Suppr超能文献

心理治疗师对开放式病历的看法:来自德国的一项在线调查。

Psychotherapists' views on open notes: An online survey from Germany.

作者信息

Schwarz Julian, Neumann Katharina, Meier-Diedrich Eva, Mühlensiepen Felix, Hochwarter Stefan, Blease Charlotte

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Mental Health, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.

Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Sep 11;10:20552076241271813. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271813. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In an increasing number of countries, patients are given online record access (ORA) to their clinical notes ("open notes"). In many places, psychotherapy notes are exempt, even if patients explicitly wish to read them. Previous research suggests that psychotherapists (PTs) have reservations that are not yet fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the attitudes and perceived effects of open notes on psychotherapeutic care, patients, and individual psychotherapeutic practice in Germany.

METHODS

Psychological and medical therapists were invited to participate in a national online survey. Sociodemographic characteristics such as gender, age, professional group, and psychotherapeutic school were gathered. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the 51-item survey.

RESULTS

129 PTs completed the survey. Only a small proportion of respondents (30 out of 129, 23.3%) suspected that open notes would improve the efficiency of psychotherapeutic care. On the one hand, participants assumed that patients gain more control over their treatment (59 out of 129, 45.7%) and are better able to remember therapy goals (55 out of 129, 42.6%), although this was considered unlikely to lead to greater engagement in the therapy process (94 out of 129, 72.9%). On the other hand, PTs expected patients to misunderstand their notes, feel offended (98 out of 129, 76.0%), and approach them with questions (107 out of 129, 82.9%) or requests for changes (94 out of 129, 72.9%). The respondents also anticipated being less honest when writing (95 out of 129, 73.6%) and reported they needed more time for documentation (99 out of 129, 76.7%). A meaningful use of open notes for working with relatives was envisaged (101 out of 129, 78.3%).

CONCLUSION

PTs in Germany tend to have a negative attitude towards patients' ORA on open notes. Further research on clinical efficacy and feasibility is necessary to demonstrate whether open notes add value in the context of psychotherapy.

摘要

背景

在越来越多的国家,患者可以在线访问其临床记录(“开放病历”)。在许多地方,心理治疗记录是豁免的,即使患者明确希望阅读。先前的研究表明,心理治疗师(PTs)持有尚未完全理解的保留意见。

目的

调查开放病历对德国心理治疗护理、患者和个体心理治疗实践的态度及感知影响。

方法

邀请心理和医学治疗师参与全国在线调查。收集了性别、年龄、专业组和心理治疗学派等社会人口学特征。使用描述性统计分析这份包含51个条目的调查问卷。

结果

129名心理治疗师完成了调查。只有一小部分受访者(129人中的30人,23.3%)怀疑开放病历会提高心理治疗护理的效率。一方面,参与者认为患者对自己的治疗有更多控制权(129人中的59人,45.7%),并且能更好地记住治疗目标(129人中的55人,42.6%),尽管这被认为不太可能导致患者更多地参与治疗过程(129人中的94人,72.9%)。另一方面,心理治疗师预计患者会误解他们的记录,感到被冒犯(129人中的98人,76.0%),并带着问题(129人中的107人,82.9%)或更改请求(129人中的94人,72.9%)来找他们。受访者还预计在书写时会不那么诚实(129人中的95人,73.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab05/11406606/645fcf80de0f/10.1177_20552076241271813-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验