• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解护士如何有效利用社交媒体来提高公众参与度、促进招募以及传播临床研究试验的影响力。

Understanding how nurses can effectively utilise social media for increasing public involvement, recruitment and impact dissemination of Clinical Research Trials.

作者信息

Jackson Jessica Eve, Moreton Joshua, Barnett Nicola, Hurst Matthew

机构信息

Associate Professor of Babies, Children and Young People's Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.

Researcher, College of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK.

出版信息

J Res Nurs. 2024 Aug;29(4-5):321-331. doi: 10.1177/17449871241246963. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1177/17449871241246963
PMID:39291220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11403991/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The methodologies for clinical research trials are evolving to greater usage of social media platforms, providing opportunities to incorporate smart technologies in their delivery. Research Nurses should consider how they can utilise platforms for public engagement in trials.

AIM

To explore the experiences of social media platforms and clinical research trials in a healthy population group, to gain insight into how clinical researchers can utilise these platforms professionally and ethically.

METHODS

Using a critical realist qualitative focus group design with template analysis, we recruited 16 healthy members of the public aged 18-75 years. The data expands upon their thoughts and behaviours regarding social media platforms with their understanding of clinical research.

RESULTS

Three main themes along with their specific subthemes (1) Design: Patient and Public Involvement (Subtheme: Understanding of clinical research, Diversity of social media users), (2) Implementation: Recruitment to active studies, (Subtheme: Motivators for volunteering, Trustworthy), (3) Dissemination: Impact and Awareness of Results, (Subtheme: Information overload, Motivations for users to share information).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has highlighted the need to consider the way different population groups use social media platforms and the information they share when looking to engage them in clinical research trials.

摘要

背景

临床试验的方法正在不断发展,越来越多地使用社交媒体平台,这为在试验实施过程中融入智能技术提供了机会。研究护士应考虑如何利用这些平台促进公众参与试验。

目的

探讨健康人群对社交媒体平台和临床试验的体验,以深入了解临床研究人员如何专业且合乎道德地利用这些平台。

方法

采用批判性现实主义定性焦点小组设计并进行模板分析,我们招募了16名年龄在18至75岁之间的健康公众成员。数据围绕他们对社交媒体平台的想法和行为以及对临床研究的理解展开。

结果

出现了三个主要主题及其具体子主题:(1)设计:患者和公众参与(子主题:对临床研究的理解、社交媒体用户的多样性),(2)实施:招募参与现行研究(子主题:志愿参与的动机、可信度),(3)传播:结果的影响和认知(子主题:信息过载、用户分享信息的动机)。

结论

本研究强调,在寻求让不同人群参与临床试验时,需要考虑他们使用社交媒体平台的方式以及他们分享的信息。

相似文献

1
Understanding how nurses can effectively utilise social media for increasing public involvement, recruitment and impact dissemination of Clinical Research Trials.了解护士如何有效利用社交媒体来提高公众参与度、促进招募以及传播临床研究试验的影响力。
J Res Nurs. 2024 Aug;29(4-5):321-331. doi: 10.1177/17449871241246963. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.
4
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
Self-Set Goals: Autistic Adults Facilitating Their Self-Determination Through Digitally Mediated Social Stories.自我设定目标:成年自闭症患者通过数字媒介社交故事促进自我决定
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):25-38. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0063. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Factors within the clinical encounter that impact upon risk assessment within child and adolescent mental health services: a rapid realist synthesis.临床接触中的影响儿童和青少年心理健康服务风险评估的因素:快速现实主义综合评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(1):1-107. doi: 10.3310/VKTY5822.

引用本文的文献

1
Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.当前向研究参与者传播健康研究结果的全球实践及对未来研究的启示:一项系统综述。
PLoS Med. 2025 Aug 14;22(8):e1004569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004569. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews.信息疫情与健康错误信息:系统综述。
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Sep 1;100(9):544-561. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287654. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
Social Media Use for Research Participant Recruitment: Integrative Literature Review.社交媒体在研究参与者招募中的应用:综合文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 4;24(8):e38015. doi: 10.2196/38015.
3
Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media: Rapid Review.社交媒体上关于 COVID-19 疫苗的错误信息:快速综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 4;24(8):e37367. doi: 10.2196/37367.
4
Ethical Issues in Social Media Recruitment for Clinical Studies: Ethical Analysis and Framework.社交媒体在临床研究招募中的伦理问题:伦理分析与框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 3;24(5):e31231. doi: 10.2196/31231.
5
Engaging Institutional Stakeholders to Develop and Implement Guidelines for Recruiting Participants in Research Studies Using Social Media: Mixed Methods, Multi-Phase Process.利用社交媒体招募研究参与者的指南制定与实施:混合方法、多阶段过程中的机构利益相关者参与。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 8;23(10):e23312. doi: 10.2196/23312.
6
Experiences of people seen in an acute hospital setting by a liaison mental health service: responses from an online survey.急性医院环境中联络心理健康服务所观察到的人群的体验:来自在线调查的回应。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 5;21(1):1050. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06974-4.
7
College students' knowledge and attitudes toward clinical trials and their relationship with willingness to participate in COVID-19 trials or vaccines.大学生对临床试验的认知与态度及其与参与COVID-19试验或疫苗意愿的关系。
J Am Coll Health. 2023 Aug-Sep;71(6):1643-1645. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1947840. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
8
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体健康类错误信息的流行情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
9
Social media recruitment for mental health research: A systematic review.社交媒体在心理健康研究中的招募作用:系统综述。
Compr Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;103:152197. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152197. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
"Social Media Misinformation"-An Epidemic within the COVID-19 Pandemic.“社交媒体虚假信息”——新冠疫情中的一场流行病。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Aug;103(2):920-921. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0592. Epub 2020 Jun 12.