• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用生长大鼠和 INFOGEST 模型评价酵母蛋白相对于动物蛋白和植物蛋白的营养价值。

Evaluation of the nutritional quality of yeast protein in comparison to animal and plant proteins using growing rats and INFOGEST model.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hangkong Road 13, Wuhan 430030, China; Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, MOE Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hangkong Road 13, Wuhan 430030, China.

Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hangkong Road 13, Wuhan 430030, China; Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, MOE Key Lab of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hangkong Road 13, Wuhan 430030, China.

出版信息

Food Chem. 2025 Jan 15;463(Pt 2):141178. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141178. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141178
PMID:39303477
Abstract

Yeast, identified as a microorganism, boasts a considerable protein content, positioning yeast protein as a highly promising alternative in the quest for sustainable protein sources. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the protein quality of yeast protein and compare it with animal proteins (whey concentrate/isolate proteins) and plant proteins (soy, wheat, pea proteins). Notably, yeast protein exhibits the highest ratio of indispensable/dispensable amino acids (IAAs/DAAs, 0.91). However, in both in vivo and in vitro digestion experiments, yeast protein demonstrated lower true protein digestibility (TPD) and true ileal digestibility (TID) compared to other proteins. Despite this, the yeast protein's amino acid score (AAS, 1.37 for >3 years), protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS, 100 % for >3 years), and digestibility-corrected amino acid score (DIAAS, 82.42 % for >3 years) of yeast protein surpassed those of plant proteins, yet remained lower than animal proteins primarily due to its lower digestibility.

摘要

酵母被鉴定为一种微生物,其蛋白质含量相当可观,因此成为可持续蛋白质来源的极具前景的替代品。本研究的主要目的是评估酵母蛋白的蛋白质质量,并将其与动物蛋白(乳清浓缩物/分离蛋白)和植物蛋白(大豆、小麦、豌豆蛋白)进行比较。值得注意的是,酵母蛋白的必需/非必需氨基酸比(IAAs/DAAs,0.91)最高。然而,在体内和体外消化实验中,与其他蛋白质相比,酵母蛋白的真蛋白消化率(TPD)和真回肠消化率(TID)较低。尽管如此,酵母蛋白的氨基酸评分(AAS,>3 岁时为 1.37)、蛋白质消化率校正后的氨基酸评分(PDCAAS,>3 岁时为 100%)和消化率校正后的氨基酸评分(DIAAS,>3 岁时为 82.42%)均超过了植物蛋白,但仍低于动物蛋白,主要是由于其消化率较低。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the nutritional quality of yeast protein in comparison to animal and plant proteins using growing rats and INFOGEST model.利用生长大鼠和 INFOGEST 模型评价酵母蛋白相对于动物蛋白和植物蛋白的营养价值。
Food Chem. 2025 Jan 15;463(Pt 2):141178. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141178. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS).某些乳制品和植物蛋白的可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS)值,可能比使用蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)概念计算出的值,能更好地描述蛋白质质量。
Br J Nutr. 2017 Feb;117(4):490-499. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517000125.
3
Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores and digestible indispensable amino acid scores differentially describe protein quality in growing male rats.蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分和可消化必需氨基酸评分以不同方式描述生长雄性大鼠的蛋白质质量。
J Nutr. 2015 Feb;145(2):372-9. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.195438. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
4
Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) and protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) in oat protein concentrate measured in 20- to 30-kilogram pigs.在20至30千克的猪中测定的燕麦浓缩蛋白中的可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS)和蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)。
J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Jan;98(1):410-414. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8457. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
5
Nutritional Evaluation of Milk-, Plant-, and Insect-Based Protein Materials by Protein Digestibility Using the INFOGEST Digestion Method.采用INFOGEST消化法通过蛋白质消化率对基于牛奶、植物和昆虫的蛋白质原料进行营养评估。
J Agric Food Chem. 2023 Feb 8;71(5):2503-2513. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c07273. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
6
True ileal amino acid digestibility and digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAASs) of plant-based protein foods.植物性蛋白质食物的真回肠氨基酸消化率和可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS)。
Food Chem. 2021 Feb 15;338:128020. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128020. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
7
Investigation of the nutritional quality of raw and processed Canadian faba bean (Vicia faba L.) flours in comparison to pea and soy using a human in vitro gastrointestinal digestion model.采用人体体外胃肠道消化模型比较生的和加工的加拿大菜豆(Vicia faba L.)粉与豌豆和大豆的营养质量。
Food Res Int. 2023 Nov;173(Pt 1):113264. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113264. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
Digestible indispensable amino acid scores of nine cooked cereal grains.九种煮熟的谷物的可消化必需氨基酸评分。
Br J Nutr. 2019 Jan;121(1):30-41. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518003033. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
9
Nutritional quality of rice bran protein in comparison to animal and vegetable protein.与动物蛋白和植物蛋白相比,米糠蛋白的营养品质
Food Chem. 2015 Apr 1;172:766-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.127. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
10
Assessment of Protein Nutritional Quality of Novel Hairless Canary Seed in Comparison to Wheat and Oat Using In Vitro Static Digestion Models.采用体外静态消化模型评估新型无毛金丝雀籽的蛋白质营养质量,并与小麦和燕麦进行比较。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 10;15(6):1347. doi: 10.3390/nu15061347.

引用本文的文献

1
Probiotics and Postbiotics Derived from Saline/Marine Plant-Based Feedstocks.源自盐渍/海洋植物基原料的益生菌和后生元。
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10617-z.
2
Hybridization in Meat-Based Dual Protein Foods: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Consumer Insights.基于肉类的双蛋白食品中的杂交:机制、挑战及消费者洞察
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2025 Jul;24(4):e70216. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.70216.