Suppr超能文献

K-12阶段家庭作业时间与学业成绩之间的关系:一项系统综述。

The relationship between homework time and academic performance among K-12: A systematic review.

作者信息

Guo Liping, Li Jieyun, Xu Zheng, Hu Xiaoling, Liu Chunyan, Xing Xin, Li Xiuxia, White Howard, Yang Kehu

机构信息

School of Basic Medical Sciences, Evidence-based Medicine Centre Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu China.

School of Public Health, Center for Evidence-based Social Sciences Lanzhou University Lanzhou Gansu China.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 18;20(3):e1431. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1431. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Homework is a common educational task given to students around the world. It demands mental exertion, but staying focused can be challenging, especially for K-12 students. Too much homework can increase their cognitive load and mental fatigue, leading to decreased motivation and performance. This can cause boredom with homework and learning. To lessen their load and make homework more effective, it is important to establish the connection between homework duration and academic achievement.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between homework time and academic performance among K-12 students.

SEARCH METHODS

On November 5, 2021, we retrieved articles from a variety sources. Firstly, we searched 10 electronic databases for related publications, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, Business Source Premier, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Journal Storage (JSTOR), Learning and Technology Library (LearnTechLib), OCLC FirstSearch, Social Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science), and Teacher Reference Center. We also searched two publisher platforms: ScienceDirect and Taylor & Francis Online Database. Secondly, we consulted five educational organization website such as, American Educational Research Association, Best Evidence Encyclopedia, Education Endowment Foundation, European Educational Research Association, What Works Clearinghouse, and the Open Grey database for unpublished studies. We then searched Open Dissertations and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global databases to locate the relevant dissertations and theses. Additionally, we hand-searched seven educational journals to identify unpublished documents, reports, and potential studies not indexed in the databases. Lastly, we searched Campbell Library to identify relevant reviews and primary (and nearly eligible studies) in these reviews. We also searched Google Scholar for related studies and checked the citations of eligible studies as well as their bibliographies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies with the following criteria were included: - K-12 school students with no disabilities or not attending special education schools;- Homework assigned regularly by schoolteachers to students to complete during non-school hours;- Different time spent on the homework;- Academic performance was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were academic motivation and the quality of homework;- Treatment-control group design or comparison group design studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full texts of the retrieved records. Our team extracted and coded all relevant information from the studies that met our inclusion criteria. To evaluate the risk of bias, we used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomized controlled trials. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effect of homework on academic achievement as compared to no homework. A funnel plot, trim-and-fill method and Egger's test were used to test for any publication bias. Due to the insufficient data on homework duration and academic achievement, we analyzed these data using qualitative synthesis.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven publications were identified that examined the relationship between homework duration and academic outcomes using an experimental design. Based on their focus, we categorized them into two groups: comparisons of homework with no homework and comparison of homework with less homework. There were 10 articles with 14 independent reports that compared academic performance between students who did homework and those who did not. Overall, the meta-analysis revealed that the students who did homework had better academic performance than that those who did not ( = 14;  = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.66;  = 454.30,  = 71.30%,  = 0.11), especially in arithmetic computation ( = 5;  = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.17-0.75;  = 13.03,  = 69.29%,  = 0.07) and arithmetic problems solving ( = 6;  = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.02-0.33;  = 6.87,  = 27.17%,  = 0.01), but not in arithmetic concepts ( = 3,  = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.22-0.18;  = 1.46,  = 0.00%,  = 0.00). Two experiments explored the effectiveness of homework moderated by homework time. In Koch (1965), the effects of long daily homework (20-30 min) and short daily homework (10-15 min) were compared. The authors found that achievement in arithmetic concepts was higher with long homework assignments every day. Recently, Dolean and Lervag (2021) confirmed the effect of homework on writing skills, and their findings were consistent with those of Koch (1965), who found that increasing time spent on homework was associated with greater writing achievement (average 20 min each time).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Homework could be used as a supplement to enhance the academic performance of primary school students. However, the optimal amount of time they should dedicate each day to homework to achieve the best results remains uncertain. More high-quality experiments are needed to determine the ideal homework duration for these students. Furthermore, additional research is required to understand the impact of homework on secondary school students.

摘要

背景

家庭作业是一项全球范围内常见的给学生布置的教育任务。它需要脑力劳动,但保持专注可能具有挑战性,尤其是对于中小学学生而言。过多的家庭作业会增加他们的认知负荷和精神疲劳,导致学习动力和成绩下降。这可能会使学生对家庭作业和学习产生厌倦情绪。为了减轻他们的负担并使家庭作业更有效,确定家庭作业时长与学业成绩之间的联系很重要。

目的

评估中小学学生的家庭作业时间与学业成绩之间的关系。

检索方法

2021年11月5日,我们从多种来源检索文章。首先,我们在10个电子数据库中搜索相关出版物,包括学术搜索大全、美国心理学会心理学文摘、美国心理学会心理学数据库、商业资源大全、教育资源信息中心、期刊全文数据库、学习与技术图书馆、联机计算机图书馆中心第一检索、社会科学引文索引(科学引文索引)以及教师参考中心。我们还搜索了两个出版商平台:科学Direct和泰勒弗朗西斯在线数据库。其次,我们查阅了五个教育组织网站,如美国教育研究协会、最佳证据百科全书、教育捐赠基金会、欧洲教育研究协会、有效教育策略资料中心以及开放灰色数据库,以查找未发表的研究。然后,我们搜索了开放学位论文数据库和ProQuest全球学位论文数据库,以查找相关的学位论文。此外,我们人工搜索了七种教育期刊以识别未发表的文献、报告以及数据库中未索引的潜在研究。最后,我们搜索了坎贝尔图书馆,以识别这些综述中的相关综述以及原始(和几乎符合条件的研究)。我们还在谷歌学术中搜索相关研究,并检查符合条件的研究的引用及其参考文献。

入选标准

纳入符合以下标准的研究:- 无残疾或未就读特殊教育学校的中小学学生;- 学校教师定期布置给学生在非上课时间完成的家庭作业;- 花在家庭作业上的时间不同;- 学业成绩为主要结果。次要结果为学习动力和家庭作业质量;- 治疗-对照组设计或比较组设计研究。

数据收集与分析

我们审查了检索记录的标题、摘要和全文。我们的团队从符合纳入标准的研究中提取并编码了所有相关信息。为了评估偏倚风险,我们对随机对照试验使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具,对非随机对照试验使用ROBINS-I工具。进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以确定与不做家庭作业相比,家庭作业对学业成绩的影响。使用漏斗图、修剪填充法和Egger检验来检验是否存在发表偏倚。由于关于家庭作业时长和学业成绩的数据不足,我们使用定性综合分析这些数据。

主要结果

确定了11篇使用实验设计研究家庭作业时长与学业成果之间关系的出版物。根据其重点,我们将它们分为两组:家庭作业与无家庭作业的比较以及家庭作业与较少家庭作业的比较。有10篇文章包含14项独立报告,比较了做家庭作业的学生和不做家庭作业的学生之间的学业成绩。总体而言,荟萃分析显示,做家庭作业的学生比不做家庭作业的学生学业成绩更好(=14;=0.45,95%置信区间[CI]:0.24 - 0.66;=454.30,= =71.30%,=0.11),尤其是在算术计算方面(=5;=0.46,95% CI:0.17 - 0.75;=13.03,= =69.29%,=0.07)和算术问题解决方面(=6;=0.17,95% CI:0.02 - 0.33;=6.87,= =27.17%,=0.01),但在算术概念方面并非如此(=3,= -0.02,95% CI:-0.22 - 0.18;=1.46,= = =0.00%,=0.00)。两项实验探讨了由家庭作业时间调节的家庭作业效果。在科赫(1965年)的研究中,比较了每天长时间家庭作业(20 - 30分钟)和短时间家庭作业(10 - 15分钟)的效果。作者发现,每天长时间的家庭作业任务在算术概念方面的成绩更高。最近,多利安和勒瓦格(2021年)证实了家庭作业对写作技能的影响,他们的发现与科赫(1965年)的一致,后者发现增加花在家庭作业上的时间与更高的写作成绩相关(每次平均20分钟)。

作者结论

家庭作业可以用作提高小学生学业成绩的补充手段。然而,他们每天应投入多少时间做家庭作业才能取得最佳效果仍不确定。需要更多高质量的实验来确定这些学生的理想家庭作业时长。此外,还需要进一步研究以了解家庭作业对中学生的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13e/11409198/645df4d76f5f/CL2-20-e1431-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验