• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CRAMS评分量表:创伤患者的现场分诊

CRAMS scale: field triage of trauma victims.

作者信息

Gormican S P

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1982 Mar;11(3):132-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(82)80237-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(82)80237-0
PMID:7065486
Abstract

A simple 10-point scale was devised for the purpose of determining which trauma patients should go to a trauma center. The acronym "CRAMS" represents the five components measured: Circulation, Respiration, Abdomen, Motor, and Speech. The results of field triage were compared to final emergency department (ED) disposition. Those patients who died in the ED and those who went directly to the operating room (OR) for general surgery or neurosurgery were defined as major trauma. Of 12 patients defined as major trauma by ED disposition, 11 were defined as major trauma (CRAMS less than or equal to 8) in the field (sensitivity, 92%). This was compared to 8 defined as major trauma by Champion's Trauma Score. Of 313 defined as minor trauma by ED disposition (discharged home), 307 were defined as minor trauma (CRAMS greater than or equal to 9) in the field (specificity, 98%). The CRAMS scale provides an effective net for major trauma while ensuring that minor trauma is not unnecessarily diverted to a trauma center.

摘要

为确定哪些创伤患者应前往创伤中心,设计了一个简单的10分制量表。首字母缩写词“CRAMS”代表所测量的五个组成部分:循环、呼吸、腹部、运动和言语。将现场分诊结果与急诊科最终处置情况进行比较。那些在急诊科死亡的患者以及那些直接前往手术室进行普通外科手术或神经外科手术的患者被定义为严重创伤。在急诊科处置中被定义为严重创伤的12例患者中,11例在现场被定义为严重创伤(CRAMS评分小于或等于8)(敏感性为92%)。相比之下,根据冠军创伤评分,有8例被定义为严重创伤。在急诊科处置中被定义为轻伤(出院回家)的313例患者中,307例在现场被定义为轻伤(CRAMS评分大于或等于9)(特异性为98%)。CRAMS量表为严重创伤提供了一个有效的筛选工具,同时确保轻伤患者不会被不必要地转送至创伤中心。

相似文献

1
CRAMS scale: field triage of trauma victims.CRAMS评分量表:创伤患者的现场分诊
Ann Emerg Med. 1982 Mar;11(3):132-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(82)80237-0.
2
Prospective evaluation of the CRAMS scale for triaging major trauma.用于重大创伤分诊的CRAMS量表的前瞻性评估。
J Trauma. 1985 Mar;25(3):188-91. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198503000-00003.
3
Ineffectiveness of the trauma score and the CRAMS scale for accurately triaging patients to trauma centers.创伤评分和CRAMS量表在将患者准确分诊至创伤中心方面的无效性。
Ann Emerg Med. 1985 Nov;14(11):1061-4. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(85)80920-3.
4
Improving the field triage of major trauma victims.改善重大创伤受害者的现场分诊。
J Trauma. 1988 May;28(5):602-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198805000-00006.
5
Revised Trauma Score and CRAMS better predicted mortality in high-energy-trauma patients than Early-Warning Score.修订后的创伤评分和 CRAMS 比早期预警评分更能预测高能创伤患者的死亡率。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Aug;192(4):1855-1860. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03208-2. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
6
Effectiveness of implementing a trauma triage system on outcome: a prospective evaluation.实施创伤分诊系统对治疗结果的有效性:一项前瞻性评估。
J Trauma. 1988 Oct;28(10):1493-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198810000-00017.
7
Prehospital triage in the injured pediatric patient.受伤儿童患者的院前分诊
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Jan;35(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(00)80019-6.
8
The efficacy of a two-tiered trauma activation system at a level I trauma center.一级创伤中心两级创伤激活系统的疗效。
J Trauma. 2009 Oct;67(4):829-33. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b57b6d.
9
Performance of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Circulation, Respiration, Abdomen, Motor, and Speech (CRAMS) score in trauma severity and in-hospital mortality prediction in multiple trauma patients: a comparison study.改良早期预警评分(MEWS)与循环、呼吸、腹部、运动及言语(CRAMS)评分在多发伤患者创伤严重程度及院内死亡率预测中的表现:一项比较研究
PeerJ. 2019 Jun 25;7:e7227. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7227. eCollection 2019.
10
Criteria for safe cost-effective pediatric trauma triage: prehospital evaluation and distribution of injured children.安全且具成本效益的儿科创伤分诊标准:院前评估与受伤儿童的分流
J Pediatr Surg. 1994 Jun;29(6):738-41. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90358-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A robust optimization model for allocation-routing problems under uncertain conditions.一种用于不确定条件下分配-路由问题的鲁棒优化模型。
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0322483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322483. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and validation of risk prediction model for adverse outcomes in trauma patients.创伤患者不良结局风险预测模型的建立与验证。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2391018. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2391018. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Revised Trauma Score and CRAMS better predicted mortality in high-energy-trauma patients than Early-Warning Score.
修订后的创伤评分和 CRAMS 比早期预警评分更能预测高能创伤患者的死亡率。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Aug;192(4):1855-1860. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03208-2. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Accuracy and influencing factors of the Field Triage Decision Scheme for adult trauma patients at a level-1 trauma center in Korea.韩国一级创伤中心成人创伤患者现场分诊决策方案的准确性及其影响因素。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00637-1.
5
An improved modified early warning score that incorporates the abdomen score for identifying multiple traumatic injury severity.一种改进的改良早期预警评分,纳入腹部评分以识别多发创伤的严重程度。
PeerJ. 2020 Oct 27;8:e10242. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10242. eCollection 2020.
6
Trauma models to identify major trauma and mortality in the prehospital setting.创伤模型在院前环境中识别重大创伤和死亡率。
Br J Surg. 2020 Mar;107(4):373-380. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11304. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
7
Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score versus Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients with altered sensorium: A comparison of inter-observer variability and outcomes.意识改变的危重症患者中无反应性评分与格拉斯哥昏迷量表的全面比较:观察者间变异性和预后的比较
Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;63(8):640-647. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_377_19.
8
Performance of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Circulation, Respiration, Abdomen, Motor, and Speech (CRAMS) score in trauma severity and in-hospital mortality prediction in multiple trauma patients: a comparison study.改良早期预警评分(MEWS)与循环、呼吸、腹部、运动及言语(CRAMS)评分在多发伤患者创伤严重程度及院内死亡率预测中的表现:一项比较研究
PeerJ. 2019 Jun 25;7:e7227. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7227. eCollection 2019.
9
Revision of the medicolegal assessment criteria in hypovolemic patients.低血容量患者法医学评估标准的修订
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(11):e14799. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014799.
10
Performance of injury severity measures in trauma research: a literature review and validation analysis of studies from low-income and middle-income countries.创伤研究中损伤严重程度测量的性能:来自低收入和中等收入国家的研究的文献回顾和验证分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 4;9(1):e023161. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023161.