• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护患者左心室流出道速度时间积分的手动与自动超声测量之间的一致性:AUTO-VTI®工具的评估

Agreement between manual and automatic ultrasound measurement of the velocity-time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract in intensive care patients: evaluation of the AUTO-VTI® tool.

作者信息

Louart Benjamin, Muller Laurent, Emond Baptiste, Boulet Nicolas, Roger Claire

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes-Caremeau University Hospital, Place du Professeur Robert Debré, CEDEX 9, 30029, Nîmes, France.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Apr;39(2):355-364. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01215-5. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10877-024-01215-5
PMID:39287731
Abstract

Transthoracic echocardiography is widely used in intensive care unit (ICU) to manage patients with acute circulatory failure. Recently, automated ultrasound (US) measurement applications have been developed but their clinical performance has not been evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between automated and manual measurements of the velocity-time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract (VTI-LVOT) using the auto-VTI® tool. This prospective, single-center, interventional study included ICU patients with acute circulatory failure. The examination involved two successive manual measurements of VTI-LVOT (mean of 3 consecutive heartbeats in regular sinus rhythm, and 5 heartbeats in irregular rhythm), followed by a measurement using auto-VTI® software. In patients receiving a fluid challenge, trending ability in detecting fluid responsiveness was also evaluated. Seventy patients were included between January 19, 2020, and September 24, 2020, at the Nîmes University Hospital. The feasibility of the auto-VTI® was 94%. The mean difference between the two methods was 11% with limits of agreement from - 19% to 42%. The proportion of agreement at the 15% difference threshold was 68% [58%; 80%]. The precision and least significant change measured for the manual measurement of VTI were 7.4 and 10.5%, respectively, and by inference for the automated method 28% and 40%. The new auto-VTI® tool, despite interesting feasibility, demonstrated an insufficient agreement with a systematic bias and an insufficient precision limiting its implementation in critically ill patients.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04360304.

摘要

经胸超声心动图在重症监护病房(ICU)中广泛用于管理急性循环衰竭患者。最近,已开发出自动超声(US)测量应用程序,但其临床性能尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是使用auto-VTI®工具评估左心室流出道速度时间积分(VTI-LVOT)自动测量与手动测量之间的一致性。这项前瞻性、单中心、干预性研究纳入了患有急性循环衰竭的ICU患者。检查包括对VTI-LVOT进行两次连续的手动测量(窦性心律规则时连续3个心跳的平均值,心律不规则时5个心跳),然后使用auto-VTI®软件进行测量。在接受液体冲击的患者中,还评估了检测液体反应性的趋势能力。2020年1月19日至2020年9月24日期间,尼姆大学医院共纳入70例患者。auto-VTI®的可行性为94%。两种方法之间的平均差异为11%,一致性界限为-19%至42%。差异阈值为15%时的一致性比例为68%[58%;80%]。手动测量VTI的精度和最小显著变化分别为7.4%和10.5%,据此推断自动测量方法的精度和最小显著变化分别为28%和40%。尽管新的auto-VTI®工具具有可观的可行性,但在一致性方面表现不足,存在系统偏差且精度不够,限制了其在重症患者中的应用。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04360304。

相似文献

1
Agreement between manual and automatic ultrasound measurement of the velocity-time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract in intensive care patients: evaluation of the AUTO-VTI® tool.重症监护患者左心室流出道速度时间积分的手动与自动超声测量之间的一致性:AUTO-VTI®工具的评估
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Apr;39(2):355-364. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01215-5. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
2
Automated and reference methods for the calculation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral or ejection fraction by non-cardiologists: a systematic review on the agreement of the two methods.非心脏病专家计算左心室流出道速度时间积分或射血分数的自动化方法与参考方法:关于两种方法一致性的系统评价
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Jun;39(3):505-515. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01259-7. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
3
Passive leg raising test to predict fluid responsiveness using the right ventricle outflow tract velocity-time integral through a subcostal view.通过肋下视图利用右心室流出道速度时间积分进行被动抬腿试验以预测液体反应性。
J Ultrasound. 2025 Mar;28(1):19-25. doi: 10.1007/s40477-022-00719-7. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Agreement between carotid and LVOT non-invasive cardiac output measurements in ED septic shock patients: a prospective observational study.急诊科脓毒性休克患者颈动脉与左心室流出道无创心输出量测量的一致性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 6;15(1):19911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05077-y.
5
Artificial intelligence (AI) versus expert: A comparison of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) assessment between ICU doctors and an AI tool.人工智能(AI)与专家:比较 ICU 医生和 AI 工具对左心室流出道速度时间积分(LVOT-VTI)的评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Aug;23(8):e13724. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13724. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
6
Right Ventricular Strain and Outflow Tract Velocity Time Integral Are Associated with Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.右心室应变和流出道速度时间积分与重症肺栓塞患者的死亡率相关。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Aug;211(8):1427-1441. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202407-1433OC.
7
Melatonin for the promotion of sleep in adults in the intensive care unit.褪黑素用于促进重症监护病房成年患者的睡眠。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 10;5(5):CD012455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012455.pub2.
8
Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for the diagnosis of delirium in adults in critical care settings.**用于** ICU 成人患者的意识模糊评估方法(CAM-ICU)**用于** 诊断重症监护环境下成人的意识障碍。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 21;11(11):CD013126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013126.pub2.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness.重症监护病房出院后进行运动康复以促进危重症恢复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 22;2015(6):CD008632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008632.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The French clinical research in the European Community regulation era.欧洲共同体法规时代的法国临床研究。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Apr;42(2):101192. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101192. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
2
Stab wound of the superficial femoral artery early diagnosed by point-of-care Doppler ultrasound.床旁多普勒超声早期诊断股浅动脉刺伤
Ultrasound J. 2020 Jun 16;12(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00179-2.
3
Perioperative echocardiography-guided hemodynamic therapy in high-risk patients: a practical expert approach of hemodynamically focused echocardiography.
围术期超声心动图引导高危患者血流动力学治疗:血流动力学聚焦超声心动图的实用专家方法。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Apr;35(2):229-243. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00534-7. Epub 2020 May 26.
4
Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis.超声心动图与热稀释法测量心输出量的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 3;14(10):e0222105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222105. eCollection 2019.
5
Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study.脓毒症液体反应性的时间进程:液体冲击再评估(FCREV)研究。
Crit Care. 2019 May 16;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2448-z.
6
What is the lowest change in cardiac output that transthoracic echocardiography can detect?经胸超声心动图能检测到的最低心输出量变化是多少?
Crit Care. 2019 Apr 11;23(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2413-x.
7
French legal approach to clinical research.法国的临床研究法律方法。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Dec;37(6):607-614. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
8
A New Echocardiographic Tool for Cardiac Output Evaluation: An Experimental Study.一种新的超声心动图心输出量评估工具:一项实验研究。
Shock. 2019 Oct;52(4):449-455. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001273.
9
The Bland-Altman range of agreement: Exact interval procedure and sample size determination. Bland-Altman 一致性区间:精确区间法和样本量确定。
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Sep 1;100:247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
10
Lack of correlation between left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and stroke volume index in mechanically ventilated patients.机械通气患者左心室流出道速度时间积分与每搏量指数之间缺乏相关性。
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar;43(2):73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.11.012. Epub 2018 Feb 7.