Kazemi Mohammad, Froutan Razieh, Bagheri Moghadam Ahmad
Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran Email:
Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran Email:
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 21;12(1):e59. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2331. eCollection 2024.
Preparing patients for extubation from mechanical ventilation (MV) necessitates focused respiratory muscle strengthening. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of threshold inspiratory muscle training (IMT) and positive expiratory pressure (PEP) exercises on outcomes of patients who underwent MV in intensive care unit (ICU).
This randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2023 at the ICUs of Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Participants were allocated to either intervention or control group (each comprising 35 patients) through block randomization. The intervention group received standard daily chest physiotherapy as well as targeted inspiratory and expiratory muscle strengthening exercises using the threshold IMT/PEP device, administered twice daily over one week. The control group received standard daily chest physiotherapy alone. Finally, the outcomes (lung compliance, duration of intubation, extubation success rate, and diaphragmatic metrics) of the two groups were compared.
70 patients with the mean age of 56.10 ± 14.15 (range: 28.00-85.00) years were randomly divided into two groups (50% male). Significant improvements were observed in the intervention group regarding pulmonary compliance values (35.62 ± 4.43 vs. 30.85 ± 6.93; p= 0.001), peak expiratory flow (PEF) (55.20 ± 10.23 vs. 47.80 ± 11.26; p = 0.002), and maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) (33.40 ± 4.25 vs. 30.08 ± 6.08; p = 0.01) compared to the control group. Diaphragm inspiratory thickness (0.29 ± 0.03 vs. 0.26 ± 0.04; p = 0.001), diaphragm expiratory thickness (0.22 ± 0.03 vs. 0.20 ± 0.04; p = 0.006) and motion (1.61 ± .29 vs. 1.48 ± .21; p = 0.04) also exhibited significant differences between the two groups. Extubation success rate was higher in the intervention group (68.60% vs. 40%; p = 0.01). The duration of mechanical ventilation was 15.14±7.07 days in the intervention group and 17.34±7.87 days in the control group (p = 0.20). The mean extubation time was 7.00 ± 1.88 days for the intervention group and 9.00 ± 2.00 days for the control (p < 0.001).
Threshold IMT/PEP device exercises effectively enhance respiratory muscle strength, diaphragm thickness, and reduce ventilator dependency. These findings support their potential for inclusion in rehabilitation programs for ICU patients.
让接受机械通气(MV)的患者为拔管做好准备需要有针对性地加强呼吸肌力量。本研究旨在评估阈限吸气肌训练(IMT)和呼气正压(PEP)练习对重症监护病房(ICU)中接受MV治疗的患者预后的影响。
这项随机对照试验于2023年在伊朗马什哈德伊玛目礼萨医院的重症监护病房进行。通过区组随机化将参与者分配到干预组或对照组(每组35名患者)。干预组接受标准的每日胸部物理治疗,以及使用阈限IMT/PEP设备进行有针对性的吸气和呼气肌强化练习,每天进行两次,持续一周。对照组仅接受标准的每日胸部物理治疗。最后,比较两组的预后(肺顺应性、插管持续时间、拔管成功率和膈肌指标)。
70名平均年龄为56.10±14.15岁(范围:28.00 - 85.00岁)的患者被随机分为两组(50%为男性)。与对照组相比,干预组在肺顺应性值(35.62±4.43 vs. 30.85±6.93;p = 0.001)、呼气峰值流速(PEF)(55.20±10.23 vs. 47.80±11.26;p = 0.002)和最大吸气压力(MIP)(33.40±4.25 vs. 30.08±6.08;p = 0.01)方面有显著改善。两组在膈肌吸气厚度(0.29±0.03 vs. 0.26±0.04;p = 0.001)、膈肌呼气厚度(0.22±0.03 vs. 0.20±0.04;p = 0.006)和运动(1.61±.29 vs. 1.48±.21;p = 0.04)方面也存在显著差异。干预组的拔管成功率更高(68.60% vs. 40%;p = 0.01)。干预组的机械通气持续时间为15.14±7.07天,对照组为17.34±7.87天(p = 0.20)。干预组的平均拔管时间为7.00±1.88天,对照组为9.00±2.00天(p < 0.001)。
阈限IMT/PEP设备练习可有效增强呼吸肌力量、膈肌厚度,并减少对呼吸机的依赖。这些发现支持将其纳入ICU患者康复计划的可能性。