Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 19;19(9):e0310633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310633. eCollection 2024.
Alternative education provision such as Pupil Referral Units support young people who have been excluded from mainstream school settings and often from disadvantaged backgrounds. However, there is limited research to date exploring educators' perceptions of the complex needs of young people in PRUs, and the extent to which PRUs as currently configured can meet such needs.
Between March 2019 and October 2020 twenty-two participants holding various educational roles from five different Pupil Referral Units across London and Southeast England were interviewed. The interviews aimed to explore the participants' experiences of working with students in PRU's and examine some of the challenges that they might encounter. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using Reflexive thematic analysis.
The three identified themes and their sub-themes highlighted the complex needs of these young people and identified significant barriers to effective service provision. The first theme 'Complexities of PRU population' highlighted the challenges that young people in PRUs face and perceived systemic short falls in addressing such complexity. The second theme 'Challenges of the PRU environment' highlights the frustrations that educators experience when it comes to providing adequate support to young people in PRU's, the absence of agency support, and the uncertainty that these educational settings can bring. The third theme 'Peer Group Influences' highlights the impact of peer groups from beyond the classroom on engagement within the classroom.
Despite the clear complex needs of young people in PRUs, staff reported feeling ill-equipped to support these individuals and lacked access to effective inter-agency support. Participants reported that pupils' mental health difficulties were exacerbated by exclusion and reintegration practices, an over-zealous focus on educational outcomes and the impact of gang influences on their school lives. Implications include more specific mental health training for staff working in PRU's, improved inter-agency working and the incorporation of trauma-informed approaches in educational practice.
替代教育提供,如学生转介单位,为那些被主流学校环境排斥的年轻人提供支持,他们往往来自弱势背景。然而,迄今为止,关于教育工作者对学生转介单位中年轻人的复杂需求的看法,以及目前配置的学生转介单位在多大程度上能够满足这些需求的研究有限。
2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 10 月期间,来自伦敦和英格兰东南部五个不同学生转介单位的 22 名参与者担任各种教育角色接受了采访。这些采访旨在探讨参与者在学生转介单位工作的经验,并考察他们可能遇到的一些挑战。半结构化访谈采用反思性主题分析进行分析。
确定的三个主题及其子主题突出了这些年轻人的复杂需求,并确定了有效服务提供的重大障碍。第一个主题“学生转介单位人群的复杂性”突出了学生转介单位的年轻人面临的挑战,并认为系统解决这种复杂性存在不足。第二个主题“学生转介单位环境的挑战”突出了教育工作者在为学生转介单位的年轻人提供足够支持时遇到的挫折、机构支持的缺失,以及这些教育环境带来的不确定性。第三个主题“同伴群体的影响”突出了课堂之外的同伴群体对课堂参与的影响。
尽管学生转介单位的年轻人有明显的复杂需求,但工作人员报告说,他们缺乏支持这些人的能力,也无法获得有效的跨机构支持。参与者报告说,学生的心理健康问题因排斥和再融入实践、对教育成果的过分关注以及帮派影响对他们学校生活的影响而恶化。这意味着包括为学生转介单位的工作人员提供更具体的心理健康培训、改善跨机构合作以及将创伤知情方法纳入教育实践。