Suppr超能文献

地方烟草控制政策对无烟体育俱乐部流行率的影响。

Impact of local tobacco control policies on the prevalence of smoke-free sports clubs.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Health. 2024 Dec;237:270-275. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.025. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In absence of national legislation, local governments may stimulate outdoor sports clubs to become smoke-free. However, it is unknown whether and to what extent such efforts are effective in encouraging sports clubs to adopt a smoke-free policy (SFP). The aim of this study was to assess the association between tobacco control policies of municipalities and the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional.

METHODS

Information on Dutch sports clubs (N = 3068) was linked to information on tobacco control policies of municipalities (i.e., "smoking prevention policies", "smoke-free environment policies", and "smoke-free sports policies") (N = 218). Multilevel logistic regression models examined the association between municipal tobacco control policies and the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs, while controlling for sports clubs' characteristics.

RESULTS

We found a positive, dose-response association between tobacco control policies of municipalities and the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs. The odds of having an SFP in place was significantly higher for sports clubs in municipalities with moderate "smoking prevention policies" (OR = 1.85, 95%CI = 1.18-2.89), strong "smoke-free environment policies" (OR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.19-3.20), and strong "smoke-free sports policies" (OR = 1.66, 95%CI = 1.02-2.24) compared to sports clubs in municipalities with no/weak policies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that local tobacco control policies can increase the prevalence of SFPs among outdoor sports clubs. In order to create maximum effect, local policies need to be comprehensive and widely implemented.

摘要

目的

在缺乏国家立法的情况下,地方政府可能会鼓励户外体育俱乐部成为无烟场所。然而,目前尚不清楚这些努力是否以及在何种程度上能够有效地促使体育俱乐部采取无烟政策(SFP)。本研究旨在评估地方政府的烟草控制政策与户外体育俱乐部 SFP 流行率之间的关系。

研究设计

回顾性、横断面研究。

方法

将荷兰体育俱乐部(N=3068)的信息与地方政府的烟草控制政策(即“吸烟预防政策”、“无烟环境政策”和“无烟体育政策”)信息进行链接(N=218)。多水平逻辑回归模型考察了地方政府烟草控制政策与户外体育俱乐部 SFP 流行率之间的关系,同时控制了体育俱乐部的特征。

结果

我们发现地方政府的烟草控制政策与户外体育俱乐部 SFP 流行率之间存在正相关关系,呈剂量反应关系。在有适度“吸烟预防政策”(OR=1.85,95%CI=1.18-2.89)、强有力的“无烟环境政策”(OR=1.95,95%CI=1.19-3.20)和强有力的“无烟体育政策”(OR=1.66,95%CI=1.02-2.24)的地方政府中,实施 SFP 的可能性显著高于没有/弱政策的地方政府。

结论

研究结果表明,地方烟草控制政策可以提高户外体育俱乐部 SFP 的流行率。为了达到最大效果,地方政策需要全面和广泛实施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验