• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在调强质子治疗(IMPT)优化中纳入预测的每周解剖结构并减少设置误差的临床优势。

Clinical advantages of incorporating predicted weekly anatomy in IMPT optimization with reduced setup error.

作者信息

Zhang Ying, Chan Mark Ka Heng

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2024 Dec;51(12):9207-9216. doi: 10.1002/mp.17412. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1002/mp.17412
PMID:39298742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11656292/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In head and neck (H&N) cancer treatment, a conventional setup error (SE) of 3mm is often used in robust optimization (cRO3mm). However, cRO3mm may lead to excessive radiation doses to organs at risk (OARs) and does not purposefully compensate for interfractional anatomy variations.

PURPOSE

This study introduces a method using predicted images from an anatomical model and a reduced 1mm SE uncertainty for robust optimization (aRO1mm), aiming to decrease the dose to OARs without affecting the coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV).

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 10 nasopharynx radiotherapy patients. Validation CT scans (vCT) from treatment weeks 1 to 6 were analyzed. A predictive anatomical model, designed to capture the average anatomical changes over time, provided predicted CT images for weeks 1, 3, and 5. We compared three optimization scenarios: (1) aRO1mm, using three predicted images with 1mm setup shift and 3% range uncertainty, (2) cRO3mm, with a robust 3mm setup shift and 3% range uncertainty, and (3) cRO1mm, a robust 1mm setup shift and 3% range uncertainty. The accumulated dose to CTVs and serial organs was evaluated under these uncertainties, while parallel OARs were assessed using the accumulated nominal dose (without errors).

RESULTS

The accumulated volume receiving 94% of the prescribed dose (V94) for CTVs in cRO3mm exceeded 98%, meeting the clinical goal. For high-risk CTV, the minimum V94 was 96.44% in aRO1mm and 94.05% in cRO1mm. For low-risk CTV, these values were 97.68% in aRO1mm and 97.15% in cRO1mm. When comparing aRO1mm to cRO3mm on OARs, aRO1mm reduced normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for grade 2 xerostomia and dysphagia by averages of 3.67% and 1.54%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

aRO1mm lowers the radiation dose to OARs compared to the traditional approach, while maintaining adequate dose coverage on the target area. This method offers an improved strategy for managing uncertainties in radiation therapy planning for H&N cancer, enhancing treatment effectiveness.

摘要

背景

在头颈癌治疗中,稳健优化(cRO3mm)通常采用3毫米的传统摆位误差(SE)。然而,cRO3mm可能导致危及器官(OARs)接受过量辐射剂量,且未针对性地补偿分次间的解剖结构变化。

目的

本研究介绍一种方法,利用解剖模型的预测图像和降低至1毫米的SE不确定性进行稳健优化(aRO1mm),旨在在不影响临床靶区(CTV)覆盖的情况下降低OARs的剂量。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了10例鼻咽癌放疗患者。分析了治疗第1至6周的验证CT扫描(vCT)。一个旨在捕捉随时间变化的平均解剖结构变化的预测解剖模型,提供了第1、3和5周的预测CT图像。我们比较了三种优化方案:(1)aRO1mm,使用三张具有1毫米摆位偏移和3%范围不确定性的预测图像;(2)cRO3mm,具有稳健的3毫米摆位偏移和3%范围不确定性;(3)cRO1mm,具有稳健的1毫米摆位偏移和3%范围不确定性。在这些不确定性条件下评估CTV和系列器官的累积剂量,同时使用累积标称剂量(无误差)评估平行OARs。

结果

cRO3mm中CTV接受94%处方剂量的累积体积(V94)超过98%,达到临床目标。对于高危CTV,aRO1mm中的最小V94为96.44%,cRO1mm中为94.05%。对于低危CTV,这些值在aRO1mm中为97.68%,在cRO1mm中为97.15%。在OARs方面,将aRO1mm与cRO3mm进行比较时,aRO1mm使2级口干和吞咽困难的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)分别平均降低了3.67%和1.54%。

结论

与传统方法相比,aRO1mm降低了OARs的辐射剂量,同时在靶区保持了足够的剂量覆盖。该方法为头颈癌放射治疗计划中的不确定性管理提供了一种改进策略,提高了治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7253/11656292/3476c7de22f9/MP-51-9207-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7253/11656292/f0fd6c564fb3/MP-51-9207-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7253/11656292/b06f48c5d06d/MP-51-9207-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7253/11656292/c4c2c694beab/MP-51-9207-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7253/11656292/3476c7de22f9/MP-51-9207-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7253/11656292/f0fd6c564fb3/MP-51-9207-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7253/11656292/b06f48c5d06d/MP-51-9207-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7253/11656292/c4c2c694beab/MP-51-9207-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7253/11656292/3476c7de22f9/MP-51-9207-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical advantages of incorporating predicted weekly anatomy in IMPT optimization with reduced setup error.在调强质子治疗(IMPT)优化中纳入预测的每周解剖结构并减少设置误差的临床优势。
Med Phys. 2024 Dec;51(12):9207-9216. doi: 10.1002/mp.17412. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Validation of Fully Automated Robust Multicriterial Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer IMPT.头颈部癌症 IMPT 的全自动稳健多标准治疗计划验证。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Jul 1;119(3):968-977. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.034. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
3
Robust optimization incorporating weekly predicted anatomical CTs in IMPT of nasopharyngeal cancer.将每周预测的解剖 CT 纳入鼻咽癌 IMPT 中的鲁棒优化。
Phys Med Biol. 2024 Oct 28;69(21). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad8859.
4
Exploring the dosimetric impact of systematic and random setup uncertainties in robust optimization of head and neck IMPT plans.探索系统和随机摆位不确定性对头颈部调强质子治疗计划稳健优化的剂量学影响。
Phys Med. 2024 Dec;128:104863. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104863. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
5
PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.基于 PTV 的 IMPT 优化,结合了计划风险体积与稳健优化。
Med Phys. 2013 Feb;40(2):021709. doi: 10.1118/1.4774363.
6
Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.量化针对头颈部癌症质子治疗中经典和解剖学稳健优化治疗计划的不同不确定性源的计划稳健性。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Mar;93(1107):20190573. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190573. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
7
Enhancing accuracy in proton therapy: The impact of geometric uncertainty models in head and neck cancer treatment.提高质子治疗的准确性:几何不确定性模型在头颈癌治疗中的影响。
Med Phys. 2025 Jun;52(6):4585-4589. doi: 10.1002/mp.17698. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
8
Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.稳健优化强度调制质子治疗的软斑点敏感性正则化。
Med Phys. 2019 Mar;46(3):1408-1425. doi: 10.1002/mp.13344. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
9
Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.调强适形放疗中因解剖位置、摆位误差及系统误差导致的剂量不确定性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 1;87(5):888-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
10
Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.头颈部癌症中通过概率治疗计划将患者几何变化纳入自适应计划优化的剂量学评估。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jul 15;101(4):985-997. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.03.062. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Updating historical normal tissue dose/volume constraints to current levels of treatment precision and accuracy.将历史正常组织剂量/体积限制更新至当前的治疗精度和准确度水平。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Feb 6;33:100725. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100725. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal timing of re-planning for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy.头颈部自适应放疗再计划的最佳时机。
Radiother Oncol. 2024 May;194:110145. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110145. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
2
Daily Head and Neck Treatment Assessment for Optimal Proton Therapy Planning Robustness.每日进行头颈部治疗评估以优化质子治疗计划的稳健性。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 22;15(14):3719. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143719.
3
Large anatomical changes in head-and-neck cancers - A dosimetric comparison of online and offline adaptive proton therapy.
头颈部癌症的巨大解剖学变化——在线与离线自适应质子治疗的剂量学比较
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023 Mar 31;40:100625. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100625. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Deep learning based synthetic CT from cone beam CT generation for abdominal paediatric radiotherapy.基于深度学习的锥形束 CT 生成腹部儿科放射治疗用合成 CT。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 May 5;68(10):105006. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acc921.
5
A probabilistic deep learning model of inter-fraction anatomical variations in radiotherapy.放疗中分次间解剖变异的概率深度学习模型。
Phys Med Biol. 2023 Apr 10;68(8):085018. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acc71d.
6
A probability model for anatomical robust optimisation in head and neck cancer proton therapy.头颈部癌症质子治疗中解剖稳健优化的概率模型。
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Dec 23;68(1). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aca877.
7
Pre-treatment analysis of non-rigid variations can assist robust intensity-modulated proton therapy plan selection for head and neck patients.治疗前的非刚性变化分析可以辅助对头颈部患者进行稳健的强度调制质子治疗计划选择。
Med Phys. 2022 Dec;49(12):7683-7693. doi: 10.1002/mp.15971. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
8
DIR-based models to predict weekly anatomical changes in head and neck cancer proton therapy.基于剂量的模型预测头颈部癌症质子治疗的每周解剖学变化。
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Apr 15;67(9):095001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5fe2.
9
Evaluation of robustly optimised intensity modulated proton therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.评价适形调强质子治疗鼻咽癌的效果。
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Mar;168:221-228. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.043. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
10
Experimental validation of daily adaptive proton therapy.每日适应性质子治疗的实验验证
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Oct 12;66(20). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac2b84.