Suppr超能文献

数字化医疗中的用户档案:活跃、潜在和拒绝 - 使用潜在类别分析的横断面研究。

User profiles in digitalized healthcare: active, potential, and rejecting - a cross-sectional study using latent class analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Sociology, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, Halle (Saale), 06112, Germany.

Institute of General Practice & Family Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11523-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is evidence of different use by different groups of people for general health-related applications. Yet, these findings are lacking for digitalized healthcare services. It is also unclear whether typical use patterns can be found and how user types can be characterized.

METHODS

The analyses are based on data from 1 821 respondents to the Health Related Beliefs and Health Care Experiences in Germany panel (HeReCa). Digitalized healthcare services, that were used to determine the user types, include for example sick notes before/after examination and disease related training. User types were determined by latent class analysis. Individual groups were characterized using multinomial logistic regressions, taking into account socioeconomic and demographic factors as well as individual attitudes towards digitalization in the healthcare system.

RESULTS

Three types were identified: rejecting (27.9%), potential (53.8%) and active (18.3%). Active participants were less likely to be employed, less likely to be highly educated and less skeptical of digital technologies. Potential users were the youngest, most highly-educated and most frequently employed group, with less skepticism than those who rejected. Rejecters were the oldest group, more likely to be female and of higher socio-economic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Socio-demographic and socio-economic differences were identified among three user types. It can therefore be assumed that not all population groups will benefit from the trend towards digitalization in healthcare. Steps should be taken to enhance access to innovations and ensure that everyone benefits from them.

摘要

背景

不同人群在一般与健康相关的应用方面有不同的使用证据。然而,这些发现缺乏数字化医疗保健服务的相关内容。也不清楚是否可以找到典型的使用模式,以及如何描述用户类型。

方法

本分析基于德国健康相关信念和医疗保健经验面板(HeReCa)的 1821 名受访者的数据。用于确定用户类型的数字化医疗服务包括检查前后的病假条和疾病相关培训等。用户类型通过潜在类别分析确定。考虑到社会经济和人口统计学因素以及个人对医疗系统数字化的态度,使用多项逻辑回归来描述各个群体。

结果

确定了三种类型:拒绝(27.9%)、潜在(53.8%)和积极(18.3%)。积极参与者就业的可能性较小,受教育程度较低,对数字技术的怀疑态度较低。潜在用户是最年轻、受教育程度最高、就业最频繁的群体,比拒绝者的怀疑态度要低。拒绝者是年龄最大的群体,更有可能是女性,社会经济地位更高。

结论

在三种用户类型中发现了社会人口统计学和社会经济方面的差异。因此,可以假设并非所有人群都能从医疗保健数字化趋势中受益。应采取措施加强创新的获取,确保每个人都能从中受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e75/11409736/659f881d0dea/12913_2024_11523_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验