Beckmeyer Annamarie L, Brenner-Levoy Jeremy A, Hill B Jessie, Odum Tamika C, Turner Abigail Norris, Norris Alison H, Bessett Danielle, Rivlin Katherine L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Sociology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;56(4):329-336. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12284. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
In the era of Dobbs, legality of abortion care in the United States depends upon state law. Even before Dobbs, while abortion remained legal mounting restrictions and debate surrounding legal abortion could have led to confusion about abortion legality and discouraged patients from accessing legal abortion. We hypothesized an association between believing abortion is illegal or uncertainty about legality with later timing of abortion care.
We surveyed patients seeking abortion care in Ohio, West Virginia, and Kentucky from April 2020 to April 2021. We asked about their understanding of abortion legality at the time they were first deciding to have an abortion. Using unconditional logistic regression models, we examined associations between beliefs about abortion legality (measured as belief that abortion is legal or sometimes legal versus. illegal or unsure) and timing of abortion care (measured as trimester of abortion).
Over half (57%) of the 1,479 patients who met eligibility criteria and completed the survey believed abortion was always legal, 21% thought abortion was sometimes legal, 12% believed abortion was illegal, and 10% did not know. Most (92%) had a first trimester abortion (<14 weeks gestation). Belief that abortion was illegal, or uncertainty about abortion legality, was not significantly associated with second trimester abortion care (unadjusted odds ratio [uOR]: 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.20). This association did not change meaningfully after adjusting for demographic and clinical variables (adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.51-1.33).
More than one in five patients presenting for abortion care in three abortion-restrictive states prior to Dobbs erroneously believed that abortion was illegal or were unsure. Understanding of legality was not significantly associated with timing of abortion care. These misunderstandings could escalate under Dobbs.
在多布斯时代,美国堕胎护理的合法性取决于州法律。甚至在多布斯案之前,虽然堕胎仍然合法,但围绕合法堕胎的越来越多的限制和争论可能导致人们对堕胎合法性产生困惑,并阻碍患者获得合法堕胎服务。我们推测,认为堕胎非法或对合法性存在不确定性与较晚进行堕胎护理之间存在关联。
我们在2020年4月至2021年4月期间对俄亥俄州、西弗吉尼亚州和肯塔基州寻求堕胎护理的患者进行了调查。我们询问了他们在首次决定堕胎时对堕胎合法性的理解。使用无条件逻辑回归模型,我们研究了关于堕胎合法性的信念(分为认为堕胎合法或有时合法与非法或不确定)与堕胎护理时间(以堕胎 trimester 衡量)之间的关联。
在符合资格标准并完成调查的1479名患者中,超过一半(57%)的人认为堕胎始终合法,21%的人认为堕胎有时合法,12%的人认为堕胎非法,10%的人不知道。大多数(92%)进行了孕早期堕胎(妊娠<14周)。认为堕胎非法或对堕胎合法性存在不确定性与孕中期堕胎护理之间没有显著关联(未调整优势比[uOR]:0.78,95%置信区间[CI]:0.50 - 1.20)。在调整人口统计学和临床变量后,这种关联没有明显变化(调整后优势比[aOR]:0.83,95% CI:0.51 - 1.33)。
在多布斯案之前,在三个限制堕胎的州中,超过五分之一寻求堕胎护理的患者错误地认为堕胎非法或不确定。对合法性的理解与堕胎护理时间没有显著关联。在多布斯案下,这些误解可能会加剧。