Bridge Laboratory, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Pharmacy, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 18;13(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02648-4.
The Brazilian Ministry of Health has developed and provided the Citizen's Electronic Health Record (PEC e-SUS APS), a health information system freely available for utilization by all municipalities. Given the substantial financial investment being made to enhance the quality of health services in the country, it is crucial to understand how users evaluate this product. Consequently, this scoping review aims to map studies that have evaluated the PEC e-SUS APS.
This scoping review is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) framework, as well as by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Checklist extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The research question was framed based on the "CoCoPop" mnemonic (Condition, Context, Population). The final question posed is, "How has the Citizen's Electronic Health Record (PEC e-SUS APS) been evaluated?" The search strategy will be executed across various databases (LILACS, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Digital Library), along with gray literature from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global and Google Scholar, with assistance from a professional healthcare librarian skilled in supporting systematic reviews. The database search will encompass the period from 2013 to 2024. Articles included will be selected by three independent reviewers in two stages, and the findings will undergo a descriptive analysis and synthesis following a "narrative review" approach. Independent reviewers will chart the data as outlined in the literature.
The implementation process for the PEC e-SUS APS can be influenced by the varying characteristics of the over 5500 Brazilian municipalities. These factors and other challenges encountered by health professionals and managers may prove pivotal for a municipality's adoption of the PEC e-SUS APS system. With the literature mapping to be obtained from this review, vital insights into how users have evaluated the PEC will be obtained.
The protocol has been registered prospectively at the Open Science Framework platform under the number 10.17605/OSF.IO/NPKRU.
巴西卫生部开发并提供了公民电子健康记录（PEC e-SUS APS），这是一个免费供所有城市使用的健康信息系统。鉴于国家在提高卫生服务质量方面投入了大量资金，了解用户如何评价该产品至关重要。因此，本范围综述旨在绘制评估 PEC e-SUS APS 的研究。
本范围综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目（PRISMA-P）框架以及系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目清单（PRISMA-ScR）。研究问题是基于“CoCoPop”助记符（条件、背景、人群）来构建的。提出的最终问题是，“公民电子健康记录（PEC e-SUS APS）是如何评估的？”搜索策略将在各种数据库（LILACS、PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science、ACM 数字图书馆和 IEEE 数字图书馆）以及 ProQuest 论文和全球谷歌学术的灰色文献中执行，由一位精通支持系统评价的专业医疗保健图书馆员协助。数据库搜索将涵盖 2013 年至 2024 年的时间段。将由三位独立审稿人分两个阶段对文章进行选择，研究结果将按照“叙述性综述”方法进行描述性分析和综合。独立审稿人将按照文献中的规定对数据进行图表绘制。
PEC e-SUS APS 的实施过程可能会受到巴西 5500 多个城市的不同特征的影响。这些因素以及卫生专业人员和管理人员遇到的其他挑战可能对一个城市采用 PEC e-SUS APS 系统至关重要。通过本次综述获得的文献图谱，可以深入了解用户对 PEC 的评价。
该方案已在开放科学框架平台上进行了前瞻性注册，编号为 10.17605/OSF.IO/NPKRU。
