• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一级创伤中心与综合性社区医院治疗重伤患者的结果对比。

Outcome of critically injured patients treated at Level I trauma centers versus full-service community hospitals.

作者信息

Clemmer T P, Orme J F, Thomas F O, Brooks K A

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):861-3. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00019.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-198510000-00019
PMID:3928251
Abstract

Critically injured patients were identified by a CRAMS (circulation, respiration, abdomen, motor, speech) score of 6 or less while still in the field. They were prospectively followed as they received their care at the nearest medical facility according to the then-existing district Emergency Medical Services protocols. Those cared for by Level I trauma centers had a significantly reduced mortality rate compared to those treated at the other large full-service community hospitals. The commitment to Level I trauma care improves outcome of the critically injured, and field triage of the critically injured patient to these centers is indicated.

摘要

在现场时,通过CRAMS(循环、呼吸、腹部、运动、言语)评分为6分及以下来识别重伤患者。根据当时现有的地区紧急医疗服务协议,当他们在最近的医疗机构接受治疗时,对他们进行前瞻性跟踪。与在其他大型综合性社区医院接受治疗的患者相比,由一级创伤中心治疗的患者死亡率显著降低。对一级创伤护理的投入改善了重伤患者的治疗结果,因此建议将重伤患者现场分诊到这些中心。

相似文献

1
Outcome of critically injured patients treated at Level I trauma centers versus full-service community hospitals.一级创伤中心与综合性社区医院治疗重伤患者的结果对比。
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):861-3. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00019.
2
Prospective evaluation of the CRAMS scale for triaging major trauma.用于重大创伤分诊的CRAMS量表的前瞻性评估。
J Trauma. 1985 Mar;25(3):188-91. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198503000-00003.
3
Effectiveness of implementing a trauma triage system on outcome: a prospective evaluation.实施创伤分诊系统对治疗结果的有效性:一项前瞻性评估。
J Trauma. 1988 Oct;28(10):1493-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198810000-00017.
4
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients. Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage.受伤患者现场分诊指南。国家现场分诊专家小组的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009 Jan 23;58(RR-1):1-35.
5
Deaths and high-risk trauma patients missed by standard trauma data sources.标准创伤数据源遗漏的死亡病例和高风险创伤患者。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Sep;83(3):427-437. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001616.
6
Prospective Validation of the National Field Triage Guidelines for Identifying Seriously Injured Persons.用于识别重伤人员的国家现场分诊指南的前瞻性验证
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Feb;222(2):146-58.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
7
CRAMS scale: field triage of trauma victims.CRAMS评分量表:创伤患者的现场分诊
Ann Emerg Med. 1982 Mar;11(3):132-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(82)80237-0.
8
District-level hospital trauma care audit filters: Delphi technique for defining context-appropriate indicators for quality improvement initiative evaluation in developing countries.区级医院创伤护理审计筛选标准:用于为发展中国家质量改进计划评估定义适合当地情况指标的德尔菲法。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
Outcome of critically injured patients treated at Level I trauma centers versus full-service community hospitals.
Crit Care Med. 1986 Jun;14(6):596-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198606000-00023.
10
Undertriage of Trauma-Related Deaths in U.S. Emergency Departments.美国急诊科创伤相关死亡的分诊不足
West J Emerg Med. 2016 May;17(3):315-23. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.2.29327. Epub 2016 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of trauma teams on high grade liver injury care: a two-decade propensity score approach study in Taiwan.创伤团队对高级别肝损伤治疗的影响:台湾一项长达二十年的倾向评分匹配研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 3;13(1):5429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32760-9.
2
Worldwide snapshot of trauma team structure and training: an international survey.全球创伤团队结构和培训概况:一项国际调查。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1771-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02166-9. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
3
Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.
第12部分:教育、实施与团队:2010年心肺复苏及心血管急救科学与治疗建议国际共识。
Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81 Suppl 1(1):e288-330. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.030.
4
[Impact of rescue method and the destination clinic on mortality in polytrauma. A status report].[创伤救治方法及接收医院对多发伤患者死亡率的影响。现状报告]
Unfallchirurg. 2005 May;108(5):370-7. doi: 10.1007/s00113-005-0928-x.
5
Facilities and equipment in district general hospitals in the Netherlands: are we prepared for the critically ill paediatric patients?荷兰地区综合医院的设施与设备:我们是否为危重症儿科患者做好了准备?
Emerg Med J. 2004 Jan;21(1):61-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.011650.
6
Outcomes of neurocritical care.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2001 Nov;1(6):593-8. doi: 10.1007/s11910-001-0067-x.
7
An analysis of the association of trauma centers with per capita hospitalizations and death rates from injury.创伤中心与人均住院率及伤害死亡率之间关联的分析。
Ann Surg. 1993 Oct;218(4):512-21; discussion 521-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199310000-00011.
8
Current concepts in trauma: 1. Principles and directions for development.创伤的当前概念:1. 发展原则与方向。
CMAJ. 1989 Sep 15;141(6):529-33.
9
Outcome, transport times, and costs of patients evacuated by helicopter versus fixed-wing aircraft.直升机与固定翼飞机转运患者的结局、转运时间及成本。
West J Med. 1990 Jul;153(1):40-3.