• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推进来源追踪:粪便中排出的原核生物的系统评价和特定来源基因组数据库管理

Advancing Source Tracking: Systematic Review and Source-Specific Genome Database Curation of Fecally Shed Prokaryotes.

作者信息

Lindner Blake G, Choudhury Rakin A, Pinamang Princess, Bingham Lilia, D'Amico Isabelle, Hatt Janet K, Konstantinidis Konstantinos T, Graham Katherine E

机构信息

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.

School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2024 Aug 7;11(9):931-939. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00233. eCollection 2024 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00233
PMID:39280079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11391576/
Abstract

Advancements within fecal source tracking (FST) studies are complicated by a lack of knowledge regarding the genetic content and distribution of fecally shed microbial populations. To address this gap, we performed a systematic literature review and curated a large collection of genomes (n = 26,018) representing fecally shed prokaryotic species across broad and narrow source categories commonly implicated in FST studies of recreational waters (i.e., cats, dogs, cows, seagulls, chickens, pigs, birds, ruminants, human feces, and wastewater). We find that across these sources the total number of prokaryotic genomes recovered from materials meeting our initial inclusion criteria varied substantially across fecal sources: from none in seagulls to 9,085 in pigs. We examined genome sequences recovered from these metagenomic and isolation-based studies extensively via comparative genomic approaches to characterize trends across source categories and produce a finalized genome database for each source category which is available online (n = 12,730). On average, 81% of the genomes representing species-level populations occur only within a single source. Using fecal slurries to test the performance of each source database, we report read capture rates that vary with fecal source alpha diversity and database size. We expect this resource to be useful to FST-related objectives, One Health research, and sanitation efforts globally.

摘要

粪便源追踪(FST)研究的进展因对粪便中微生物种群的遗传内容和分布缺乏了解而变得复杂。为了填补这一空白,我们进行了系统的文献综述,并精心整理了大量基因组(n = 26,018),这些基因组代表了在娱乐用水FST研究中通常涉及的广泛和狭窄来源类别中粪便排出的原核生物物种(即猫、狗、牛、海鸥、鸡、猪、鸟类、反刍动物、人类粪便和废水)。我们发现,在这些来源中,从符合我们初始纳入标准的材料中回收的原核生物基因组总数在不同粪便来源之间差异很大:从海鸥中没有到猪中有9,085个。我们通过比较基因组方法广泛检查了从这些宏基因组和基于分离的研究中回收的基因组序列,以表征不同来源类别的趋势,并为每个来源类别生成一个最终的基因组数据库,该数据库可在线获取(n = 12,730)。平均而言,代表物种水平种群的基因组中有81%仅出现在单一来源中。使用粪便浆液测试每个来源数据库的性能,我们报告了随粪便来源α多样性和数据库大小而变化的读取捕获率。我们预计这一资源将对全球与FST相关的目标、“同一健康”研究和卫生工作有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/11391576/8f3792036d91/ez4c00233_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/11391576/b0e0b6fb6318/ez4c00233_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/11391576/022260775c18/ez4c00233_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/11391576/d26032ea0e3a/ez4c00233_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/11391576/8f3792036d91/ez4c00233_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/11391576/b0e0b6fb6318/ez4c00233_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/11391576/022260775c18/ez4c00233_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/11391576/d26032ea0e3a/ez4c00233_0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b1/11391576/8f3792036d91/ez4c00233_0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Advancing Source Tracking: Systematic Review and Source-Specific Genome Database Curation of Fecally Shed Prokaryotes.推进来源追踪:粪便中排出的原核生物的系统评价和特定来源基因组数据库管理
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2024 Aug 7;11(9):931-939. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00233. eCollection 2024 Sep 10.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Microbial source tracking in impaired watersheds using PhyloChip and machine-learning classification.利用 PhyloChip 和机器学习分类对受损流域中的微生物源进行追踪。
Water Res. 2016 Nov 15;105:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
4
Microbial source tracking (MST) in Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area: Seasonal and precipitation trends in MST marker concentrations, and associations with E. coli levels, pathogenic marker presence, and land use.微生物源追踪(MST)在查塔胡奇河国家娱乐区:MST 标记浓度的季节性和降水趋势,以及与大肠杆菌水平、病原体标记存在和土地利用的关系。
Water Res. 2020 Mar 15;171:115435. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115435. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
5
6
Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence.采用多种证据链对半定量评估人源和反刍动物源粪便污染潜力。
Water Res. 2011 May;45(10):3225-44. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.037. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
7
Identification of fecal contamination sources of groundwater in rural areas of Vhembe District Municipality, Limpopo Province, South Africa.鉴定南非林波波省威赫姆区农村地下水的粪便污染来源。
Water Environ Res. 2023 Dec;95(12):e10965. doi: 10.1002/wer.10965.
8
Bifidobacteria in feces and environmental waters.粪便和环境水体中的双歧杆菌。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Feb;74(3):575-84. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01221-07. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
9
Microbial Source Tracking of Fecal Indicating Bacteria in Coral Reef Waters, Recreational Waters, and Groundwater of Saipan by Real-Time Quantitative PCR.通过实时定量PCR对塞班岛珊瑚礁水域、娱乐用水和地下水中粪便指示菌进行微生物源追踪
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 18;11:596650. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.596650. eCollection 2020.
10
Sample size, library composition, and genotypic diversity among natural populations of Escherichia coli from different animals influence accuracy of determining sources of fecal pollution.不同动物源大肠杆菌自然种群的样本量、文库组成和基因型多样性会影响粪便污染来源判定的准确性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Aug;70(8):4478-85. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4478-4485.2004.

引用本文的文献

1
SourceApp: A Novel Metagenomic Source Tracking Tool that can Distinguish between Fecal Microbiomes Using Genome-To-Source Associations Benchmarked Against Mixed Input Spike-In Mesocosms.SourceApp:一种新型宏基因组溯源工具,可利用与混合输入加标中宇宙基准的基因组与来源关联来区分粪便微生物群。
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 May 20;59(19):9507-9516. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c03603. Epub 2025 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of animal hosts in shaping gut microbiome variation.动物宿主在塑造肠道微生物组变异中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 May 6;379(1901):20230071. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0071. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
2
Higher pathogen load in children from Mozambique vs. USA revealed by comparative fecal microbiome profiling.通过比较粪便微生物组分析揭示,莫桑比克儿童的病原体载量高于美国儿童。
ISME Commun. 2022 Aug 18;2(1):74. doi: 10.1038/s43705-022-00154-z.
3
Comprehensive Assessment of 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing for Microbiome Profiling across Multiple Habitats.
16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序在多种生境微生物组分析中的综合评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0056323. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00563-23. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
The Gut Microbiome of 54 Mammalian Species.54种哺乳动物的肠道微生物群
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jun 16;13:886252. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.886252. eCollection 2022.
5
Guts of the Urban Ecosystem: Microbial Ecology of Sewer Infrastructure.城市生态系统的核心:污水基础设施的微生物生态学。
mSystems. 2022 Aug 30;7(4):e0011822. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00118-22. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
6
Toward shotgun metagenomic approaches for microbial source tracking sewage spills based on laboratory mesocosms.基于实验室中观模型的宏基因组学方法在微生物溯源污水泄漏中的应用。
Water Res. 2022 Feb 15;210:117993. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117993. Epub 2021 Dec 25.
7
Extensive microbial diversity within the chicken gut microbiome revealed by metagenomics and culture.宏基因组学和培养揭示鸡肠道微生物组中广泛的微生物多样性。
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 6;9:e10941. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10941. eCollection 2021.
8
Connecting structure to function with the recovery of over 1000 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes from activated sludge using long-read sequencing.利用长读测序从活性污泥中恢复超过 1000 个高质量宏基因组组装基因组,将结构与功能联系起来。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 31;12(1):2009. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22203-2.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Expanded catalog of microbial genes and metagenome-assembled genomes from the pig gut microbiome.猪肠道微生物组中的微生物基因和宏基因组组装基因组的扩展目录。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 17;12(1):1106. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21295-0.