Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Wenling First People's Hospital, No. 333 Chuanan South Road, Chengxi Sub-district, Wenling, Zhejiang Province, 317500, China.
Digital Medicine Center, Pingyu People's Hospital, No. 116 Jiankang Road, Guhuai Sub- district, Pingyu, Henan Province, 463400, China.
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03270-9.
Mechanical ventilation is crucial for patient management in intensive care units, but it comes with complications such as pressure ulcers and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The impact of head-of-bed elevation angles on these complications remains a critical area for investigation.
This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and involved searches across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, conducted on September 19, 2023, with no date or language restrictions. We included randomized controlled trials that compared different head-of-bed elevation angles in adult ICU patients on mechanical ventilation. Data were extracted on study characteristics, quality assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and statistical analyses performed using chi-square tests for heterogeneity and fixed or random-effects models based on heterogeneity results.
Six studies met inclusion criteria out of an initial 601 articles. These studies showed minimal heterogeneity (I = 0.0% for pressure ulcers, p = 0.930; and for VAP, p = 0.797), supporting the use of fixed-effect models. Results indicated that a higher elevation angle (45°) significantly increased the risk of pressure ulcers (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.12-3.37, p < 0.05) and decreased the incidence of VAP compared to a lower angle (30°) (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.84, p < 0.05).
While higher head-of-bed elevation can reduce the risk of VAP in mechanically ventilated patients, it may increase the risk of pressure ulcers. Clinical strategies should carefully balance these outcomes to optimize patient care in ICU settings.
PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024570232.
机械通气是重症监护病房患者管理的关键,但它会带来压疮和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)等并发症。床头抬高角度对这些并发症的影响仍然是一个亟待研究的关键领域。
本系统评价和荟萃分析遵循 PRISMA 指南,于 2023 年 9 月 19 日在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 进行了无日期或语言限制的搜索,纳入了比较机械通气成人 ICU 患者不同床头抬高角度的随机对照试验。提取研究特征数据,使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行质量评估,并根据异质性结果使用卡方检验进行异质性检验,使用固定或随机效应模型进行统计分析。
在最初的 601 篇文章中,有 6 篇研究符合纳入标准。这些研究显示出最小的异质性(压疮的 I²=0.0%,p=0.930;VAP 的 p=0.797),支持使用固定效应模型。结果表明,与较低的角度(30°)相比,较高的角度(45°)显著增加了压疮的风险(OR=1.95,95%CI:1.12-3.37,p<0.05),并降低了 VAP 的发生率(OR=0.51,95%CI:0.31-0.84,p<0.05)。
虽然较高的床头抬高角度可以降低机械通气患者 VAP 的风险,但可能会增加压疮的风险。临床策略应仔细权衡这些结果,以优化 ICU 环境中的患者护理。
PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024570232。