文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

在招募时提醒还是不提醒?对德国在线面板的分析。

To Remind or Not to Remind During Recruitment? An Analysis of an Online Panel in Germany.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.

Institute for General Medicine, Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Sciences, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Public Health. 2024 Mar 20;69:1606770. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606770. eCollection 2024.


DOI:10.3389/ijph.2024.1606770
PMID:38586472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10996063/
Abstract

To explore the role of reminders in recruiting and maintaining participation in an online panel. 50,045 individuals from five German federal states were invited by regular mail to participate in the online study "Health-Related Beliefs and Healthcare Experiences in Germany." Those who did not respond to the first attempt received a postal reminder. Comparisons of sociodemographic characteristics and responses were made between first-attempt respondents and those who enrolled after the second letter. After the initial letter, 2,216 (4.4%, 95%CI: 4.3%-4.6%) registered for the study; after a reminder 1,130 (2.5%, 2.3%-2.6% of those reminded) enrolled. Minor sociodemographic differences were observed between the groups and the content of the responses did not differ. Second-attempt respondents were less likely to participate in subsequent questionnaires: 67.3% of first-attempt vs. 43.3% of second-attempt respondents participated in their fourth survey. Recruitment costs were 79% higher for second-attempt respondents. While reminders increased the number of participants, lower cost-effectiveness and higher attrition of second-attempt respondents support the use of single invitation only for studies with a similar design to ours when the overall participation is low.

摘要

探讨提醒在招募和维持在线小组参与方面的作用。邀请了来自德国五个联邦州的 50045 人通过普通邮件参与在线研究“德国与健康相关的信念和医疗保健经验”。对于未回复第一封邮件的人,会收到一封邮寄提醒。对首次回复者和第二封信后注册者的社会人口统计学特征和回复进行了比较。初始邮件发出后,有 2216 人(4.4%,95%CI:4.3%-4.6%)注册参加研究;提醒后有 1130 人(提醒人中的 2.5%,2.3%-2.6%)注册。两组之间观察到一些细微的社会人口统计学差异,且回复内容没有差异。第二次尝试回复的人不太可能参与后续问卷:47.3%的首次尝试回复者和 43.3%的第二次尝试回复者参加了第四次调查。对于第二次尝试回复者的招募成本要高出 79%。虽然提醒增加了参与者的数量,但成本效益较低,且第二次尝试回复者的退出率较高,这支持对于总体参与率较低的类似设计的研究,仅使用单次邀请,而不使用提醒。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/10996063/678a6dd7ae53/ijph-69-1606770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/10996063/ab5009bc2730/ijph-69-1606770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/10996063/678a6dd7ae53/ijph-69-1606770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/10996063/ab5009bc2730/ijph-69-1606770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a3/10996063/678a6dd7ae53/ijph-69-1606770-g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
To Remind or Not to Remind During Recruitment? An Analysis of an Online Panel in Germany.

Int J Public Health. 2024

[2]
Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR Cancer. 2015-11-24

[3]
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.

Trials. 2021-1-8

[4]
A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.

J Med Internet Res. 2011-9-27

[5]
Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.

BMC Public Health. 2012-3-9

[6]
Effects of a financial incentive on health researchers' response to an online survey: a randomized controlled trial.

J Med Internet Res. 2010-5-10

[7]
Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.

J Med Internet Res. 2018-1-23

[8]
Factors associated with attrition in a longitudinal online study: results from the HaBIDS panel.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017-8-31

[9]
Mail surveys: obsolescent model or valuable instrument in general practice research?

Swiss Med Wkly. 2005-4-2

[10]
Getting a Valid Survey Response From 662 Plastic Surgeons in the 21st Century.

Ann Plast Surg. 2016-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
User profiles in digitalized healthcare: active, potential, and rejecting - a cross-sectional study using latent class analysis.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-9-17

[2]
Climate-sensitive health counselling in Germany: a cross-sectional study about previous participation and preferences in the general public.

BMC Public Health. 2024-6-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
Association between virus variants, vaccination, previous infections, and post-COVID-19 risk.

Int J Infect Dis. 2023-11

[2]
Framework and baseline examination of the German National Cohort (NAKO).

Eur J Epidemiol. 2022-10

[3]
[Reasons and Influencing Factors for the Willingness to Document Preferences Regarding Organ Donation: Results of an Online Survey].

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2022-8

[4]
The effect of home visits as an additional recruitment step on the composition of the final sample: a cross-sectional analysis in two study centers of the German National Cohort (NAKO).

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021-8-23

[5]
Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies.

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021-2-15

[6]
Participants who were difficult to recruit at baseline are less likely to complete a follow-up questionnaire - results from the German National Cohort.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020-7-9

[7]
[COVID-19: Knowledge, risk perception and strategies for handling the pandemic].

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020-8

[8]
How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018-3-5

[9]
Factors associated with attrition in a longitudinal online study: results from the HaBIDS panel.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017-8-31

[10]
An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017-4-26

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索