Suppr超能文献

身体氧水平测试(BOLT)与高水平训练者的运动表现无关。

Body Oxygen Level Test (BOLT) is not associated with exercise performance in highly-trained individuals.

作者信息

Kowalski Tomasz, Rebis Kinga, Wilk Adrian, Klusiewicz Andrzej, Wiecha Szczepan, Paleczny Bartłomiej

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Institute of Sport - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Physical Education and Health in Biala Podlaska, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2024 Aug 28;15:1430837. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1430837. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The analysis of chemoreflex and baroreflex sensitivity may contribute to optimizing patient care and athletic performance. Breath-holding tests, such as the Body Oxygen Level Test (BOLT), have gained popularity as a feasible way to evaluate the reflex control over the cardiorespiratory system. According to its proponents, the BOLT score reflects the body's sensitivity to carbon dioxide and homeostasis disturbances, providing feedback on exercise tolerance. However, it has not yet been scientifically validated or linked with exercise performance in highly-trained individuals. Therefore, we investigated the association of BOLT scores with the results of standard performance tests in elite athletes.

METHODS

A group of 49 speedskaters performed BOLT, Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT), and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on a cycle ergometer. Peak power, total work, and power drop were measured during WAnT. Time to exhaustion and maximum oxygen uptake were measured during CPET. Spearman's rank correlation and multiple linear regression were performed to analyze the association of BOLT scores with parameters obtained during the tests, age, somatic indices, and training experience.

RESULTS

No significant correlations between BOLT scores and parameters obtained during WAnT and CPET were found, r(47) = -0.172-0.013, = 0.248-0.984. The parameters obtained during the tests, age, somatic indices, and training experience were not significant in multiple linear regression ( = 0.38-0.85). The preliminary regression model showed an of 0.08 and RMSE of 9.78 sec.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings did not demonstrate a significant relationship between BOLT scores and exercise performance. Age, somatic indices, and training experience were not significant in our analysis. It is recommended to interpret BOLT concerning exercise performance in highly-trained populations with a great degree of caution.

摘要

引言

化学反射和压力反射敏感性分析可能有助于优化患者护理和运动表现。屏气测试,如身体氧水平测试(BOLT),作为评估心肺系统反射控制的一种可行方法已受到广泛关注。其支持者认为,BOLT评分反映了身体对二氧化碳和内稳态紊乱的敏感性,提供了关于运动耐力的反馈。然而,它尚未得到科学验证,也未与高水平训练个体的运动表现相关联。因此,我们研究了精英运动员中BOLT评分与标准性能测试结果之间的关联。

方法

一组49名速滑运动员在自行车测力计上进行了BOLT测试、温盖特无氧测试(WAnT)和心肺运动测试(CPET)。在WAnT期间测量峰值功率、总功和功率下降。在CPET期间测量疲劳时间和最大摄氧量。进行Spearman等级相关性分析和多元线性回归分析,以分析BOLT评分与测试期间获得的参数、年龄、身体指标和训练经验之间的关联。

结果

未发现BOLT评分与WAnT和CPET期间获得的参数之间存在显著相关性,r(47) = -0.172 - 0.013,P = 0.248 - 0.984。测试期间获得的参数、年龄、身体指标和训练经验在多元线性回归中均不显著(P = 0.38 - 0.85)。初步回归模型显示R²为0.08,均方根误差为9.78秒。

结论

我们的研究结果未表明BOLT评分与运动表现之间存在显著关系。在我们的分析中,年龄、身体指标和训练经验均不显著。建议在高度训练的人群中,对BOLT与运动表现的关系要极为谨慎地进行解读。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd8/11406178/eb3fd87872ae/fphys-15-1430837-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验