• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解读竞争力:探究急诊医学教员如何解读标准化评价信函。

Decoding competitiveness: Exploring how emergency medicine faculty interpret standardized letters of evaluation.

作者信息

Schrepel Caitlin, Sehdev Morgan, Dubosh Nicole M, Schnapp Benjamin H, Alvarez Al'ai, Pelletier-Bui Alexis, Hegarty Cullen, Bord Sharon, Shappell Eric

机构信息

University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle Washington USA.

Harvard-Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency Boston Massachusetts USA.

出版信息

AEM Educ Train. 2024 Aug 23;8(4):e11019. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11019. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/aet2.11019
PMID:39185031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11343972/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the importance of the standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) for application to emergency medicine (EM) residency, it is important that SLOE developers and authors understand how reviewers determine SLOE competitiveness. To inform SLOE design and authorship, the authors set out to build a novel theory to explain how faculty holistically interpret SLOE competitiveness.

METHODS

The authors used constructivist grounded theory to explore how EM faculty determine SLOE competitiveness. They used purposive sampling to recruit EM faculty participants with at least 1 year of experience in scoring SLOEs. One author conducted hour-long, semistructured interviews over Zoom between August 2023 and March 2024. Two authors iteratively coded the data to develop the initial codebook, organize codes into categories, and build connections to construct the resulting theory.

RESULTS

The authors interviewed 11 EM faculty from throughout the United States. Participants described a complex process to determine SLOE competitiveness. They began by contextualizing the SLOE to determine its trustworthiness and value before using various components of the SLOE to stratify and refine their understanding of competitiveness. Finally, when participants noted the inconsistency between different aspects of the SLOE, they used various methods to reconcile discordances and determine competitiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illuminates the framework used by EM faculty to determine applicant competitiveness based on the SLOE and highlights several factors that SLOE authors should consider to ensure the accurate and efficient transfer of information.

摘要

背景

鉴于标准化评估信(SLOE)在申请急诊医学(EM)住院医师项目中的重要性,SLOE的开发者和撰写者了解评审人员如何确定SLOE的竞争力至关重要。为了为SLOE的设计和撰写提供信息,作者着手构建一种新颖的理论,以解释教员如何全面解读SLOE的竞争力。

方法

作者运用建构主义扎根理论来探究急诊医学教员如何确定SLOE的竞争力。他们采用目的抽样法招募了至少有1年SLOE评分经验的急诊医学教员参与者。一位作者在2023年8月至2024年3月期间通过Zoom进行了长达一小时的半结构化访谈。两位作者对数据进行迭代编码,以开发初始编码手册,将代码组织成类别,并建立联系以构建最终的理论。

结果

作者采访了来自美国各地的11位急诊医学教员。参与者描述了一个确定SLOE竞争力的复杂过程。他们首先对SLOE进行背景分析,以确定其可信度和价值,然后使用SLOE的各个组成部分来分层并完善他们对竞争力的理解。最后,当参与者注意到SLOE不同方面之间的不一致时,他们使用各种方法来协调不一致之处并确定竞争力。

结论

本研究阐明了急诊医学教员基于SLOE确定申请人竞争力所使用的框架,并强调了SLOE撰写者应考虑的几个因素,以确保信息的准确和有效传递。

相似文献

1
Decoding competitiveness: Exploring how emergency medicine faculty interpret standardized letters of evaluation.解读竞争力:探究急诊医学教员如何解读标准化评价信函。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Aug 23;8(4):e11019. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11019. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Association of individual item characteristics with faculty competitiveness rankings in emergency medicine standardized letters of evaluation.急诊医学标准化推荐信中个体项目特征与教员竞争力排名的关联
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jun 11;9(3):e70009. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70009. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Generalizability of consensus regarding standardized letters of evaluation competitiveness: A validity study in a national sample of emergency medicine faculty.关于标准化推荐信竞争力的共识的可推广性:一项针对全国急诊医学教员样本的效度研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Dec 9;8(6):e11049. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11049. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Prevalence and characteristics of group standardized letters of evaluation in emergency medicine: A cross-sectional observational study.急诊医学中团体标准化评估信的患病率及特征:一项横断面观察性研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jan 11;9(1):e11057. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11057. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Differences in language used to describe racial groups in emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信中用于描述种族群体的语言差异。
AEM Educ Train. 2025 May 19;9(3):e70054. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70054. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
How Do Individuals Perceive Diagnostic Labels and Explanations for Hip Pain? A Qualitative Study Among Adults With Persistent Hip Pain.个体如何看待髋关节疼痛的诊断标签和解释?一项针对持续性髋关节疼痛成年人的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003445.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of individual item characteristics with faculty competitiveness rankings in emergency medicine standardized letters of evaluation.急诊医学标准化推荐信中个体项目特征与教员竞争力排名的关联
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jun 11;9(3):e70009. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70009. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Prevalence and characteristics of group standardized letters of evaluation in emergency medicine: A cross-sectional observational study.急诊医学中团体标准化评估信的患病率及特征:一项横断面观察性研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Jan 11;9(1):e11057. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11057. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Generalizability of consensus regarding standardized letters of evaluation competitiveness: A validity study in a national sample of emergency medicine faculty.关于标准化推荐信竞争力的共识的可推广性:一项针对全国急诊医学教员样本的效度研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Dec 9;8(6):e11049. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11049. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
ChatG-PD? Comparing large language model artificial intelligence and faculty rankings of the competitiveness of standardized letters of evaluation.ChatG-PD?比较大语言模型人工智能与标准化推荐信竞争力的教师排名。 (注:原文中ChatG-PD表述有误,可能是ChatGPT,这里按原文翻译)
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Dec 9;8(6):e11052. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11052. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation.教师对基于新能力的急诊医学标准化评估信竞争力的共识。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Sep 12;8(5):e11024. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11024. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring and Predicting Faculty Consensus Rankings of Standardized Letters of Evaluation.测量和预测标准化推荐信中教师共识排名。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Feb;16(1):51-58. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00901.1. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
2
Perception of Quiet Students in Emergency Medicine: An Exploration of Narratives in the Standardized Letter of Evaluation.急诊医学中安静学生的感知:标准化评估信叙事的探索。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 12;24(4):728-731. doi: 10.5811/westjem.57756.
3
A Call to Action for Standardizing Letters of Recommendation.一封关于规范推荐信的行动呼吁书。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Dec;14(6):642-646. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00131.1.
4
Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80.虚拟面试在研究生医学教育招聘和选拔中的应用:BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 80 号。
Med Teach. 2022 Dec;44(12):1313-1331. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2130038. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
Racial Bias on the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信函中的种族偏见。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):542-548. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01144.1.
6
Gender differences in emergency medicine standardized letters of evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信中的性别差异。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Apr 1;6(2):e10740. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10740. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
8
Beyond the Guise of Saturation: Rigor and Qualitative Interview Data.超越饱和度表象:严谨性与定性访谈数据
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Oct;13(5):607-611. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00752.1. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
9
Selection of Neurological Surgery Applicants and the Value of Standardized Letters of Evaluation: A Survey of United States Program Directors.神经外科申请者的选拔及标准化推荐信的价值:美国项目主任的一项调查
World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;136:e342-e346. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.176. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
10
The F Word: How "Fit" Threatens the Validity of Resident Recruitment.“合适”一词:“合适度”如何威胁住院医师招聘的有效性。
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Dec;11(6):635-636. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00400.1.