National Abortion Federation, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.033. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted health care delivery in all aspects of medicine, including abortion care. For 6 months, the mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) was temporarily blocked, allowing for the remote provision of medication abortion. Remote medication abortion may become a dominant model of care in the future, either through the formal health system or through self-sourced, self-managed abortion. Clinics already face pressure from falling abortion rates and excessive regulation and with a transition to remote abortion, may not be able to sustain services. Although remote medication abortion improves access for many, those who need or want in-clinic care such as people later in pregnancy, people for whom abortion at home is not safe or feasible, or people who are not eligible for medication abortion, will need comprehensive support to access safe and appropriate care. To understand how we may adapt to remote abortion without leaving people behind, we can look outside of the U.S. to become familiar with emerging and alternative models of abortion care.
COVID-19 大流行扰乱了医学各个方面的医疗保健服务,包括堕胎护理。有 6 个月的时间,米非司酮风险评估和缓解策略 (REMS) 被暂时封锁,允许远程提供药物流产。远程药物流产可能会成为未来的主要护理模式,无论是通过正规医疗系统还是通过自行获取、自我管理的堕胎。诊所已经面临着堕胎率下降和过度监管的压力,而向远程堕胎过渡,可能无法维持服务。尽管远程药物流产为许多人提供了便利,但那些需要或希望获得门诊护理的人,如怀孕后期的人、在家堕胎不安全或不可行的人,或不符合药物流产条件的人,将需要全面的支持来获得安全和适当的护理。为了了解我们如何在不落下任何人的情况下适应远程堕胎,我们可以放眼美国之外,了解新兴和替代的堕胎护理模式。