Liefgreen Alice, Weinstein Netta, Wachter Sandra, Mittelstadt Brent
Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law, University of Swansea, Swansea, SA2 8PP UK.
School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights Road, Reading, RG6 6AL UK.
AI Soc. 2024;39(5):2183-2199. doi: 10.1007/s00146-023-01684-3. Epub 2023 May 20.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly relied upon by clinicians for making diagnostic and treatment decisions, playing an important role in imaging, diagnosis, risk analysis, lifestyle monitoring, and health information management. While research has identified biases in healthcare AI systems and proposed technical solutions to address these, we argue that effective solutions require human engagement. Furthermore, there is a lack of research on how to motivate the adoption of these solutions and promote investment in designing AI systems that align with values such as transparency and fairness from the outset. Drawing on insights from psychological theories, we assert the need to understand the values that underlie decisions made by individuals involved in creating and deploying AI systems. We describe how this understanding can be leveraged to increase engagement with de-biasing and fairness-enhancing practices within the AI healthcare industry, ultimately leading to sustained behavioral change via autonomy-supportive communication strategies rooted in motivational and social psychology theories. In developing these pathways to engagement, we consider the norms and needs that govern the AI healthcare domain, and we evaluate incentives for maintaining the status quo against economic, legal, and social incentives for behavior change in line with transparency and fairness values.
临床医生越来越依赖人工智能(AI)来做出诊断和治疗决策,人工智能在成像、诊断、风险分析、生活方式监测和健康信息管理中发挥着重要作用。虽然研究已经确定了医疗保健人工智能系统中的偏差,并提出了技术解决方案来解决这些问题,但我们认为有效的解决方案需要人的参与。此外,关于如何激励采用这些解决方案以及如何促进对从一开始就符合透明度和公平性等价值观的人工智能系统设计进行投资的研究还很缺乏。借鉴心理学理论的见解,我们主张有必要了解参与创建和部署人工智能系统的个人决策所依据的价值观。我们描述了如何利用这种理解来增加人工智能医疗行业内部对去偏差和增强公平性实践的参与度,最终通过基于动机和社会心理学理论的自主性支持沟通策略实现持续的行为改变。在开发这些参与途径时,我们考虑了管理人工智能医疗领域的规范和需求,并根据符合透明度和公平性价值观的行为改变的经济、法律和社会激励措施,评估维持现状的激励措施。