Choi Joon Young, Lee Chang-Hoon, Joo Hyonsoo, Sim Yun Su, Lee Jaechun, Lee Hyun, Yoo Kwang Ha, Park Seoung Ju, Na Ju Ock, Khor Yet Hong
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Chest. 2025 Feb;167(2):414-424. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.048. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
Accurate spirometry interpretation is critical in the diagnosis and management of COPD. With increasing efforts for a unified approach by the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI), this study evaluated the application of race-specific 2012 GLI and race-neutral 2022 GLI reference equations compared with Choi's reference equations, which are derived and widely used in South Korea, for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD.
What are the effects of applying race-specific 2012 GLI, race-neutral 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations on the diagnosis, severity grade, and clinical outcome associations of COPD?
Serial spirometry data from the Korea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) consisting of 3,477 patients were used for reanalysis using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations. The COPD diagnosis and severity categorization, associations with disease manifestations and health outcomes, and longitudinal trajectories of lung function were determined.
Although there was strong concordance in COPD diagnosis comparing 2012 GLI, and 2022 GLI reference equations with Choi's reference equations, a notable portion of patients were reclassified to milder disease severity (17.0% and 23.4% for 2012 GLI and 2022 GLI reference equations, respectively). Relationships between FEV % predicted values calculated using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's equations with clinical outcomes including dyspnea severity, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and frequency of exacerbations remain consistently significant. Similar annual decline rates of FEV and FVC % predicted were observed among the reference equations used, except for slower annual decline rate of FEV in Choi's equation compared with 2022 GLI race-neutral equation.
Application of GLI reference equations for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD has potential implications on disease severity grade for clinical management and trial participation, and maintains consistent significant relationships with key disease outcomes.
准确解读肺量计检查结果对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的诊断和管理至关重要。随着全球肺功能倡议组织(GLI)为采用统一方法做出越来越多的努力,本研究评估了种族特异性2012年GLI参考方程和种族中性2022年GLI参考方程与崔氏参考方程(在韩国推导并广泛使用)相比,在东北亚COPD患者肺量计检查结果解读中的应用情况。
应用种族特异性2012年GLI、种族中性2022年GLI和崔氏参考方程对COPD的诊断、严重程度分级及临床结局关联有何影响?
来自韩国慢性阻塞性肺疾病亚组研究(KOCOSS)的3477例患者的系列肺量计检查数据,采用2012年GLI、2022年GLI和崔氏参考方程进行重新分析。确定COPD的诊断和严重程度分类、与疾病表现和健康结局的关联以及肺功能的纵向轨迹。
尽管将2012年GLI和2022年GLI参考方程与崔氏参考方程用于COPD诊断时具有高度一致性,但仍有相当一部分患者被重新分类为疾病严重程度较轻(2012年GLI和2022年GLI参考方程分别为17.0%和23.4%)。使用2012年GLI、2022年GLI和崔氏方程计算的预测FEV%值与包括呼吸困难严重程度、运动能力、健康相关生活质量和急性加重频率在内的临床结局之间的关系始终显著。在所使用的参考方程中,观察到预测的FEV和FVC%的年下降率相似,不过与2022年GLI种族中性方程相比,崔氏方程中FEV的年下降率较慢。
将GLI参考方程应用于东北亚COPD患者的肺量计检查结果解读,可能会对临床管理和试验参与中的疾病严重程度分级产生影响,并与关键疾病结局保持一致的显著关系。