• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声心动图筛查心力衰竭和优化起搏器个体的护理途径:一项随机对照试验。

Echocardiographic screening for heart failure and optimization of the care pathway for individuals with pacemakers: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Cardiology, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Nat Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):3303-3309. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03265-3. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1038/s41591-024-03265-3
PMID:39300290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11564098/
Abstract

Individuals with pacemakers are at increased risk of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Whether screening for and optimizing the medical management of LVSD in these individuals can improve clinical outcomes is unknown. In the present study, in a multicenter controlled trial (OPT-PACE), we randomized 1,201 patients (717 men) with a pacemaker to echocardiography screening or usual care. In the screening arm, LVSD was detected in 201 of 600 (34%) patients, who then received management in either primary care or a specialist heart failure (HF) and devices clinic. The primary outcome of the trial was the difference in a composite of time to first HF hospitalization or death. Over 31 months (interquartile range = 30-40 months), the primary outcome occurred in 106 of 600 (18%) patients receiving echocardiography screening, which was not significantly different compared with the occurrence of the primary outcome in 115 of 601 (19%) patients receiving the usual care (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval = 0.69, 1.17). In a prespecified, nonrandomized, exploratory analysis, patients with LVSD managed by the specialist clinic experienced the primary outcome event less frequently than those managed in primary care. The results of this trial indicate that echocardiography screening commonly identifies LVSD in individuals with pacemakers but alone does not alter outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01819662 .

摘要

植入起搏器的个体发生左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)的风险增加。尚不清楚在这些个体中筛查和优化 LVSD 的医学管理是否能改善临床结局。在这项多中心对照试验(OPT-PACE)中,我们将 1201 名(717 名男性)植入起搏器的患者随机分为超声心动图筛查组或常规护理组。在筛查组中,600 名患者中有 201 名(34%)检测到 LVSD,然后他们在初级保健或专科心力衰竭(HF)和器械诊所接受管理。试验的主要结局是首次 HF 住院或死亡的复合终点的差异。在 31 个月(四分位距=30-40 个月)期间,接受超声心动图筛查的 600 名患者中有 106 名(18%)发生了主要结局,与接受常规护理的 601 名患者中有 115 名(19%)发生主要结局相比,差异无统计学意义(风险比=0.89;95%置信区间=0.69,1.17)。在预先指定的非随机探索性分析中,在专科诊所接受管理的 LVSD 患者比在初级保健接受管理的患者发生主要结局事件的频率更低。这项试验的结果表明,超声心动图筛查通常可在植入起搏器的个体中发现 LVSD,但单独筛查并不能改变结局。ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT01819662。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/939089d21c0f/41591_2024_3265_Fig5_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/bb90cbf937a6/41591_2024_3265_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/131b34457724/41591_2024_3265_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/834121ccb99f/41591_2024_3265_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/b16d14dcd992/41591_2024_3265_Fig4_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/939089d21c0f/41591_2024_3265_Fig5_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/bb90cbf937a6/41591_2024_3265_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/131b34457724/41591_2024_3265_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/834121ccb99f/41591_2024_3265_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/b16d14dcd992/41591_2024_3265_Fig4_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11564098/939089d21c0f/41591_2024_3265_Fig5_ESM.jpg

相似文献

1
Echocardiographic screening for heart failure and optimization of the care pathway for individuals with pacemakers: a randomized controlled trial.超声心动图筛查心力衰竭和优化起搏器个体的护理途径:一项随机对照试验。
Nat Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):3303-3309. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03265-3. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
The utility of pocket-sized echocardiography to assess left ventricular systolic function prior to permanent pacemaker implantation.便携式超声心动图在永久起搏器植入术前评估左心室收缩功能的效用。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015 Mar 14;13:10. doi: 10.1186/s12947-015-0004-9.
3
Epidemiology of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Heart Failure in the Framingham Study: An Echocardiographic Study Over 3 Decades.弗雷明汉研究中心左心室收缩功能障碍和心力衰竭的流行病学:一项跨越 3 个十年的超声心动图研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan;11(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Burden of Systolic and Diastolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction Among Hispanics in the United States: Insights From the Echocardiographic Study of Latinos.美国西班牙裔人群中左心室收缩和舒张功能障碍的负担:拉丁裔超声心动图研究的见解
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Apr;9(4):e002733. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002733.
5
Prognosis of all-cause heart failure and borderline left ventricular systolic dysfunction: 5 year mortality follow-up of the Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening Study (ECHOES).全因性心力衰竭和临界左心室收缩功能障碍的预后:英格兰超声心动图心脏筛查研究(ECHOES)的5年死亡率随访
Eur Heart J. 2007 May;28(9):1128-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm102. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
6
Prognostic Relevance of Left Atrial Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭中左心房功能障碍的预后相关性
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Apr;9(4):e002763. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002763.
7
Artificial intelligence guided screening for cardiomyopathies in an obstetric population: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.人工智能引导的产科人群心肌病筛查:一项实用的随机临床试验。
Nat Med. 2024 Oct;30(10):2897-2906. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03243-9. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
8
Patients with long-term permanent pacemakers have a high prevalence of left ventricular dysfunction.长期植入永久性起搏器的患者左心室功能障碍的患病率很高。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Nov;16(11):743-50. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000117.
9
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure, and the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial.左心室收缩功能障碍、心力衰竭以及心房颤动患者的卒中与全身性栓塞风险:来自 ARISTOTLE 试验的新认识。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May;6(3):451-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000143. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
[Epidemiology of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the general population of Germany: results of an echocardiographic study of a large population-based sample].[德国普通人群左心室收缩功能障碍的流行病学:基于大规模人群样本的超声心动图研究结果]
Z Kardiol. 2003 Apr;92(4):294-302. doi: 10.1007/s00392-003-0899-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Integration of implantable device therapy in patients with heart failure. A clinical consensus statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).心力衰竭患者植入式装置治疗的整合。欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心力衰竭协会(HFA)和欧洲心律协会(EHRA)的临床共识声明。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Feb;26(2):483-501. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3150. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.《2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南》2023年聚焦更新
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3627-3639. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195.
3
2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.
2023 年 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS 心脏生理起搏指南:预防和减轻心力衰竭。
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Sep;20(9):e17-e91. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1538. Epub 2023 May 20.
4
Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial.升阶梯治疗急性心力衰竭指南导向的药物治疗的安全性、耐受性和疗效(STRONG-HF):一项多中心、开放标签、随机试验。
Lancet. 2022 Dec 3;400(10367):1938-1952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02076-1. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Guideline-directed medical therapy is similarly effective in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.指南指导的医学治疗在心衰伴轻度射血分数降低中同样有效。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Jan;112(1):111-122. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02053-8. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
6
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).2021年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南:由欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗特别工作组制定,并得到欧洲心律协会(EHRA)的特别贡献。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022 May;75(5):430. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.04.004.
7
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e895-e1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
8
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364.
9
Detrimental Immediate- and Medium-Term Clinical Effects of Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Myocardial Fibrosis.心肌纤维化患者右心室起搏的即刻和中期临床不良影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 May;14(5):e012256. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012256. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
Association of heart failure and its comorbidities with loss of life expectancy.心力衰竭及其合并症与预期寿命损失的关联。
Heart. 2021 Sep;107(17):1417-1421. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317833. Epub 2020 Nov 5.