• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定和评估调查问卷的实用指南。

Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire.

作者信息

Kishore Kamal, Jaswal Vidushi, Kulkarni Vinay, De Dipankar

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

Department of Psychology, MCM DAV College for Women, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021 Mar 2;12(2):266-275. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20
PMID:33959523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8088187/
Abstract

Life expectancy is gradually increasing due to continuously improving medical and nonmedical interventions. The increasing life expectancy is desirable but brings in issues such as impairment of quality of life, disease perception, cognitive health, and mental health. Thus, questionnaire building and data collection through the questionnaires have become an active area of research. However, questionnaire development can be challenging and suboptimal in the absence of careful planning and user-friendly literature guide. Keeping in mind the intricacies of constructing a questionnaire, researchers need to carefully plan, document, and follow systematic steps to build a reliable and valid questionnaire. Additionally, questionnaire development is technical, jargon-filled, and is not a part of most of the graduate and postgraduate training. Therefore, this article is an attempt to initiate an understanding of the complexities of the questionnaire fundamentals, technical challenges, and sequential flow of steps to build a reliable and valid questionnaire.

摘要

由于医疗和非医疗干预措施的不断改进,预期寿命正在逐渐增加。预期寿命的增加是令人期望的,但也带来了诸如生活质量受损、疾病认知、认知健康和心理健康等问题。因此,通过问卷进行问卷构建和数据收集已成为一个活跃的研究领域。然而,在缺乏精心规划和用户友好的文献指南的情况下,问卷开发可能具有挑战性且不够理想。考虑到构建问卷的复杂性,研究人员需要仔细规划、记录并遵循系统步骤来构建可靠且有效的问卷。此外,问卷开发具有技术性、充斥着行话,并且不是大多数研究生和研究生培训的一部分。因此,本文旨在帮助读者了解问卷基本原理的复杂性、技术挑战以及构建可靠且有效问卷的步骤顺序流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e500/8088187/b7ee916a4add/IDOJ-12-266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e500/8088187/3715a8669583/IDOJ-12-266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e500/8088187/b7ee916a4add/IDOJ-12-266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e500/8088187/3715a8669583/IDOJ-12-266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e500/8088187/b7ee916a4add/IDOJ-12-266-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire.制定和评估调查问卷的实用指南。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021 Mar 2;12(2):266-275. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
2
Essential elements of questionnaire design and development.问卷设计与开发的基本要素。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Feb;16(2):234-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x.
3
Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷简体中文版对退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者的信度和效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):820-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000273.
4
Development of a questionnaire measuring student attitudes to working and living in rural areas.一份衡量学生对在农村地区工作和生活态度的调查问卷的编制。
Rural Remote Health. 2005 Jan-Mar;5(1):327. Epub 2005 Mar 8.
5
Methodological studies of orofacial aesthetics, orofacial function and oral health-related quality of life.口腔面部美学、口腔面部功能及口腔健康相关生活质量的方法学研究。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2010(204):11-98.
6
Translational Metabolomics of Head Injury: Exploring Dysfunctional Cerebral Metabolism with Ex Vivo NMR Spectroscopy-Based Metabolite Quantification头部损伤的转化代谢组学:基于体外核磁共振波谱的代谢物定量分析探索脑代谢功能障碍
7
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
8
The Herdecke Questionnaire on Quality of Life (HLQ): validation of factorial structure and development of a short form within a naturopathy treated in-patient collective.赫德克生活质量问卷(HLQ):在接受自然疗法的住院患者群体中对因子结构的验证及简版的编制
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Jul 8;3:40. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-40.
9
Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire: reliability and factor structure with Master's in Nursing graduates.研究生研究经历问卷:护理学硕士毕业生的信度与因子结构
J Adv Nurs. 2008 May;62(4):487-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04619.x.
10
Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals.一种用于测量医护人员临床沟通技能的自我效能量表(SE-12)的开发与验证
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0798-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: Insights based on physiotherapists messages.下背痛患者对安慰性信息的认知:基于物理治疗师信息的见解
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0323580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323580. eCollection 2025.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Newly Developed Patient-Reported Experience Measures Tool for Effectively Assessing the Quality of Care and Patient Safety During Antenatal Services.新开发的患者报告体验测量工具在有效评估产前服务期间护理质量和患者安全方面的有效性和可靠性。
J Patient Exp. 2025 Aug 21;12:23743735251371769. doi: 10.1177/23743735251371769. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Pemphigus Oral Lesions Intensity Score (POLIS): A Novel Scoring System for Assessment of Severity of Oral Lesions in Pemphigus Vulgaris.天疱疮口腔病变强度评分(POLIS):一种评估寻常型天疱疮口腔病变严重程度的新型评分系统。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Sep 2;7:449. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00449. eCollection 2020.
2
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
3
When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts.
Development of validated, context-specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) tools to enhance quality and patient safety in India.
开发经过验证的、针对特定情境的患者报告体验测量(PREMs)工具,以提高印度的医疗质量和患者安全。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Aug 7;14(3):e003345. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003345.
4
Development of the Common Cognitive Complaints after Concussion (C4) questionnaire: a treatment-planning tool for military service members and veterans with mild traumatic brain injury.脑震荡后常见认知主诉(C4)问卷的开发:一种用于轻度创伤性脑损伤军人和退伍军人的治疗规划工具。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1621265. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1621265. eCollection 2025.
5
Crafting an effective questionnaire: An essential prerequisite of engaging surveys.设计一份有效的问卷:开展调查的一项基本前提。
Perspect Clin Res. 2025 Jul-Sep;16(3):118-126. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_157_24. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
6
Development of a cannabis health literacy questionnaire: preliminary validation using the Rasch model.大麻健康素养问卷的编制:基于拉施模型的初步验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):2539. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23770-5.
7
Association of Post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis pathogenesis with prolonged sunlight (ultraviolet radiations) exposure in VL endemic population of Bihar.比哈尔邦内脏利什曼病(VL)流行地区,黑热病后皮肤利什曼病的发病机制与长期暴露于阳光(紫外线辐射)之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 17;15(1):25916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08738-0.
8
Response to Article: "Self-Assessment of Medical Ethics and Professionalism: Comparison Between Preclinical and Clinical Medical Students".对文章《医学伦理与职业素养的自我评估:临床前与临床医学生的比较》的回应
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Jun 30;12:23821205251355363. doi: 10.1177/23821205251355363. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
Assessment of the effect of social media use on medical students' academic performance: cross-sectional study from Jordan.社交媒体使用对医学生学业成绩影响的评估:来自约旦的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 13;13:1551905. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1551905. eCollection 2025.
10
Advancing breast cancer rehabilitation: a novel tool for assessing physical morbidity risk.推进乳腺癌康复:一种评估身体发病风险的新工具。
Oncologist. 2025 May 8;30(5). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf060.
何时以及如何在随机临床试验中使用多重插补来处理缺失数据——附流程图的实用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1.
4
Very Simple Structure: An Alternative Procedure For Estimating The Optimal Number Of Interpretable Factors.非常简单的结构:一种估计可解释因子最优数量的替代方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1979 Oct 1;14(4):403-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_2.
5
Combining Parallel and Exploratory Factor Analysis in Identifying Relationship Scales in Secondary Data.在二次数据中识别关系量表时结合平行因子分析和探索性因子分析
Marriage Fam Rev. 2015;51(5):385-395. doi: 10.1080/01494929.2015.1059785.
6
Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.设计与实施内容效度研究:开发一种用于测量以患者为中心的沟通的工具。
J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun 1;4(2):165-78. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017. eCollection 2015 Jun.
7
On the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis for ordered categorical data.关于有序分类数据探索性因子分析中保留因子的数量
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Sep;47(3):756-72. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0499-2.
8
Effect of questionnaire length, personalisation and reminder type on response rate to a complex postal survey: randomised controlled trial.问卷长度、个性化和提醒类型对复杂邮寄调查响应率的影响:随机对照试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 May 6;11:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-62.
9
Exploring the Sensitivity of Horn's Parallel Analysis to the Distributional Form of Random Data.探究霍恩平行分析对随机数据分布形式的敏感性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2009 May;44(3):362-388. doi: 10.1080/00273170902938969.
10
Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration.临床试验中的问卷:最佳设计和管理指南。
Trials. 2010 Jan 11;11:2. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-2.