Castagna Peter J, Babinski Dara E, Waschbusch Daniel A
Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, 368C Gordon Palmer Hall, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Penn State Hershey Medical Center and College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May;34(5):1545-1555. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02582-9. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
The presence of callous-unemotional (CU) traits may not be unique to conduct disorder (CD) but also extend to oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). While a distinct neurocognitive profile characterizes CU traits, it remains unclear whether this CU-related neurocognitive profile differs between youth with CD and ODD. This study investigated whether CU traits moderate the relationship between inhibitory control and CD or ODD symptoms. We leveraged computational modeling to decompose task-based inhibitory control in a sample of 200 children (59.5% boys, 86.5% Caucasian), aged 8 to 15 years (M = 10.10, SD = 1.88), referred to an outpatient child diagnostic clinic focused on externalizing problems. Analyses examined whether CU traits moderated the relationship between inhibitory control and CD or ODD symptoms while controlling for ADHD symptoms and child demographics. The results indicated that the strength of the relationship between inhibitory control and CD and ODD symptoms varies as a function of CU traits. Specifically, CD was linked to a more cautious decision-making style when elevated CU traits were present, whereas ODD was associated with more efficient decision making. These findings suggest distinct neurocognitive profiles based on CU traits, which vary between CD and ODD. Clinically, this underscores the importance of tailoring interventions for CD-CU and ODD-CU, focusing on decision making processes rather than merely addressing impulsivity. This research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the interaction between neurocognitive processes and disruptive behavior, with significant implications for both theoretical models and treatment approaches.
冷酷无情(CU)特质的存在可能并非品行障碍(CD)所特有,而是也延伸至对立违抗障碍(ODD)。虽然独特的神经认知特征是CU特质的特点,但尚不清楚这种与CU相关的神经认知特征在患有CD和ODD的青少年中是否存在差异。本研究调查了CU特质是否调节抑制控制与CD或ODD症状之间的关系。我们利用计算模型对200名8至15岁(M = 10.10,SD = 1.88)儿童(59.5%为男孩,86.5%为白种人)的样本中基于任务的抑制控制进行分解,这些儿童被转诊至一家专注于外化问题的儿童门诊诊断诊所。分析在控制注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状和儿童人口统计学特征的同时,检验了CU特质是否调节抑制控制与CD或ODD症状之间的关系。结果表明,抑制控制与CD和ODD症状之间关系的强度因CU特质而异。具体而言,当CU特质升高时,CD与更谨慎的决策风格相关,而ODD则与更高效的决策相关。这些发现表明,基于CU特质存在不同的神经认知特征,在CD和ODD之间存在差异。在临床上,这凸显了为患有CD-CU和ODD-CU的患者量身定制干预措施的重要性,应侧重于决策过程而非仅仅解决冲动问题。本研究有助于更细致地理解神经认知过程与破坏性行为之间的相互作用,对理论模型和治疗方法都具有重要意义。