• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痉挛型脑瘫患儿下肢选择性控制评估中文版的信效度

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the selective control assessment of the lower extremity in children with spastic cerebral palsy.

作者信息

Zhou Chunming, Chen Yijing, Zeng Wenhui, Huang Wujie, Wu Xuefei, Wang Yating, Zhong Jiamin, Cao Jianguo, Huang Meihuan

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Rehabilitation Medicine College, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1458066. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1458066. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1458066
PMID:39296955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11408164/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE) in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP).

METHODS

Forty-five children with spastic CP (mean age 7.29 years, SD 2.87 years, rang 4-16 years) were recruited. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α, while test-retest and inter-rater reliability were evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Construct validity was established through correlation and confirmatory factor analyses. Discriminative validity was assessed by comparing SCALE scores across varying GMFCS levels.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of SCALE demonstrates high internal consistency (Cronbach's = 0.91) and good reliability with ICCs exceeding 0.76 for test-retest and inter-rater assessments. It shows significant correlations with GMFCS ( = -0.76, < 0.001) and Fugl-Meyer scales ( = 0.79, < 0.001), confirming its validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supports a well-fitting model ( /df = 1.58, RMSEA = 0.08, SRMR <0.001, GFI = 0.98, AGFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.98), with the latent variable's AVE at 0.59 and CR at 0.88. Discriminative validity is evident in significant differences across GMFCS levels ( < 0.001), notably between levels I and II, I and III, and I and IV ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of SCALE shows good reliability and validity for assessing lower limb selective movement control in children with spastic cerebral palsy in China.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=205380, identifier ChiCTR2400083880.

摘要

目的

评估中文版下肢选择性控制评估量表(SCALE)在痉挛型脑瘫(CP)儿童中的信度和效度。

方法

招募了45名痉挛型CP儿童(平均年龄7.29岁,标准差2.87岁,年龄范围4 - 16岁)。使用Cronbach's α系数测量内部一致性,使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度和评分者间信度。通过相关性分析和验证性因素分析建立结构效度。通过比较不同GMFCS水平的SCALE评分评估区分效度。

结果

中文版SCALE显示出高内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.91),重测和评分者间评估的ICC超过0.76,具有良好的信度。它与GMFCS(r = -0.76,p < 0.001)和Fugl - Meyer量表(r = 0.79,p < 0.001)显示出显著相关性,证实了其效度。验证性因素分析支持一个拟合良好的模型(χ²/df = 1.58,RMSEA = 0.08,SRMR < 0.001,GFI = 0.98,AGFI = 0.90,CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.98),潜在变量的AVE为0.59,CR为0.88。在不同GMFCS水平之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001),特别是在I级和II级、I级和III级以及I级和IV级之间(p < 0.05),区分效度明显。

结论

中文版SCALE在中国痉挛型脑瘫儿童下肢选择性运动控制评估中显示出良好的信度和效度。

临床试验注册

https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=205380,标识符ChiCTR2400083880。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the selective control assessment of the lower extremity in children with spastic cerebral palsy.痉挛型脑瘫患儿下肢选择性控制评估中文版的信效度
Front Neurol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1458066. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1458066. eCollection 2024.
2
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE) in children with spastic cerebral palsy.土耳其版选择性控制下肢评估量表(SCALE)在痉挛性脑瘫儿童中的信度和效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jan;45(1):106-110. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2022783. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the selective control assessment of the lower extremity tool among patients with spastic cerebral palsy.日本版下肢选择性控制评估工具在痉挛型脑瘫患者中的信度和效度
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Dec;28(12):3316-3319. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3316. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
Reliability and Construct Validity of the Japanese Version of the Posture and Postural Ability Scale in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy.日语版姿势与姿势能力量表在脑瘫患者中的信度和结构效度
Phys Ther Res. 2024;27(2):92-99. doi: 10.1298/ptr.E10287. Epub 2024 May 29.
5
Reliability, validity, and minimal clinically important differences of the Japanese version of the early clinical assessment of balance in children with cerebral palsy.日本版脑性瘫痪儿童早期平衡临床评估的可靠性、有效性和最小临床重要差异。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(23):7283-7289. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1977859. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
6
Reliability and validity tests of the Chinese version of the Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) in tumor survivors.老年机车功能量表中文版(GLFS-25)在肿瘤幸存者中的信效度测试
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 17;10(9):e29604. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29604. eCollection 2024 May 15.
7
Construct validity and reliability of the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity in children with cerebral palsy.脑瘫患儿下肢选择性控制评估的结构效度和信度
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Feb;58(2):167-72. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12805. Epub 2015 May 20.
8
Playfully Assessing Lower Extremity Selective Voluntary Motor Control in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Psychometric Study.趣味性评估脑瘫儿童下肢选择性自主运动控制:心理测量学研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Dec 16;9(4):e39687. doi: 10.2196/39687.
9
Validity and reliability of the 3-meter backward walk test in children with cerebral palsy.脑瘫儿童 3 米后退行走测试的有效性和可靠性。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Aug;123(4):1439-1446. doi: 10.1007/s13760-023-02259-1. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
10
Validation of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the active-empathic listening scale.中文版积极共情倾听量表的信效度验证
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 23;13:938461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.938461. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of the Global Adolescent and Child Physical Activity Questionnaire (GAC-PAQ) in 14 countries: study protocol.全球青少年和儿童身体活动问卷(GAC-PAQ)在 14 个国家的制定和验证:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 24;14(7):e082275. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082275.
2
Correlation between Selective Motor Control of the Lower Extremities and Balance in Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: a randomized controlled trial.痉挛性偏瘫型脑瘫患者下肢选择性运动控制与平衡的相关性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar 5;15(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00636-0.
3
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE) in children with spastic cerebral palsy.
土耳其版选择性控制下肢评估量表(SCALE)在痉挛性脑瘫儿童中的信度和效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jan;45(1):106-110. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2022783. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
4
Selective Motor Control is a Clinical Correlate of Brain Motor Tract Impairment in Children with Spastic Bilateral Cerebral Palsy.选择性运动控制是痉挛性双侧脑瘫儿童脑运动束损伤的临床相关因素。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Nov;42(11):2054-2061. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7272. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Correlation between the Korean Version of the Trunk Control Measurement Scale and the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity Scores in Children with Cerebral Palsy.脑瘫儿童躯干控制测量量表韩国版与下肢选择性控制评估的相关性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 6;57(7):687. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070687.
6
A Systematic Review of Training Methods That May Improve Selective Voluntary Motor Control in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy.对可能改善痉挛型脑瘫患儿选择性自主运动控制的训练方法的系统评价
Front Neurol. 2020 Dec 4;11:572038. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.572038. eCollection 2020.
7
Unmasking the Enigma of Cerebral Palsy: A Traditional Review.揭开脑瘫之谜:传统综述
Cureus. 2020 Oct 17;12(10):e11004. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11004.
8
Cerebral Palsy: Current Opinions on Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification and Treatment Options.脑瘫:关于定义、流行病学、风险因素、分类及治疗选择的当前观点
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Jun 12;16:1505-1518. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S235165. eCollection 2020.
9
Characteristics of selective motor control of the lower extremity in adults with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy.双侧痉挛型脑瘫成人下肢选择性运动控制的特征
J Phys Ther Sci. 2020 May;32(5):348-351. doi: 10.1589/jpts.32.348. Epub 2020 May 1.
10
Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis.验证性因素分析中模型拟合的卡方检验。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Sep;76(9):2209-2211. doi: 10.1111/jan.14399. Epub 2020 May 7.