Baumeister Moritz, Meyer Markus A
Department of Agriculture, Ecotrophology, and Landscape Development, National and International Nature Conservation, University of Applied Sciences Anhalt, Bernburg, Germany.
Ecosystem Modelling, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Environ Evid. 2024 Jun 2;13(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13750-024-00340-7.
Forest disturbances are projected to increase in intensity and frequency in the upcoming decades. The projected change in disturbance regimes is expected to alter the provision of ecosystem services and affect biodiversity. Both are critical for forest ecosystems to provide livelihoods for human societies. Forest management after natural disturbances shapes successional pathways of forest ecosystems. Therefore, the management of post-disturbance sites deserves critical attention to avoid negative effects of management interventions on ecosystem services and biodiversity. The two most common management interventions after natural disturbances are salvage logging (comparator: no salvage logging) and tree planting (comparator: natural regeneration). This planned systematic map of reviews aims to aggregate the existing evidence syntheses on the implications of common forest management interventions after natural disturbances on successional trajectories with regard to selected ecosystem services and biodiversity. Evidence-based post-disturbance management is highly relevant for protected area management as well as for the management of commercial forests.
We will systematically search the databases Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and the Forest Science Collection of the CABI Digital Library for reviews and meta-analyses (after 2003). We will apply eligibility criteria for review selection and assess the evidence synthesis validity of selected reviews using the most recent version of CEESAT (Collaboration for Environmental Evidence Synthesis Assessment Tool). The results will be displayed in topic subgroups in summary of scope and summary of findings tables.
预计在未来几十年，森林干扰的强度和频率将会增加。干扰状况的预计变化有望改变生态系统服务的提供，并影响生物多样性。这两者对于森林生态系统为人类社会提供生计都至关重要。自然干扰后的森林管理塑造了森林生态系统的演替路径。因此，干扰后场地的管理值得高度关注，以避免管理干预对生态系统服务和生物多样性产生负面影响。自然干扰后两种最常见的管理干预措施是抢救性采伐（对照：不进行抢救性采伐）和植树造林（对照：自然更新）。这一计划中的系统综述地图旨在汇总关于自然干扰后常见森林管理干预措施对选定生态系统服务和生物多样性的演替轨迹影响的现有证据综合。基于证据的干扰后管理对于保护区管理以及商业森林管理都高度相关。
我们将系统地检索Scopus、科学网核心合集以及CABI数字图书馆的森林科学合集等数据库，查找2003年以后的综述和荟萃分析。我们将应用综述选择的纳入标准，并使用最新版的CEESAT（环境证据综合评估工具协作组织）评估选定综述的证据综合有效性。结果将在范围概述和结果概述表的主题子组中展示。
