• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师对基于新能力的急诊医学标准化评估信竞争力的共识。

Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation.

作者信息

Schnapp Benjamin, Sehdev Morgan, Schrepel Caitlin, Bord Sharon, Pelletier-Bui Alexis, Alvarez Alai, Dubosh Nicole M, Park Yoon Soo, Shappell Eric

机构信息

BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.

Harvard-Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency Brigham and Women's Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.

出版信息

AEM Educ Train. 2024 Sep 12;8(5):e11024. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11024. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1002/aet2.11024
PMID:39280103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11393300/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency medicine (EM) has introduced a new, competency-based standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) template. While a previous version of the SLOE has been shown to promote a high degree of faculty consensus regarding competitiveness, this has not been shown for the new SLOE template.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new EM SLOE 2.0.

METHODS

Fifty mock SLOE 2.0 letters using the new template were drafted and sent to a group of experienced EM educators. The 50 letters were ranked by the experienced faculty as well as a point-based prediction model and a regression model and the results were compared.

RESULTS

Faculty consensus on competitiveness remained strong when using the new SLOE 2.0 format. The points-based prediction model and regression model both demonstrated a high level of agreement with faculty consensus rankings for the SLOE 2.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of the new, competency-based SLOE 2.0 format did not have a deleterious effect on faculty consensus rankings of competitiveness.

摘要

背景

急诊医学(EM)引入了一种基于能力的新型标准化评估信(SLOE)模板。虽然之前版本的SLOE已被证明能促使教员在竞争力方面达成高度共识,但新的SLOE模板尚未得到这样的验证。

目的

评估教员对新的急诊医学SLOE 2.0竞争力的共识。

方法

使用新模板起草了50封模拟SLOE 2.0信,并发送给一组经验丰富的急诊医学教育工作者。由经验丰富的教员以及基于分数的预测模型和回归模型对这50封信进行排名,并比较结果。

结果

使用新的SLOE 2.0格式时,教员在竞争力方面的共识仍然很强。基于分数的预测模型和回归模型都与教员对SLOE 2.0的共识排名高度一致。

结论

引入新的基于能力的SLOE 2.0格式对教员在竞争力方面的共识排名没有不利影响。

相似文献

1
Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation.教师对基于新能力的急诊医学标准化评估信竞争力的共识。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Sep 12;8(5):e11024. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11024. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Decoding competitiveness: Exploring how emergency medicine faculty interpret standardized letters of evaluation.解读竞争力:探究急诊医学教员如何解读标准化评价信函。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Aug 23;8(4):e11019. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11019. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Measuring and Predicting Faculty Consensus Rankings of Standardized Letters of Evaluation.测量和预测标准化推荐信中教师共识排名。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Feb;16(1):51-58. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00901.1. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
4
Medical student self-assessment as emergency medicine residency applicants.医学生作为急诊医学住院医师申请者的自我评估。
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Feb 19;5(3):e10578. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10578. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE): Findings From the New Electronic SLOE Format.急诊医学标准化评估信(SLOE):新型电子SLOE格式的研究结果
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Apr;11(2):182-186. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00344.1.
6
Lower-Third SLOE Rankings Impede, But Do Not Prevent, A Match in Emergency Medicine Residency Training.下三分之一的SLOE排名会阻碍但不会阻止急诊医学住院医师培训的匹配。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Dec 17;7:2382120520980487. doi: 10.1177/2382120520980487. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
7
Gender Differences in Language of Standardized Letter of Evaluation Narratives for Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants.急诊医学住院医师申请标准化推荐信叙述语言中的性别差异
AEM Educ Train. 2017 Sep 19;1(4):334-339. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10057. eCollection 2017 Oct.
8
A Comparison of Standardized Letters of Evaluation for Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants.标准化急诊住院医师申请人推荐信的比较。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 21;22(1):20-25. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.12.49086.
9
Ethnic and Racial Differences in Ratings in the Medical Student Standardized Letters of Evaluation (SLOE).医学生标准化推荐信(SLOE)中的评价存在种族差异。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):549-553. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01174.1.
10
Gender Differences in Language of Standardized Letter of Evaluation Narratives in Osteopathic Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants.整骨疗法急诊医学住院医师申请人标准化推荐信叙述语言中的性别差异
Cureus. 2021 Jul 25;13(7):e16622. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16622. eCollection 2021 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of individual item characteristics with faculty competitiveness rankings in emergency medicine standardized letters of evaluation.急诊医学标准化推荐信中个体项目特征与教员竞争力排名的关联
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jun 11;9(3):e70009. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70009. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) in emergency medicine: The internal validity of the SLOE 2.0.急诊医学标准化评估信(SLOE):SLOE 2.0的内部效度
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Feb 14;9(1):e70000. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70000. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Prevalence and characteristics of group standardized letters of evaluation in emergency medicine: A cross-sectional observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Decoding competitiveness: Exploring how emergency medicine faculty interpret standardized letters of evaluation.解读竞争力:探究急诊医学教员如何解读标准化评价信函。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Aug 23;8(4):e11019. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11019. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Measuring and Predicting Faculty Consensus Rankings of Standardized Letters of Evaluation.测量和预测标准化推荐信中教师共识排名。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Feb;16(1):51-58. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00901.1. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
3
The SLOE 2.0 becomes the subjective letter of evaluation.
急诊医学中团体标准化评估信的患病率及特征:一项横断面观察性研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jan 11;9(1):e11057. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11057. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Generalizability of consensus regarding standardized letters of evaluation competitiveness: A validity study in a national sample of emergency medicine faculty.关于标准化推荐信竞争力的共识的可推广性:一项针对全国急诊医学教员样本的效度研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Dec 9;8(6):e11049. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11049. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
ChatG-PD? Comparing large language model artificial intelligence and faculty rankings of the competitiveness of standardized letters of evaluation.ChatG-PD?比较大语言模型人工智能与标准化推荐信竞争力的教师排名。 (注:原文中ChatG-PD表述有误,可能是ChatGPT,这里按原文翻译)
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Dec 9;8(6):e11052. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11052. eCollection 2024 Dec.
SLOE 2.0成为主观评价信。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jun 22;7(3):e10882. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10882. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
More Than One-third of Orthopaedic Applicants Are in the Top 10%: The Standardized Letter of Recommendation and Evaluation of Orthopaedic Resident Applicants.超过三分之一的骨科申请人在前 10%:标准化推荐信和骨科住院医师申请人评估。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Aug 1;479(8):1703-1708. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001707.
5
Pediatric, Surgery, and Internal Medicine Program Director Interpretations of Letters of Recommendation.儿科、外科和内科项目主任对推荐信的解读。
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S64-S68. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002919.
6
The Standardized Letter of Evaluation for Postgraduate Training: A Concept Whose Time Has Come?研究生培训标准化评估信:一个时机已到的概念?
Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11):1480-1482. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001352.
7
A comparison of standardized and narrative letters of recommendation.标准化推荐信与叙述性推荐信的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;5(11):1101-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02670.x.