Yamauchi Junji, Raghavan Divya, Imlay Hannah, Jweehan Duha, Oygen Suayp, Marineci Silviana, Remport Adam, Hall Isaac E, Molnar Miklos Z
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Department of Rare Diseases Research, Institute of Medical Science, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Transplant Direct. 2024 Sep 17;10(10):e1707. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001707. eCollection 2024 Oct.
In the United States, universal screening for human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) in deceased organ donors was discontinued in 2009. Since then, the transplant guideline suggests considering targeted screening. However, the outcomes of this change in HTLV screening have not been evaluated.
Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database between 2010 and 2022, we analyzed the HTLV antibody screening frequency and seroprevalence in potential deceased organ donors and their correlations with HTLV infection risks, including race and high-risk behaviors for blood-borne pathogen infection. Although targeted screening has not been established for HTLV, we hypothesized that screening rates should correlate with the proportions of donors with infection risk if screening is targeted. We also evaluated the organ utilization of HTLV-seropositive donors.
Of 130 284 potential organ donors, 22 032 (16.9%) were tested for HTLV antibody. The proportion of donors tested for HTLV varied between Organ Procurement Organizations (median [interquartile range], 3.8% [1.0%-23.2%]; range, 0.2%-99.4%) and was not correlated to HTLV infection risks. There were 48 seropositive donors (0.22%), and at least 1 organ from 42 of these donors (87.5%) was transplanted. The number of organs recovered and transplanted per donor was significantly lower in HTLV-seropositive than in HTLV-negative donors (recovered, 2 [2-3] versus 3 [3-5], < 0.001; transplanted, 2 [1-3] versus 3 [2-4], < 0.001). However, HTLV-1 infection was not attributed as the cause of nonrecovery except for only 1 HTLV-seropositive donor.
HTLV screening practices varied across the United States. Our findings suggest that targeted screening was not performed after the elimination of universal screening.
在美国,2009年停止了对已故器官捐献者进行人类嗜T淋巴细胞病毒(HTLV)的普遍筛查。自那时起,移植指南建议考虑进行针对性筛查。然而,HTLV筛查这一变化的结果尚未得到评估。
利用2010年至2022年器官获取与移植网络数据库,我们分析了潜在已故器官捐献者中HTLV抗体筛查频率和血清阳性率,以及它们与HTLV感染风险的相关性,包括种族和血源性病原体感染的高危行为。尽管尚未确立针对HTLV的针对性筛查,但我们假设,如果进行针对性筛查,筛查率应与有感染风险的捐献者比例相关。我们还评估了HTLV血清阳性捐献者的器官利用率。
在130284名潜在器官捐献者中,22032名(16.9%)接受了HTLV抗体检测。各器官获取组织之间接受HTLV检测的捐献者比例各不相同(中位数[四分位间距],3.8%[1.0%-23.2%];范围,0.2%-99.4%),且与HTLV感染风险无关。有48名血清阳性捐献者(0.22%),其中42名(87.5%)捐献者的至少一个器官被移植。HTLV血清阳性捐献者每捐献者回收和移植的器官数量显著低于HTLV阴性捐献者(回收,2[2-3]对3[3-5],<0.001;移植,2[1-3]对3[2-4],<0.001)。然而,除了仅1名HTLV血清阳性捐献者外,HTLV-1感染未被认定为器官未回收的原因。
美国各地的HTLV筛查做法各不相同。我们的研究结果表明,在取消普遍筛查后未进行针对性筛查。