Mota-Rojas Daniel, Whittaker Alexandra L, Strappini Ana C, Orihuela Agustín, Domínguez-Oliva Adriana, Mora-Medina Patricia, Álvarez-Macías Adolfo, Hernández-Avalos Ismael, Olmos-Hernández Adriana, Reyes-Sotelo Brenda, Grandin Temple
Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Sep 3;11:1456120. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1456120. eCollection 2024.
The present review has two objectives, the first is to investigate the differences in temperament between and breeds and determining the effects on production due to positive treatment and to compare this with negative HAR, by using the Five Domain Model as framework. The second objective is to discuss potential strategies to achieve better HAR when working with cattle. are more reactive and temperamental than cattle. When human animal relationships (HAR) are evaluated, cattle may react with greater intensity. They may be more likely to develop a negative emotional state, especially in extensively raised cattle that are handled only a few times each year. cattle can have positive emotional states when they have frequent positive interactions with people. Interactions with people, both positive and negative, would be in the fourth Domain of the Five Domains model. Cattle that are more reactive during handling may also have lower weight gain, even when they have abundant feed. This would be in the first Domain of Nutrition. When cattle are handled in races and corrals, injuries may be more likely to occur. Injuries and bruises would be in the third Domain of Health. Injuries could be caused by either poor handling practices by people or poor handling facilities. Yelling or electric prod use would be examples of poor HAR. Second Environmental Domain issues may be broken facilities or slick, slippery floors that are associated with falls.
本综述有两个目标,第一个目标是利用五域模型作为框架,研究[品种1]和[品种2]牛在性情上的差异,并确定积极对待对生产的影响,以及将此与消极的人兽关系进行比较。第二个目标是讨论在处理[品种]牛时实现更好的人兽关系的潜在策略。[品种1]牛比[品种2]牛更易反应且性情更敏感。在评估人兽关系(HAR)时,[品种1]牛可能会有更强烈的反应。它们可能更易产生负面情绪状态,尤其是在每年仅被处理几次的粗放饲养的[品种1]牛中。当[品种1]牛与人有频繁的积极互动时,它们可以有积极的情绪状态。与人的互动,无论是积极的还是消极的,都属于五域模型的第四域。在处理过程中反应更强烈的牛,即使有充足的饲料,体重增加也可能更低。这属于营养的第一域。当在通道和畜栏中处理牛时,受伤的可能性可能更高。受伤和擦伤属于健康的第三域。受伤可能是由于人的不良处理操作或不良的处理设施造成的。大喊大叫或使用电棒就是不良人兽关系的例子。第二环境域问题可能是设施损坏或地面光滑易导致摔倒。