Suppr超能文献

针对程序和项目设计人员的学习成果评估指南——ETPLAS 工作组报告

Guidance on the assessment of learning outcomes for those designing procedures and projects - Report of an ETPLAS Working Group.

作者信息

Dontas Ismene A, Fry Derek J, Lewis David I, Applebee Kenneth, Fentener van Vlissingen Martje, Marinou Katerina, Schenkel Johannes

机构信息

Laboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Lab Anim. 2024 Dec;58(6):626-639. doi: 10.1177/00236772241244527. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

Abstract

This document provides assessment criteria for evaluation of each of the Learning Outcomes of the Modules specified (in addition to the Core Modules) for those designing procedures and projects in the Education and Training Framework guidance document by the European Commission and endorsed by the Member States Competent Authorities. This Working Group was tasked to produce these criteria by the Education & Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science, which was funded by the European Commission to this aim. The assessment criteria address knowledge and skills (including critical thinking) expected to be acquired during education and training of persons preparing to design research procedures and projects using animals under the scope of Directive 2010/63/EU. Recognizing the diversity of expertise and experiences of those being educated and trained, we provide two levels of attainment, an ideal response and one that would be acceptable for each Learning Outcome. The balance between ideal and acceptable could be decided by the particular course providers and/or assessors, according to their local requirements. We envisage that the use of these assessment criteria by training providers and accrediting or approving bodies will help harmonize the education and training for those who will design procedures and projects using animals for scientific purposes. In Europe, this may also contribute to mutual recognition of training, and facilitate free movement of scientists.

摘要

本文件为欧盟委员会教育与培训框架指导文件(除核心模块外)中指定模块的每个学习成果评估提供了标准,该指导文件已获成员国主管当局认可。本工作组由欧盟委员会资助的实验动物科学教育与培训平台负责制定这些标准。评估标准涉及在根据2010/63/EU指令范围准备设计使用动物的研究程序和项目的人员的教育和培训过程中预期获得的知识和技能(包括批判性思维)。认识到接受教育和培训人员的专业知识和经验的多样性,我们为每个学习成果提供了两个达成水平,即理想回答和可接受回答。理想回答和可接受回答之间的平衡可由特定课程提供者和/或评估者根据当地要求决定。我们设想,培训提供者以及认证或审批机构使用这些评估标准将有助于协调为出于科学目的设计使用动物的程序和项目的人员的教育和培训。在欧洲,这也可能有助于培训的相互认可,并促进科学家的自由流动。

相似文献

7
Reduction through education: the insight of a trainer.通过教育实现减少:一位培训师的见解。
Altern Lab Anim. 2004 Sep;32 Suppl 2:1-4. doi: 10.1177/026119290403202s02.
9
Strategies for the assessment of competence in laboratory animal science courses.
Lab Anim (NY). 2014 Oct;43(10):359-63. doi: 10.1038/laban.569.
10
Virtual Reality in Biomedical Education in the sense of the 3Rs.虚拟现实在生物医学教育中的 3R 意义。
Lab Anim. 2023 Apr;57(2):160-169. doi: 10.1177/00236772221128127. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Education in laboratory animal science and the 3Rs.实验动物科学与3R原则教育
Lab Anim. 2023 Apr;57(2):109-111. doi: 10.1177/00236772231162166. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
The development of competency frameworks in healthcare professions: a scoping review.医疗保健专业能力框架的发展:范围综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Oct;25(4):913-987. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09946-w. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
9
Defining and assessing professional competence.界定与评估专业能力。
JAMA. 2002 Jan 9;287(2):226-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.226.
10
The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.临床技能/能力/表现的评估。
Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S63-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验