Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Jan;112(1):111-122. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02053-8. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
Current guidelines recommend that disease-modifying pharmacological therapies may be considered for patients who have heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). We aimed to describe the characteristics, outcomes, provision of pharmacological therapies and dose-related associations with mortality risk in HFmrEF.
We explored data from two prospective observational studies, which permitted the examination of the effects of pharmacological therapies across a broad spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The combined dataset consisted of 2388 unique patients, with a mean age of 73.7 ± 13.2 years of whom 1525 (63.9%) were male. LVEF ranged from 5 to 71% (mean 37.2 ± 12.8%) and 1504 (63.0%) were categorised as having reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 421 (17.6%) as HFmrEF and 463 (19.4%) as preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Patients with HFmrEF more closely resembled HFrEF than HFpEF. Adjusted all-cause mortality risk was lower in HFmrEF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.99); p = 0.040) and in HFpEF (HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.52-0.71); p < 0.001) compared to HFrEF. Adjusted all-cause mortality risk was lower in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF who received the highest doses of beta-blockers or renin-angiotensin inhibitors. These associations were not evident in HFpEF. Once adjusted for relevant confounders, each mg equivalent of bisoprolol (HR 0.95 [95% CI 0.91-1.00]; p = 0.047) and ramipril (HR 0.95 [95%CI 0.90-1.00]; p = 0.044) was associated with incremental reductions in mortality risk in patients with HFmrEF.
Pharmacological therapies were associated with lower mortality risk in HFmrEF, supporting guideline recommendations which extend the indications of these agents to all patients with LVEF < 50%. HFmrEF more closely resembles HFrEF in terms of clinical characteristics and outcomes. Pharmacological therapies are associated with lower mortality risk in HFmrEF and HFrEF, but not in HFpEF.
目前的指南建议,对于射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)患者,可考虑使用疾病修正的药物治疗。我们旨在描述 HFmrEF 的特征、结局、药物治疗的提供情况以及与死亡率风险的剂量相关性。
我们探索了两项前瞻性观察性研究的数据,这些研究允许在广泛的左心室射血分数(LVEF)范围内检查药物治疗的效果。合并数据集包括 2388 名独特的患者,平均年龄为 73.7±13.2 岁,其中 1525 名(63.9%)为男性。LVEF 范围为 5 至 71%(平均 37.2±12.8%),1504 名(63.0%)归类为射血分数降低(HFrEF),421 名(17.6%)为 HFmrEF,463 名(19.4%)为射血分数保留(HFpEF)。HFmrEF 患者更接近 HFrEF,而不是 HFpEF。HFmrEF(风险比 [HR] 0.86(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.74-0.99);p=0.040)和 HFpEF(HR 0.61(95%CI 0.52-0.71);p<0.001)的全因死亡率风险低于 HFrEF。HFmrEF 和 HFrEF 中接受最高剂量β受体阻滞剂或肾素-血管紧张素抑制剂治疗的患者,全因死亡率风险较低。HFpEF 中未出现这些关联。在调整了相关混杂因素后,每毫克等效的比索洛尔(HR 0.95(95%CI 0.91-1.00);p=0.047)和雷米普利(HR 0.95(95%CI 0.90-1.00);p=0.044)与 HFmrEF 患者死亡率风险的降低相关。
HFmrEF 中药物治疗与死亡率风险降低相关,支持将这些药物的适应证扩展到所有 LVEF<50%的患者的指南建议。HFmrEF 在临床特征和结局方面与 HFrEF 更为相似。HFmrEF 和 HFrEF 中药物治疗与死亡率风险降低相关,但 HFpEF 中无此关联。