Otiato Maxwell X, Muy Kevin, Scotland Kymora B
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Urology. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.07.019.
To assess collaborations in global urological surgery research and trends in authorship representation for studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A systematic bibliometric scoping review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines to outline global collaboration patterns in urological surgery research. Literature searches in PubMed and Scopus included articles published from inception to January 1, 2024. Articles were included if they described urological surgery research involving a high-income country (HIC) conducted exclusively in LMICs. Articles were excluded if unrelated to urological surgery or if a collaboration between HICs and LMICs was not outlined. Data analysis was conducted from February to April 2024. A total of 1777 peer-reviewed articles were identified and 108 studies met inclusion criteria. Most articles (89.8%) were published in 2009 or later. A significant majority of studies (81.5%) involved at least one author from the LMIC of focus and were considered collaborative. First and senior authors predominantly originated from HICs, particularly in studies based in low-income countries (88.2% and 94.1%). Fifty-two articles (48.15%) were focused on educational initiatives, followed by training (23%) and humanitarian efforts (13%). Sub-Saharan Africa contributed the largest share of studies (19%), while Latin America and the Caribbean had the highest collaboration rates (20%). Endourology was the most frequently studied field across the research areas. This study highlights an upward trend in international urological surgery research with collaborative partnerships. These findings set a benchmark for promoting and sustaining equitable participation in global urological surgery research based in LMICs.
评估全球泌尿外科手术研究中的合作情况以及低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)开展研究的作者代表性趋势。使用PRISMA指南进行了一项系统的文献计量范围综述,以概述泌尿外科手术研究中的全球合作模式。在PubMed和Scopus中进行文献检索,纳入从创刊至2024年1月1日发表的文章。如果文章描述了仅在LMICs开展的涉及高收入国家(HIC)的泌尿外科手术研究,则予以纳入。如果与泌尿外科手术无关或未概述HICs与LMICs之间的合作,则排除文章。数据分析于2024年2月至4月进行。共识别出1777篇同行评审文章,108项研究符合纳入标准。大多数文章(89.8%)发表于2009年或之后。绝大多数研究(81.5%)至少有一位来自重点LMIC的作者,被视为合作研究。第一作者和资深作者主要来自HICs,特别是在低收入国家开展的研究中(分别为88.2%和94.1%)。52篇文章(48.15%)聚焦于教育倡议,其次是培训(23%)和人道主义努力(13%)。撒哈拉以南非洲贡献的研究份额最大(19%),而拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的合作率最高(20%)。腔内泌尿外科是各研究领域中研究最频繁的领域。本研究突出了国际泌尿外科手术研究与合作伙伴关系的上升趋势。这些发现为促进和维持基于LMICs的全球泌尿外科手术研究中的公平参与设定了基准。