Institute for Circumpolar Health Research, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada.
Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 19;19(9):e0310247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310247. eCollection 2024.
Our scoping review sought to describe how Etuaptmumk or Two-Eyed Seeing is used and reported on in Indigenous health research. Using the JBI scoping review methodology, we extracted uses of Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing from 83 articles and then categorized the reported uses of Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing according to Huria et al.'s eight CONSIDER statement domains (governance, prioritization, relationships, methodologies, participation, capacity, analysis and interpretation, and dissemination). We found that while authors used Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing in varied ways and at different stages of their research projects, characterizations of the guiding principle were often insufficiently described or overly simplified. This scoping review intends to contribute to a greater dialogue about how Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing is conceptualized and used in Indigenous health research with the goal of encouraging more intentional reporting of the guiding principle.
我们的范围综述旨在描述在原住民健康研究中如何使用和报告 Etuaptmumk 或 Two-Eyed Seeing。使用 JBI 范围综述方法，我们从 83 篇文章中提取了 Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing 的使用情况，然后根据 Huria 等人的八项 CONSIDER 声明领域（治理、优先级、关系、方法、参与、能力、分析和解释以及传播）对报告的 Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing 使用情况进行分类。我们发现，尽管作者以不同的方式和在研究项目的不同阶段使用 Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing，但对指导原则的描述往往不够充分或过于简化。本次范围综述旨在促进关于在原住民健康研究中如何概念化和使用 Etuaptmumk/Two-Eyed Seeing 的更广泛对话，目的是鼓励更有意地报告指导原则。
