Marwa Windi Lameck, Griffiths Claire, Edwards Sophie, Gately Paul, Marshall Caroline, Cooke Carlton
Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.
MoreLife, Leeds, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 16;19(9):e0295483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295483. eCollection 2024.
Smoking is a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality globally. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Smoking Cessation (SC) services faced many challenges, including lockdown and social distancing restrictions. Consequently, SC services had to adapt to the challenges in different ways or halt delivery. This research evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on the delivery and outcomes of SC services. This was achieved by comparing service delivery and outcomes pre-COVID-19 and during the pandemic and drawing insights for the delivery of SC services post-pandemic. Secondary analysis was performed on the data of 11,533 participants who attended the One Life Suffolk (OLS) SC services pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 4923 and 6610 participants attended SC services pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19 respectively. Fifty-four percent of participants achieved quit status at week-4 while attending the SC services during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with 46% pre-COVID-19, (X2(1) = 38.2, p-value<0.001). Participants who attended the SC services during the COVID-19 period were 1.7 times more likely to achieve quit status at week-4 than pre-COVID-19. However, the proportion of participants lost-to-follow-up (LTF) was significantly higher during the COVID-19 period (11%) compared to pre-COVID-19 (7%), (X2(1) = 51.4, p-value <0.001). There was an increased participation and quit rate during the pandemic for modified, remotely delivered SC services indicating successful delivery of remote services during the pandemic. Although switching from face-to-face to online helped some smokers to access the service at a time of motivational readiness, despite the COVID-19 restrictions, some smokers could not access or use some aspects of the remote delivery due to a lack of internet access, poor digital literacy, no peer support and no commitment to a group during face-to-face sessions, contributing to an increased rate of LTF. Posing a major challenge to SC services delivery, COVID-19 compelled OLS SC services to adapt and be more innovative in their delivery. SC services need to continue to evolve and adapt by applying the lessons learnt during the pandemic in terms of flexibility and person-centered delivery given what did and did not work well for different demographics within the population.
吸烟是全球可预防发病和死亡的主要原因。在新冠疫情期间,戒烟服务面临诸多挑战,包括封锁和社交距离限制。因此,戒烟服务不得不以不同方式应对这些挑战,或停止服务。本研究评估了新冠疫情对戒烟服务的提供及效果的影响。这通过比较新冠疫情前和疫情期间的服务提供情况及效果,并为疫情后戒烟服务的提供汲取经验来实现。对11533名在新冠疫情前及疫情期间参加萨福克“一生”(OLS)戒烟服务的参与者的数据进行了二次分析。分别有4923名和6610名参与者在新冠疫情前及疫情期间参加了戒烟服务。在新冠疫情期间参加戒烟服务的参与者中,54%在第4周达到了戒烟状态,而在新冠疫情前这一比例为46%,(X2(1)=38.2,p值<0.001)。在新冠疫情期间参加戒烟服务的参与者在第4周达到戒烟状态的可能性是新冠疫情前的1.7倍。然而,与新冠疫情前(7%)相比,在新冠疫情期间失访(LTF)参与者的比例显著更高(11%),(X2(1)=51.4,p值<0.001)。在疫情期间,经过改进的远程戒烟服务的参与率和戒烟率有所提高,表明疫情期间远程服务的成功提供。尽管从面对面服务转向在线服务帮助一些吸烟者在有戒烟动机时能够获得服务,但尽管有新冠疫情限制,一些吸烟者由于缺乏互联网接入、数字素养差、没有同伴支持以及在面对面课程中没有对团体的承诺,无法获得或使用远程服务的某些方面,导致失访率上升。新冠疫情给戒烟服务的提供带来了重大挑战,迫使OLS戒烟服务进行调整并在服务提供方面更具创新性。鉴于在疫情期间针对人群中不同人口统计学特征哪些措施有效、哪些无效,戒烟服务需要通过应用在疫情期间学到的关于灵活性和以人为主的服务提供方面的经验教训,继续发展和调整。