Suppr超能文献

一份用于评估乳腺癌后癌症相关疲劳的整体评估问卷的表面效度和内容效度

Face and content validity of a holistic assessment questionnaire to assess cancer-related fatigue after breast cancer.

作者信息

Wijlens Kim A E, Witteveen Annemieke, Beenhakker Lian, Siemerink Ester J M, Achterkamp Reinoud, Siesling Sabine, Vollenbroek-Hutten Miriam M R, Bode Christina

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, ZiekenhuisGroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fatigue. 2024 Aug 18;12(4):293-307. doi: 10.1080/21641846.2024.2389007. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) affects the quality of life after breast cancer. In a previous study, we developed a 72-item questionnaire that assesses CRF from a holistic point of view; named the Holistic Assessment of CRF (HA-CRF) questionnaire. The current study assessed the face and content validity of the HA-CRF questionnaire.

METHODS

Using a mixed-method approach, ten breast cancer survivors (BCS) did a cognitive walkthrough of the HA-CRF via an app followed by a semi-structured interview about relevancy and essentiality (qualitative). In addition, ten health care professionals (HCPs) assessed the relevancy, clarity, and essentiality of each item via a questionnaire (quantitative).

RESULTS

BCS indicated minor textual improvement for four items and six items were not completely clear. The app was considered easy to use and the HC-CRF was on average completed in 18 minutes. The HA-CRF questionnaire provided openness about fatigue and gave the feeling of being heard. The items were helpful and induced self-awareness. HCPs indicated 71% of items being very clear or minor revisions proposed by the minority, with 64% of items being essential and 92% considered relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

The HA-CRF showed good face and excellent content validity. Further research is needed to assess its ability to monitor in daily life.

摘要

背景与目的

癌症相关疲劳(CRF)会影响乳腺癌患者的生活质量。在之前的一项研究中,我们编制了一份包含72个条目的问卷,从整体角度评估CRF,即癌症相关疲劳整体评估(HA-CRF)问卷。本研究评估了HA-CRF问卷的表面效度和内容效度。

方法

采用混合方法,十名乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)通过一款应用程序对HA-CRF进行认知预演,随后进行关于相关性和必要性的半结构化访谈(定性研究)。此外,十名医疗保健专业人员(HCP)通过问卷评估每个条目的相关性、清晰度和必要性(定量研究)。

结果

乳腺癌幸存者指出四个条目在文字上需稍作改进,六个条目不完全清晰。该应用程序被认为易于使用,HA-CRF问卷平均完成时间为18分钟。HA-CRF问卷为疲劳问题提供了开放性,让人有被倾听的感觉。这些条目很有帮助,能引发自我意识。医疗保健专业人员指出,71%的条目非常清晰或少数人提出了轻微修改建议,64%的条目至关重要,92%的条目被认为相关。

结论

HA-CRF显示出良好的表面效度和出色的内容效度。需要进一步研究以评估其在日常生活中的监测能力。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire.制定和评估调查问卷的实用指南。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021 Mar 2;12(2):266-275. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验