• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对高度焦虑父母的无指导模块化在线干预措施在预防其子女焦虑方面的有效性:一项平行组随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of an unguided modular online intervention for highly anxious parents in preventing anxiety in their children: a parallel group randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Dunn Abby, Alvarez James, Arbon Amy, Bremner Stephen, Elsby-Pearson Chloe, Emsley Richard, Jones Christopher, Lawrence Peter, Lester Kathryn J, Morson Natalie, Simner Julia, Thomson Abigail, Cartwright-Hatton Sam

机构信息

University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.

University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Sep 4;45:101038. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101038. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101038
PMID:39291249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11405817/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children whose parents have anxiety problems are at increased risk of developing anxiety themselves. Parenting behaviors are a contributing factor to intergenerational transmission. Interventions which seek to limit anxiogenic parenting behaviors have shown potential in reducing anxiety in offspring but are not widely accessible. This prevention trial aimed to establish the effectiveness of an unguided modular online intervention for highly anxious parents in preventing anxiety in their children.

METHODS

A parallel group, block-randomised controlled trial of unblinded participants in a 1:1 ratio was conducted to compare efficacy of the online course compared to a no-intervention control. The intervention comprised 8 modules, of approximately 20 min each, and participants progressed through the course at their own pace. The study was conducted entirely online with a self-referred UK-based community sample of parents (child 2-11 years) with substantial anxiety. The primary outcome measure was change in parent-reported child anxiety, as measured by the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale-Parent Report (SCAS-P) or Spence Pre-School Anxiety Scale-Parent Report (Preschool SCAS). Secondary outcomes were child internalising, externalising, and attentional symptoms (Pediatric Symptom Checklist), and parent anxiety (SCARED-Adult). Analyses using complete case analysis following intention to treat principles investigated intervention effects at 6 months (primary analysis) and additionally at 9 to 25-months' follow-up. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.GovNCT04755933, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04755933.

FINDINGS

1811 participants (intervention = 900; control = 911; 92.7% (1677/1810) female; 85.3% (1535/1800) White-British; 66.8% (1201/1799) university educated). Participant retention (based on primary outcome completion) at T2 (6-months post consent) was 67.6% overall (n = 1224) and substantially lower in the intervention arm 57.3% ((516/900) control = 77.8% (708/910)). Child anxiety was lower in the intervention group compared to control at 6-month follow-up (adjusted effect size estimate -0.15 (95% CI: -0.23 to -0.08, p < 0.001). There was very strong evidence that those in the intervention arm had lowered child anxiety (standardised SCAS score) compared to the control arm, with an effect size (Cohen's d) of -0.16 (95% CI: -0.23 to -0.08, p < 0.001). The difference in standardised Spence Child Anxiety Scale score between the arms was -0.15 standard deviations. On the original scales for SCAS-P (0-114) and Preschool SCAS (0-112), this corresponds to a reduction of -2.38 (95% CI: -3.59 to -1.16) and -2.68 (95% CI: -4.05 to -1.31), respectively. No reported harms.

INTERPRETATION

A clinically unsupported online intervention designed for parents with high levels of anxiety is effective in reducing anxiety and internalising symptoms in their children, and also anxiety in parents. Given the low resource intensity of this intervention, and the positive effects reported here, these findings suggest it has promise in limiting the intergenerational transmission of severe anxiety.

FUNDING

This work was supported by Kavli Trust (grant 38/19).

摘要

背景

父母有焦虑问题的孩子自身患焦虑症的风险更高。养育行为是代际传播的一个促成因素。旨在限制产生焦虑的养育行为的干预措施已显示出在降低后代焦虑方面的潜力,但尚未广泛普及。这项预防试验旨在确定一种针对高度焦虑父母的无指导模块化在线干预措施在预防其子女焦虑方面的有效性。

方法

进行了一项平行组、整群随机对照试验,参与者不设盲,按1:1比例进行分组,以比较在线课程与无干预对照组的疗效。干预包括8个模块,每个模块约20分钟,参与者可按照自己的节奏完成课程。该研究完全在线进行,样本为来自英国的自我推荐的有严重焦虑情绪的父母群体(孩子年龄在2至11岁)。主要结局指标是父母报告的孩子焦虑程度的变化,通过斯宾斯儿童焦虑量表父母报告版(SCAS-P)或斯宾斯学前焦虑量表父母报告版(学前SCAS)进行测量。次要结局指标包括孩子的内化、外化和注意力症状(儿童症状清单)以及父母的焦虑程度(SCARED成人版)。按照意向性分析原则,采用完全病例分析方法,在6个月时(主要分析)以及9至25个月的随访中调查干预效果。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.GovNCT04755933,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04755933。

研究结果

1811名参与者(干预组 = 900人;对照组 = 911人;92.7%(1677/1810)为女性;85.3%(1535/1800)为英国白人;66.8%(1201/1799)受过大学教育)。在T2(同意后6个月)时,基于主要结局指标完成情况的参与者留存率总体为67.6%(n = 1224),干预组的留存率显著较低,为57.3%((516/900),对照组为77.8%(708/910))。在6个月的随访中,干预组孩子的焦虑程度低于对照组(调整后的效应量估计值为 -0.15(95%置信区间:-0.23至 -0.08,p < 0.001))。有非常有力的证据表明,与对照组相比,干预组孩子的焦虑程度(标准化SCAS评分)有所降低,效应量(科恩d值)为 -0.16(95%置信区间:-0.23至 -0.08,p < 0.001)。两组之间标准化斯宾斯儿童焦虑量表评分的差异为 -0.15个标准差。在SCAS-P(0 - 114)和学前SCAS(0 - 112)的原始量表上,这分别相当于降低了 -2.38(95%置信区间:-3.59至 -1.16)和 -2.68(95%置信区间:-4.05至 -1.31)。未报告有不良事件。

解读

一种为焦虑程度高的父母设计的未经临床验证的在线干预措施,在降低其子女的焦虑和内化症状以及父母自身的焦虑方面是有效的。鉴于该干预措施资源投入低,且报告了积极效果,这些发现表明它在限制严重焦虑的代际传播方面具有前景。

资助

这项工作得到了卡弗里信托基金(拨款38/19)的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71b/11405817/bf5e89b74f60/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71b/11405817/ecf66b97da9b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71b/11405817/4abf1100f0ec/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71b/11405817/bf5e89b74f60/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71b/11405817/ecf66b97da9b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71b/11405817/4abf1100f0ec/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c71b/11405817/bf5e89b74f60/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of an unguided modular online intervention for highly anxious parents in preventing anxiety in their children: a parallel group randomised controlled trial.一项针对高度焦虑父母的无指导模块化在线干预措施在预防其子女焦虑方面的有效性:一项平行组随机对照试验。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Sep 4;45:101038. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101038. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Effectiveness of a Web-Based Intervention to Prevent Anxiety in the Children of Parents With Anxiety: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的干预措施预防焦虑症父母子女焦虑的效果:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 10;11(11):e40707. doi: 10.2196/40707.
3
Supporting Parents & Kids Through Lockdown Experiences (SPARKLE): A digital parenting support app implemented in an ongoing general population cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.支持父母和孩子度过封锁期(SPARKLE):在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在一项正在进行的一般人群队列研究中实施的数字育儿支持应用程序:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 10;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05226-4.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
6
A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12-36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT.视频反馈式育儿干预预防 12-36 月龄高危儿童持久行为问题:健康启动,快乐启动 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(29):1-84. doi: 10.3310/hta25290.
7
Online remote behavioural intervention for tics in 9- to 17-year-olds: the ORBIT RCT with embedded process and economic evaluation.9 至 17 岁青少年抽动在线远程行为干预:嵌入过程和经济评价的 ORBIT RCT
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Oct;27(18):1-120. doi: 10.3310/CPMS3211.
8
Parenting Resilient Kids (PaRK), an online parenting program to prevent anxiety and depression problems in primary school-aged children: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.培养有适应力的孩子(PaRK),一项预防小学年龄段儿童焦虑和抑郁问题的在线育儿项目:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Apr 19;19(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2605-8.
9
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an adapted intervention for preschoolers with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities displaying behaviours that challenge: the EPICC-ID RCT.针对有中度至重度智力残疾且表现出挑战性行为的学龄前儿童的适应性干预的临床和成本效益:EPICC-ID RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(6):1-94. doi: 10.3310/JKTY6144.
10
A Tailored Web-Based Intervention to Improve Parenting Risk and Protective Factors for Adolescent Depression and Anxiety Problems: Postintervention Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项基于网络的个性化干预措施,旨在改善青少年抑郁和焦虑问题的养育风险及保护因素:一项随机对照试验的干预后结果
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 19;20(1):e17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9139.

本文引用的文献

1
Methods for Navigating the Mobile Mental Health App Landscape for Clinical Use.临床使用的移动心理健康应用程序领域的导航方法。
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2023 May 24:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s40501-023-00288-4.
2
The effect of digital health interventions on postpartum depression or anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.数字健康干预对产后抑郁或焦虑的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan;230(1):12-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.028. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
Editorial Perspective: When is a 'small effect' actually large and impactful?
编辑视角:何时“小效应”实际上是大且有影响力的?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;64(11):1643-1647. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13817. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Providing Human Support for the Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Meta-review.提供数字心理健康干预措施使用的人力支持:系统元综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 6;25:e42864. doi: 10.2196/42864.
5
Effectiveness of a Web-Based Intervention to Prevent Anxiety in the Children of Parents With Anxiety: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的干预措施预防焦虑症父母子女焦虑的效果:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 10;11(11):e40707. doi: 10.2196/40707.
6
Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间 204 个国家和地区的抑郁和焦虑障碍的全球患病率和负担。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1700-1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
7
School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.学校为基础的抑郁和焦虑预防计划:最新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Nov;89:102079. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102079. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
8
Two decades of digital interventions for anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effectiveness.二十年来针对焦虑障碍的数字干预措施:治疗效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(2):567-579. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001999. Epub 2021 May 28.
9
Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年焦虑症的认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 16;11(11):CD013162. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013162.pub2.
10
Attrition and adherence in smartphone-delivered interventions for mental health problems: A systematic and meta-analytic review.智能手机干预精神健康问题的脱落和坚持情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;88(1):1-13. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000459. Epub 2019 Nov 7.