 Sep 15.
8
Systematic review on the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations.移动电话基站射频电磁辐射暴露的健康影响的系统评价。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Dec 1;88(12):887-896F. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.071852. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
9
Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz).限制暴露于时变电场和磁场(1赫兹至100千赫兹)的指南。
Health Phys. 2010 Dec;99(6):818-36. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c86.
10
Comparison of personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in different urban areas across Europe.比较欧洲不同城市的个人射频电磁场暴露情况。
Environ Res. 2010 Oct;110(7):658-63. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2010.06.009.