• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不同产地枳实及其混淆品的质量鉴别]

[Quality identification of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus from different origins and their adulterants].

作者信息

Liu Hong-Yu, Xue Bian-Xia, Li Chun, Ou Ze-Min, Wang Zhi-Min, Yi Hong, Liu Xiao-Qian

机构信息

National Engineering Laboratory of Quality Control Technology of Chinese Materia Medica, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100700, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2024 Aug;49(16):4477-4487. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20240509.201.

DOI:10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20240509.201
PMID:39307784
Abstract

Aurantii Fructus Immaturus(AFI) is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine with multiple origins from Citrus aurantium and its legally cultivated variants. With advancements in agricultural biotechnology, many new cultivated varieties have sprung up,leading to an abundance of AFI adulterants and chaos in the herbal medicine markets. This study developed a specific identification method for AFI and its closely related adulterants by examining the appearance trait, content of extract, and multiple ingredients,involving indicators such as the ratio of pulp capsule to cross section diameter(Pc/Cs ratio), the content of extract, and the profile of 11 ingredients. The research finds that:(1) Pc/Cs ratio can conveniently identify adulterants such as Poncirus trifoliata, Ju, and Babagan from the genuine AFI.(2) The extract content can be used to identify adulterants originated from C. wilsonii with C. aurantium.(3) The contents of synephrine in all the samples were in accordance with the Chinese Pharmacopoeia except for the adulterants from P. trifoliata, C. wilsonii, C. aurantium 'Changshanhuyou' and orah mandarins. The synephrine content was high as 1. 40% in some C. sinensis varieties. The mass fraction of hesperidin was over 10. 00% in C. sinensis, while it was below 2. 50% in C. aurantium. C. aurantium contained high levels of naringin(3. 96%-15. 21%) and neo-hesperidin(9. 38%-21. 93%).(4) The compositions of adulterants from P. trifoliata and C. wilsonii were more similar to that of C. aurantium 'Daidai', but with significantly lower neo-hesperidin content(0. 03%-0. 14%) than that in C. aurantium, and they lacked hesperetin and tangeretin. C. maxima(originating from C. maxima) showed closer composition to Choucheng and hybrid originated from Citrus aurantium × Poncirus trifoliata, but had higher hesperidin content(3. 13%) than that in C. aurantium. Ju was closely related to C. sinensis and neither contained naringin nor neo-hesperidin. Hesperidins in Babagan and orah mandarins were similar to that in C. sinensis, with none containing rhoifolin. These quality indicators in combination can accurately distinguish between C. sinensis, C. aurantium, and their closely related adulterants(P. trifoliata, C. wilsonii, C. maxima, orah mandarins and C. reticulata), which are expected to provide a systematic method for quality control of AFI.

摘要

枳实是一种传统的中药材,其来源多样,包括酸橙及其合法栽培变种。随着农业生物技术的发展,许多新的栽培品种涌现出来,导致枳实掺假品大量出现,中药材市场混乱。本研究通过考察外观性状、提取物含量和多种成分,建立了一种枳实及其近缘掺假品的特异性鉴别方法,涉及果肉胶囊与横截面直径之比(Pc/Cs比)、提取物含量和11种成分的图谱等指标。研究发现:(1)Pc/Cs比可方便地从正品枳实中鉴别出枳壳、橘和八布柑等掺假品。(2)提取物含量可用于鉴别起源于香橙的掺假品与酸橙。(3)除了来自枳壳、香橙、“常山胡柚”和奥兰多橘的掺假品外,所有样品中的辛弗林含量均符合《中国药典》规定。一些甜橙品种中的辛弗林含量高达1.40%。甜橙中橙皮苷的质量分数超过10.00%,而酸橙中则低于2.50%。酸橙中柚皮苷(3.96%-15.21%)和新橙皮苷(9.38%-21.93%)含量较高。(4)枳壳和香橙的掺假品组成与代代酸橙更为相似,但新橙皮苷含量(0.03%-0.14%)明显低于酸橙,且不含橙皮素和川陈皮素。柚(源自柚)的组成与丑橙和酸橙×枳壳杂交种更为接近,但橙皮苷含量(3.13%)高于酸橙。橘与甜橙关系密切,既不含柚皮苷也不含新橙皮苷。八布柑和奥兰多橘中的橙皮苷与甜橙中的相似,均不含异鼠李素橙皮苷。这些质量指标相结合,可准确区分甜橙、酸橙及其近缘掺假品(枳壳、香橙、柚、奥兰多橘和橘),有望为枳实的质量控制提供一种系统方法。

相似文献

1
[Quality identification of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus from different origins and their adulterants].[不同产地枳实及其混淆品的质量鉴别]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2024 Aug;49(16):4477-4487. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20240509.201.
2
Identification and Comparison of Constituents of Aurantii Fructus and Aurantii Fructus Immaturus by UFLC-DAD-Triple TOF-MS/MS.采用 UFLC-DAD-Triple TOF-MS/MS 法鉴定并比较了枳实与枳实未成熟果实的成分。
Molecules. 2018 Mar 30;23(4):803. doi: 10.3390/molecules23040803.
3
Origin identification on the commercial samples of Aurantii Fructus.枳壳商业样品的产地鉴定
J Sep Sci. 2007 Jun;30(9):1235-41. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200600522.
4
[Determination of three chemical components in Fructus aurantii immaturus].[枳实中三种化学成分的测定]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2006 Sep;31(17):1425-7.
5
[Comparison between peel and pulp of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus by UPLC fingerprint and multicomponent quantitative analysis].[枳实果皮与果肉的超高效液相色谱指纹图谱及多成分定量分析比较]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021 Sep;46(17):4446-4455. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20210618.203.
6
[Determination of hesperidin and naringin in Fructus Aurantii Immaturus and Fructus Aurantii by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography].反相高效液相色谱法测定枳实和枳壳中橙皮苷和柚皮苷的含量
Se Pu. 2002 Nov;20(6):585-6.
7
[Study on HPLC fingerprint and chemical constituent difference of different species of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus].不同品种枳实的高效液相色谱指纹图谱及化学成分差异研究
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2016 Sep;41(17):3272-3278. doi: 10.4268/cjcmm20161725.
8
Comparison of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus and Aurantii Fructus based on multiple chromatographic analysis and chemometrics methods.基于多种色谱分析和化学计量学方法对枳实和枳壳的比较
J Chromatogr A. 2016 Oct 21;1469:96-107. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.09.061. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Differentiation of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus from Poniciri Trifoliatae Fructus Immaturus using flow-injection mass spectrometric (FIMS) metabolic fingerprinting method combined with chemometrics.采用流动注射质谱(FIMS)代谢指纹图谱法结合化学计量学对枳实与枳壳进行鉴别。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015 Mar 25;107:251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.12.035. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
10
Classification of Aurantii Fructus samples by multivariate analysis.通过多变量分析对枳壳样品进行分类。
J Sep Sci. 2007 Aug;30(12):1827-32. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200700016.