Suppr超能文献

物理治疗专业学生的策略性学习策略

Strategic Learning Strategies of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students.

作者信息

Minahan Carrie A, Reynolds Breanna, Martin Jennifer G, Seale Jill

机构信息

Carrie A. Minahan is the board-certified neurological clinical specialist emeritus, director of curriculum, associate professor in the South College at the School of Physical Therapy, 400 Goody's Lane, Knoxville, TN 37922 (

Breanna Reynolds is the board-certified orthopedic clinical specialist, director of assessment and research, associate professor in the South College at the School of Physical Therapy.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Educ. 2024 Dec 1;38(4):311-321. doi: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000345. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of strategic learning strategies has been positively associated with academic performance in several graduate health profession programs. This finding suggests that it may be an important construct to explore in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education. The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) summarizes a student's perception and use of 10 learning and study strategies.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Although the LASSI has limited reporting in DPT education, other health care education programs have shown correlation with academic performance. The purpose of this study was to examine DPT students' early perceptions of strategic learning with descriptive summaries of LASSI data and examine correlations between demographic and admissions-related data.

SUBJECTS

Matriculated DPT students ( n = 294) at a 2-year hybrid program who completed the LASSI at orientation in 2020 and 2021.

METHODS

This was a descriptive study that retrospectively analyzed LASSI scores in entry-level DPT students. LASSI score differences among demographic groups and Spearman's rho correlations between the LASSI, Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores, grade point averages, grit, and emotional intelligence (EI) were explored.

RESULTS

LASSI score means were in the 50th-75th percentile (moderate category) suggesting a need for further development in strategic learning. Group differences in LASSI scores were noted for gender identity (male higher Anxiety management, P < .001; female higher Attitude , P < .001, Time Management , P = .003, and Use of Academic Resources , P = .003), racial-ethnic minoritized group (higher S elf-regulation , P = .013), first-generation college students (higher Attitude , P = .047), physical therapy assistants (higher Information Processing , P = .047), students with a primary language other than English (higher Time Management , P = .046), and older students (higher Anxiety management, P = .026). Weak but significant correlations were identified between LASSI scale and component scores and several admissions variables. Highest correlations were with grit ( Will , ρ = 0.319, P < .001; Concentration , ρ = 0.312, P < .001), EI ( Will , ρ = 0.328, P < .001; Attitude , ρ = 0.302, P < .001; Self-regulation , ρ = 0.382, P < .001; Use of Academic Resources ρ = 0.331, P < .001), and quantitative GRE scores ( Anxiety management, ρ = 0.341, P < .001).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: All LASSI scale scores and components were in the moderate category, potentially indicating a need to coach and develop strategic learning strategies. Group differences in LASSI scores may represent varied student needs. The weak relationship between LASSI scores and admissions variables could suggest that the constructs measured by LASSI are not currently captured through typical DPT admissions practices.

摘要

引言

在多个研究生健康专业项目中,策略性学习策略的使用与学业成绩呈正相关。这一发现表明,在物理治疗博士(DPT)教育中,它可能是一个值得探索的重要概念。学习与学习策略量表(LASSI)总结了学生对10种学习与学习策略的认知和使用情况。

文献综述

尽管LASSI在DPT教育中的报道有限,但其他医疗保健教育项目已显示出与学业成绩的相关性。本研究的目的是通过LASSI数据的描述性总结来考察DPT学生对策略性学习的早期认知,并考察人口统计学数据与录取相关数据之间的相关性。

研究对象

在一个为期两年的混合项目中注册入学的DPT学生(n = 294),他们于2020年和2021年在入学培训时完成了LASSI测试。

方法

这是一项描述性研究,对入学水平的DPT学生的LASSI分数进行回顾性分析。探讨了不同人口统计学群体之间的LASSI分数差异,以及LASSI、研究生入学考试(GRE)分数、平均绩点、毅力和情商(EI)之间的斯皮尔曼等级相关。

结果

LASSI分数均值处于第50至75百分位(中等水平),表明在策略性学习方面需要进一步发展。LASSI分数在性别认同(男性在焦虑管理方面得分更高,P <.001;女性在态度、时间管理和学术资源利用方面得分更高,P <.001,时间管理,P =.003,学术资源利用,P =.003)、少数族裔群体(自我调节得分更高,P =.013)、第一代大学生(态度得分更高,P =.047)、物理治疗助理(信息处理得分更高,P =.047)、母语非英语的学生(时间管理得分更高,P =.046)和年龄较大的学生(焦虑管理得分更高,P =.026)等方面存在组间差异。LASSI量表和分量表得分与几个录取变量之间存在微弱但显著的相关性。相关性最高的是与毅力(意志,ρ = 0.319,P <.001;注意力,ρ = 0.312,P <.001)、EI(意志,ρ = 0.328,P <.001;态度,ρ = 0.302,P <.001;自我调节,ρ = 0.382,P <.001;学术资源利用,ρ = 0.331,P <.001)以及GRE定量分数(焦虑管理,ρ = 0.341,P <.001)。

讨论/结论:所有LASSI量表得分和分量表得分均处于中等水平,这可能表明需要指导和培养策略性学习策略。LASSI分数的组间差异可能代表了学生的不同需求。LASSI分数与录取变量之间的微弱关系可能表明,LASSI所测量的概念目前尚未通过典型的DPT录取程序得到体现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验