Gomes Rebekah Natalie, Ford Bryan S, Tabak Rachel G, Brownson Ross C, Malone Sara, Padek Maggie, Glasgow Russell E, Rabin Borsika
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA.
Colorado Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control (COISC3), Aurora, CO USA.
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2024;4(3):296-308. doi: 10.1007/s43477-024-00125-7. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
Dissemination and Implementation science is dedicated to increasing the speed of evidence-based research translated into practice as guided by one or multiple D&I theories, models, and frameworks. The Dissemination and Implementation Models in Health Research and Practice web tool guides users on how to plan, select, combine, adapt, use, and assess theories, models, and frameworks. This paper describes usability testing to update the web tool. Iterative user testing was conducted with implementation science research and clinical participants to facilitate updates and optimize the functionality of the tool. A multi-step protocol involved quantitative and qualitative data collection including a survey, interviews, and a usability testing session. Data from the pre-testing surveys were summarized as frequencies. Data from the usability testing sessions were analyzed using a hybrid adapted deductive rapid matrix qualitative analysis. Data from the interviews were analyzed by deductive a priori coding. Fifteen interviewees represented different research and clinical groups and levels of expertise utilizing D&I TMFs. Participants were purposively selected to represent a range of disciplines and D&I expertise, all invited via one-time email. The 847 total interview comments were reduced by similarity to 259 comments, and 142 were feasible changes fitting the priorities of the web tool. Changes to content, format, and functionality are described in this paper. The iterative usability testing elicited improvements to the web tool including adding more examples, definitions, visuals, and tutorials and simplifying the written content. The web tool remains flexible for additions concerning health equity, de-implementation, and other issues.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-024-00125-7.
传播与实施科学致力于提高循证研究转化为实践的速度，这一过程由一种或多种传播与实施（D&I）理论、模型和框架指导。《健康研究与实践中的传播与实施模型》网络工具指导用户如何规划、选择、组合、调整、使用和评估理论、模型和框架。本文描述了为更新该网络工具而进行的可用性测试。与实施科学研究人员和临床参与者进行了迭代用户测试，以促进更新并优化工具的功能。一个多步骤协议涉及定量和定性数据收集，包括一项调查、访谈和一次可用性测试环节。预测试调查的数据以频率进行汇总。可用性测试环节的数据使用混合改编的演绎快速矩阵定性分析进行分析。访谈数据通过演绎先验编码进行分析。15名受访者代表了利用传播与实施理论、模型和框架的不同研究和临床群体以及专业水平。参与者是经过有目的地挑选，以代表一系列学科和传播与实施专业知识，均通过一次性电子邮件邀请。总共847条访谈评论通过相似性减少到259条评论，其中142条是符合网络工具优先级的可行更改。本文描述了内容、格式和功能方面的更改。迭代可用性测试对网络工具进行了改进，包括添加更多示例、定义、视觉效果和教程，并简化书面内容。该网络工具在涉及健康公平、去实施及其他问题的补充方面仍保持灵活性。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s43477-024-00125-7获取的补充材料。
