• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物质供应链中的信息共享和渠道侵占。

Information sharing and channel encroachment in biomass supply chains.

机构信息

College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.

School of Management Engineering, Henan University of Engineering, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 20;19(9):e0310539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310539. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310539
PMID:39302974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11414914/
Abstract

To guarantee the sustainable development of the biomass raw material supply chain, researchers are increasingly focusing on the issue of information asymmetry between biomass power plants and upstream supply chain members. This paper investigates the optimal information sharing strategy for a biomass power plant where farmers choose whether to encroach on the biomass feedstock supply. Using a game theory model, we analyze eight different information sharing scenarios, and the results show that when the encroachment occurs in supply chain channels, information sharing can significantly increase the profits of the entire supply chain. In this case, the power plant should share its demand information with all upstream players to promote the overall benefit of the supply chain. In contrast, when the power plant shares its information only with the middleman, it can maximize its profits, which, however, may not be conducive to the long-term stability of the supply chain. Furthermore, surprisingly, in the absence of channel encroachment, the power plant sharing information with upstream members may harm their profits. This suggests that power plants may need to consider the scope of information sharing more carefully when the farmers choose not to encroach. Finally, we also examine the impact of channel competition intensity on information sharing strategies, and find that when channel competition intensity is low, transparent demand information helps the power plant maximize expected returns. However, in a highly competitive market environment, the power plant should carefully handle information sharing with farmers to avoid damaging their profits.

摘要

为了保证生物质原料供应链的可持续发展,研究人员越来越关注生物质发电厂和上游供应链成员之间的信息不对称问题。本文研究了生物质发电厂的最优信息共享策略,其中农民选择是否侵占生物质原料供应。利用博弈论模型,我们分析了八种不同的信息共享情景,结果表明,在供应链渠道发生侵占时,信息共享可以显著提高整个供应链的利润。在这种情况下,发电厂应该与所有上游参与者共享其需求信息,以促进供应链的整体利益。相比之下,当发电厂仅与中间商共享信息时,它可以最大化自身利润,但这可能不利于供应链的长期稳定。此外,令人惊讶的是,在没有渠道侵占的情况下,发电厂与上游成员共享信息可能会损害他们的利润。这表明,当农民选择不侵占时,发电厂在考虑信息共享范围时可能需要更加谨慎。最后,我们还研究了渠道竞争强度对信息共享策略的影响,发现当渠道竞争强度较低时,透明的需求信息有助于发电厂最大化预期收益。然而,在竞争激烈的市场环境下,发电厂应谨慎处理与农民的信息共享,以免损害他们的利润。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/f11506657c3b/pone.0310539.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/d443e025fd30/pone.0310539.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/d4ea0147b1b9/pone.0310539.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/ade8f6f57420/pone.0310539.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/6af2cd0fe1a0/pone.0310539.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/f11506657c3b/pone.0310539.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/d443e025fd30/pone.0310539.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/d4ea0147b1b9/pone.0310539.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/ade8f6f57420/pone.0310539.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/6af2cd0fe1a0/pone.0310539.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64f2/11414914/f11506657c3b/pone.0310539.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Information sharing and channel encroachment in biomass supply chains.生物质供应链中的信息共享和渠道侵占。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 20;19(9):e0310539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310539. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of Recycler Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance of Construction and Demolition Waste Resource Utilization.回收商信息共享对建筑和拆除废物资源利用供应链绩效的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3878. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073878.
3
To Share or Not to Share? The Role of Retailer's Information Sharing in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain.分享还是不分享?零售商信息共享在闭环供应链中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 18;13:941952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941952. eCollection 2022.
4
Supply chain joint emission reduction differential decisions and coordination considering altruistic behavior and reference low-carbon effect.考虑利他行为和参考低碳效应的供应链联合减排差异决策与协调。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22325-22349. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16901-z. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
5
Vertical value-added cost information sharing in a supply chain.供应链中的垂直增值成本信息共享
Ann Oper Res. 2021 Mar 8:1-34. doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-04021-3.
6
An evolutionary analysis of supply chain collaborative information sharing based on prospect theory.基于前景理论的供应链协同信息共享的进化分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 15;19(3):e0298355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298355. eCollection 2024.
7
Pricing Mechanism With Noncooperative Game and Revenue Sharing Contract in Electricity Market.电力市场中非合作博弈与收益共享契约的定价机制。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2019 Jan;49(1):97-106. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2766171. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
8
Dual Competing Photovoltaic Supply Chains: A Social Welfare Maximization Perspective.双竞争光伏供应链:社会福利最大化视角
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;14(11):1416. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111416.
9
Optimizing strategies for e-waste supply chains under four operation scenarios.四种运营情景下的电子废物供应链优化策略。
Waste Manag. 2021 Apr 1;124:325-338. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
10
Impact of uncertain demand and channel power on dual channel supply chain decisions.不确定需求和渠道权力对双渠道供应链决策的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 15;19(3):e0300386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300386. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
An evolutionary analysis of supply chain collaborative information sharing based on prospect theory.基于前景理论的供应链协同信息共享的进化分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 15;19(3):e0298355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298355. eCollection 2024.
2
Integrated biochar solutions can achieve carbon-neutral staple crop production.综合生物炭解决方案可以实现主食作物的碳中和生产。
Nat Food. 2023 Mar;4(3):236-246. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00694-0. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
Information sharing through digitalisation in decentralised supply chains.分散式供应链中通过数字化实现的信息共享。
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Dec 18:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-05105-4.
4
Simulation Study on Complex Systems of Forest Biomass Power Generation Supply Chain in China.中国森林生物质发电供应链复杂系统仿真研究
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 29;2022:7202352. doi: 10.1155/2022/7202352. eCollection 2022.
5
Implications of near-term mitigation on China's long-term energy transitions for aligning with the Paris goals.近期减缓措施对中国与《巴黎协定》目标相一致的长期能源转型的影响。
Energy Econ. 2020 Aug;90:104865. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104865. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Total and Sustainable Utilization of Biomass Resources: A Perspective.生物质资源的全面与可持续利用:一种视角
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jun 5;8:546. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00546. eCollection 2020.
7
A literature review on operational decisions applied to collaborative supply chains.关于应用于协作供应链的运营决策的文献综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0230152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230152. eCollection 2020.
8
Materials from renewable resources: new properties and functions.来自可再生资源的材料:新特性与功能。
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2019 Oct 21;91(4):e20181160. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201920181160. eCollection 2019.
9
Logistics system design for biomass-to-bioenergy industry with multiple types of feedstocks.具有多种原料的生物质到生物能源产业的物流系统设计。
Bioresour Technol. 2011 Dec;102(23):10936-45. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.121. Epub 2011 Sep 13.