School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles Route de Lennik, Brussels, 808 1070, Belgium.
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Sep 19;25(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02596-x.
Medicine retailers, considered here as any person or setting dedicated to the sale of retail medicines, fill an important gap in terms of access to healthcare in areas where population are not covered by universal healthcare schemes. In Goma in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, such retailers have proliferated and are consulted as the first port of call by more than half of the population, playing therefore a key role as an alternative source of healthcare for any type of health condition. The objective of this study is to understand people of Goma's rationale for using the medicine retailers over the formal healthcare system.
Twelve focus groups, gathering 147 participants in total, were conducted in four worship communities, covering the most common faiths practised in Goma. Three focus group discussions were organised per worship community: one with fathers, another with mothers, and another with chronic patients and/or highly vulnerable people. We used a qualitative and inductive approach to analyse the participants' practices and perceptions in terms of their use of medicine retailers. We identified central categories explaining the reasons for using medicine retailers and the choice of a specific medicine retailer.
When facing a health problem, most of the participants in our study tended to first buy medicines at medicine retailers because it was cheap, quick, and easily accessible. Most were aware of the risks and limitations of such practices and had developed a number of mitigation strategies in order to reduce those risks: evaluating medicine retailers' expertise; developing a "medical expertise"; and seeking proactively out empathetic care.
People in Goma make a conscious and rational choice when resorting to medicine retailers as it is seen as the least-worst option in a complex situation. In order to reduce the risks, they have developed a number of mitigation strategies. Future research should focus on the organisation of medicine retailers as a professional group to improve their supervision in a sensitive context such as Goma and on modalities to articulate them to the formal health system to guarantee a financial accessibility to healthcare for all.
药品零售商,在此被定义为专门销售零售药品的个人或机构,在那些没有全民医疗保健计划覆盖的地区,填补了医疗保健获取方面的重要空白。在刚果民主共和国的戈马,此类零售商如雨后春笋般涌现,超过一半的人口将其作为首选,将其视为任何类型健康状况的替代医疗保健来源,因此发挥着关键作用。本研究的目的是了解戈马人选择药品零售商而非正规医疗保健系统的原因。
在四个敬拜社区共进行了 12 个焦点小组,总共 147 名参与者。这四个社区涵盖了戈马最常见的信仰。每个敬拜社区组织了三个焦点小组讨论:一个针对父亲,一个针对母亲,另一个针对慢性病患者和/或高度脆弱的人。我们采用定性和归纳方法分析参与者在使用药品零售商方面的实践和看法,确定了解释使用药品零售商的原因和选择特定药品零售商的核心类别。
在面临健康问题时,我们研究中的大多数参与者倾向于首先在药品零售商处购买药品,因为这既便宜、快捷又方便。大多数人意识到这种做法的风险和局限性,并制定了一些缓解策略来降低这些风险:评估药品零售商的专业知识;发展“医学专长”;并积极寻求富有同情心的护理。
戈马人在诉诸药品零售商时做出了有意识和理性的选择,因为这被视为在复杂情况下的次优选择。为了降低风险,他们制定了一些缓解策略。未来的研究应侧重于将药品零售商作为一个专业群体进行组织,以改善在像戈马这样敏感环境中的监管,并探讨将其与正规医疗体系联系起来的方式,以确保所有人都能获得负担得起的医疗保健。