• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Opioid-specific harm reduction in the emergency department: how staff provide harm reduction and contextual factors that impact their capacity to engage in harm reduction practice.急诊科阿片类药物特异性危害减少策略:医护人员如何提供危害减少措施,以及影响其进行危害减少实践能力的相关因素。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Sep 18;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01088-6.
2
How an emergency department is organized to provide opioid-specific harm reduction and facilitators and barriers to harm reduction implementation: a systems perspective.急诊部门如何组织提供阿片类药物特异性伤害减少服务,以及伤害减少实施的促进因素和障碍:系统视角。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Sep 21;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00871-1.
3
The impact of knowledge on attitudes of emergency department staff towards patients with substance related presentations: a quantitative systematic review protocol.知识对急诊科工作人员对待物质相关就诊患者态度的影响:一项定量系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):133-45. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2203.
4
Emergency Department-based Opioid Harm Reduction: Moving Physicians From Willing to Doing.基于急诊科的阿片类药物危害减少:促使医生从愿意行动转变为实际行动。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;23(4):455-65. doi: 10.1111/acem.12910. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
5
Barriers and Facilitators to Harm Reduction for Opioid Use Disorder: A Qualitative Study of People With Lived Experience.阿片类药物使用障碍的减少伤害障碍和促进因素:一项有实际经验的人的定性研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Apr;83(4):340-350. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.020. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
6
Experiences of patients at high risk of opioid overdose accessing emergency department and behavioral health interventions: a qualitative analysis in an urban emergency department.高危阿片类药物过量患者在城市急诊部门接受急诊和行为健康干预的体验:一项定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 18;23(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09387-7.
7
Facilitators and barriers to post-overdose service delivery in Rhode Island emergency departments: A qualitative evaluation.罗得岛州急诊部门提供阿片类药物过量后服务的促进因素和障碍:定性评估。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Nov;130:108411. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108411. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
8
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing medications for opioid use disorder and naloxone distribution in Veterans Affairs emergency departments.在退伍军人事务部急诊科实施阿片类药物使用障碍治疗药物及纳洛酮分发的障碍与促进因素
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):289-298. doi: 10.1111/acem.14683. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
Initiation of Buprenorphine in the Emergency Department: A Survey of Emergency Clinicians.在急诊科开始使用丁丙诺啡:对急诊临床医生的调查。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;25(4):470-476. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18029.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician perspectives on reducing harm and supporting emergency department patients who use drugs.医生对减少伤害及支持急诊科吸毒患者的看法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0327899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327899. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
How an emergency department is organized to provide opioid-specific harm reduction and facilitators and barriers to harm reduction implementation: a systems perspective.急诊部门如何组织提供阿片类药物特异性伤害减少服务,以及伤害减少实施的促进因素和障碍:系统视角。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Sep 21;20(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00871-1.
2
Integration of a community-based harm reduction program into a safety net hospital: a qualitative study.将基于社区的减少伤害项目纳入安全网医院:一项定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Apr 12;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00622-8.
3
Overdose and take-home naloxone in emergency settings: A pilot study examining feasibility of delivering brief interventions addressing overdose prevention with 'take-home naloxone' in emergency departments.在紧急情况下的过量用药和携带纳洛酮回家:一项试点研究,考察在急诊科提供针对预防过量用药的“携带纳洛酮回家”的简短干预措施的可行性。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Aug;34(4):509-518. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13925. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Initiation and Continuation: a Qualitative Study of Patients Who Received Addiction Consultation and Hospital-Based Providers.阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的启动和持续:接受成瘾咨询和医院提供者的患者的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(11):2786-2794. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07305-3. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
5
Facilitators and barriers to post-overdose service delivery in Rhode Island emergency departments: A qualitative evaluation.罗得岛州急诊部门提供阿片类药物过量后服务的促进因素和障碍:定性评估。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Nov;130:108411. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108411. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
6
A qualitative examination of the current management of opioid use disorder and barriers to prescribing buprenorphine in a Canadian emergency department.对加拿大急诊部门阿片类药物使用障碍管理现状及丁丙诺啡处方障碍的定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Apr 15;21(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00443-1.
7
Increasing Naloxone Prescribing in the Emergency Department Through Education and Electronic Medical Record Work-Aids.通过教育和电子病历辅助工具增加急诊科纳洛酮的处方量。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Jun;47(6):364-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
Death after emergency department visits for opioid overdose in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort analysis.不列颠哥伦比亚省因阿片类药物过量急诊就诊后的死亡:一项回顾性队列分析。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Mar 17;9(1):E242-E251. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200169. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
9
A qualitative study of emergency department patients who survived an opioid overdose: Perspectives on treatment and unmet needs.一项对急诊室阿片类药物过量幸存者的定性研究:治疗和未满足需求的观点。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 May;28(5):542-552. doi: 10.1111/acem.14197. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
10
Prescribing Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorders in the ED: A Review of Best Practices, Barriers, and Future Directions.急诊科开具丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类物质使用障碍:最佳实践、障碍及未来方向综述
Open Access Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 14;12:261-274. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S267416. eCollection 2020.

急诊科阿片类药物特异性危害减少策略:医护人员如何提供危害减少措施,以及影响其进行危害减少实践能力的相关因素。

Opioid-specific harm reduction in the emergency department: how staff provide harm reduction and contextual factors that impact their capacity to engage in harm reduction practice.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.

School of Nursing, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, HSD Building A402a, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2024 Sep 18;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01088-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12954-024-01088-6
PMID:39294704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11409625/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency Departments (ED) staff, including nurses and physicians, are most directly involved in the care of people who use unregulated substances, and are ideally positioned to provide harm reduction interventions. Conceptualizing the ED as a complex adaptive system, this paper examines how ED staff experience opioid-specific harm reduction provision and engage in harm reduction practice, including potential facilitators and barriers to engagement.

METHODS

Using a mixed methods approach, ED nurses and physicians completed a self-administered staff survey (n = 99) and one-on-one semi-structured interviews (n = 15). Five additional interviews were completed with clinical leaders. Survey data were analyzed to generate descriptive statistics and to compute scale scores. De-identified interview data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis approach, which was informed by the theory of complex adaptive systems, as well as understandings of harm reduction as both a technical solution and a contextualized social practice. The final analysis involved mixed analysis through integrating both quantitative and qualitative data to generate overarching analytical themes.

RESULTS

Study findings illustrated that, within the context of the ED as a complex adaptive system, three interrelated contextual factors shape the capacity of staff to engage in harm reduction practice, and to implement the full range of opioid-specific harm reduction interventions available. These factors include opportunities to leverage benefits afforded by working collaboratively with colleagues, adequate preparation through receiving the necessary education and training, and support in helping patients establish connections for ongoing care.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for harm reduction provision across all health and social care settings where people who use unregulated opioids access public sector services. In the context of the ED, attention to contextual factors including teamwork, preparedness, and connections is warranted to support that ED staff engage in harm reduction practice.

摘要

背景

急诊部(ED)的工作人员,包括护士和医生,是最直接参与照顾使用未经管制物质的人的人,他们是提供减少伤害干预的理想人选。将 ED 视为复杂自适应系统,本文研究了 ED 工作人员如何体验特定于阿片类药物的减少伤害供应,并参与减少伤害实践,包括参与的潜在促进因素和障碍。

方法

使用混合方法,ED 护士和医生完成了自我管理的员工调查(n=99)和一对一的半结构化访谈(n=15)。还与 5 名临床领导进行了额外的 5 次访谈。对调查数据进行了分析,以生成描述性统计数据和计算量表得分。对匿名访谈数据进行了分析,使用了一种反映性主题分析方法,该方法受到复杂自适应系统理论以及对减少伤害作为一种技术解决方案和一种背景化社会实践的理解的启发。最终的分析涉及通过整合定量和定性数据来生成总体分析主题的混合分析。

结果

研究结果表明,在 ED 作为复杂自适应系统的背景下,三个相互关联的背景因素塑造了员工参与减少伤害实践的能力,并实施了可用的全套特定于阿片类药物的减少伤害干预措施。这些因素包括通过与同事协作利用协作带来的好处的机会,通过接受必要的教育和培训获得足够的准备,以及在帮助患者建立持续护理联系方面的支持。

结论

在人们使用未经管制的阿片类药物获取公共部门服务的所有卫生和社会保健环境中都需要提供减少伤害服务。在 ED 背景下,需要关注包括团队合作、准备和联系在内的背景因素,以支持 ED 工作人员参与减少伤害实践。