• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创后路颈椎融合术的安全性与有效性:一项单中心、单术者的回顾性研究

Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive posterior cervical fusion: a single center, single surgeon retrospective review.

作者信息

Crabill George A, Derouen Kaleb, Shelvin Kierany B, Wilson John M, Tender Gabriel C

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, LSUHSC New Orleans, 2021 Perdido Street, 8th Floor, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States.

出版信息

J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Sep 15;2024(9):rjae559. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae559. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1093/jscr/rjae559
PMID:39280024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402508/
Abstract

Standard posterior cervical fusion is a common surgical technique that utilizes lateral mass screws and rods for fixation. A relatively new, minimally invasive technique involving interfacet decortication and placement of spacers has shown promise in terms of outcomes. We sought to determine fusion rates and complications of this new technique at our institution to bolster current literature. We retrospectively reviewed all patients that underwent a 3-level or less minimally invasive posterior cervical fusions by a single surgeon. Patients were evaluated to determine fusion rates and postoperative complications. Twenty-eight patients underwent minimally invasive posterior cervical fusion. Twenty-seven demonstrated fusion (96%). One patient that underwent the procedure for juxta-fusional disease required additional surgery for pseudoarthrosis. The minimally invasive posterior cervical technique results in favorable fusion rates and has low complication rates. Our study strengthens current literature that this minimally invasive technique is a safe and effective alternative.

摘要

标准后路颈椎融合术是一种常见的外科技术,它利用侧块螺钉和棒进行固定。一种相对较新的微创技术,包括关节突去皮质和植入间隔物,在治疗效果方面已显示出前景。我们试图在本机构确定这种新技术的融合率和并发症,以充实当前的文献资料。我们回顾性分析了由一名外科医生实施的3节段及以下微创后路颈椎融合术的所有患者。对患者进行评估以确定融合率和术后并发症。28例患者接受了微创后路颈椎融合术。27例实现了融合(96%)。1例因临近融合节段疾病接受该手术的患者因假关节形成需要再次手术。微创后路颈椎技术融合率良好,并发症发生率低。我们的研究进一步证实了当前文献中该微创技术是一种安全有效的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e3/11402508/469ceac5277c/rjae559f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e3/11402508/cb769351a7bc/rjae559f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e3/11402508/469ceac5277c/rjae559f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e3/11402508/cb769351a7bc/rjae559f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6e3/11402508/469ceac5277c/rjae559f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive posterior cervical fusion: a single center, single surgeon retrospective review.微创后路颈椎融合术的安全性与有效性:一项单中心、单术者的回顾性研究
J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Sep 15;2024(9):rjae559. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae559. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.微创外侧椎间融合术治疗无附加椎弓根螺钉固定的上位相邻节段腰椎退变性狭窄症
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):861-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE13841. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
3
Navigated, Percutaneous Posterior Cervical Minimally Invasive Surgery Fixation: Technique and Nuances.导航下经皮后路颈椎微创手术固定:技术与细节
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Oct;16(S2):S8-S13. doi: 10.14444/8271. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
4
Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy.微创后路颈椎椎间孔切开术和显微椎间盘切除术术后的并发症、结局及融合需求
Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.048. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Minimally invasive cervical spine foraminotomy and lateral mass screw placement.微创颈椎侧块螺钉置入术。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):E318-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823a43f9.
6
Anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws: comparison to muscle damage and minimally invasive techniques.经皮椎弓根螺钉前后路腰椎体间融合术:与肌肉损伤和微创手术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):E923-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af0523.
7
Minimally Invasive Direct Thoracic Interbody Fusion (MIS-DTIF): Technical Notes of a Single Surgeon Study.微创直接胸椎椎间融合术(MIS-DTIF):单术者研究的技术要点
Cureus. 2016 Jul 18;8(7):e699. doi: 10.7759/cureus.699.
8
Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Handsome Option.微创颈椎后路融合术:一种不错的选择。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023;135:351-356. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_53.
9
Robot-assisted Percutaneous Transfacet Screw Fixation Supplementing Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Procedure: Accuracy and Safety Evaluation of This Novel Minimally Invasive Technique.机器人辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉固定辅助斜外侧椎间融合术:这种新型微创技术的准确性和安全性评估
Orthop Surg. 2019 Feb;11(1):25-33. doi: 10.1111/os.12428. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
10
Lateral mass screw fixation in the cervical spine: a systematic literature review.颈椎侧块螺钉固定:系统文献回顾。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 4;95(23):2136-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01522.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrospective evaluation of cervical fusion with DTRAX (R) cervical cage.使用DTRAX(R)颈椎椎间融合器进行颈椎融合术的回顾性评估。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):48-54. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_150_21. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Predicting Trends in Cervical Spinal Surgery in the United States from 2020 to 2040.预测 2020 年至 2040 年美国颈椎脊柱手术的趋势。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e175-e181. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.055. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
Outcomes of posterior cervical fusion and decompression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
后路颈椎融合与减压的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2019 Oct;19(10):1714-1729. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 7.
4
Cervical Interfacet Spacers to Promote Indirect Decompression and Enhance Fusion in Degenerative Spine: A Review.颈椎椎间关节融合器促进退行性脊柱间接减压及增强融合:综述
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:447-452. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.114. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
Posterior cervical fusion utilizing cages placed bilaterally in the facets for the treatment of the upper cervical adjacent segment disease in the elderly.双侧小关节面置入椎间融合器的后路颈椎融合术治疗老年人上颈椎相邻节段疾病
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 May;63:149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
6
Length of stay associated with posterior cervical fusion with intervertebral cages: experience from a device registry.颈椎后路椎间融合器融合术的住院时间:来自器械注册库的经验
J Spine Surg. 2018 Jun;4(2):281-286. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.05.27.
7
National Trends in Demographics and Outcomes Following Cervical Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.颈椎病性脊髓病颈椎融合术后的人口统计学和预后的全国趋势。
Global Spine J. 2018 May;8(3):244-253. doi: 10.1177/2192568217722562. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
8
Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery.影响择期颈椎前路和后路手术后住院时间的因素。
Cureus. 2017 Jul 10;9(7):e1452. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1452.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of DTRAX(®) posterior cervical cage stabilization with and without lateral mass fixation.DTRAX(®)颈椎后路椎间融合器在有或无侧块固定情况下的生物力学评估。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Aug 23;9:285-90. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S111031. eCollection 2016.
10
Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.双侧颈椎后路椎间融合器提供生物力学稳定性:对颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术单独及辅助固定的评估
Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Jul 13;9:223-30. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S109588. eCollection 2016.