Ali Nurshad, Debernardi Silvana, Kurotova Evelyn, Tajbakhsh Jian, Gupta Nirdesh K, Pandol Stephen J, Wilson Patrick, Pereira Stephen P, Greenhalf Bill, Blyuss Oleg, Crnogorac-Jurcevic Tatjana
Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
3rd Street Diagnostics, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;14:1450326. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1450326. eCollection 2024.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Up to now, no specific screening or diagnostic tests are available for early PDAC detection. As a result, most patients are diagnosed with advanced or metastatic disease, which leads to a poor prognosis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of urinary CRP (uCRP) alone and in combination with our previously established urine biomarker panel (REG1B, LYVE1 and TFF1) for early detection of PDAC. A total of 534 urine samples from multiple centres were analysed: 93 from healthy individuals, 265 from patients with benign hepatobiliary diseases and 176 from PDAC patients. The uCRP and the urinary biomarker panel were assessed using commercial ELISA assays, while plasma CA19-9 and blood CRP (bCRP) were measured using Roche Cobas platform. Multiple logistic regression and nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. An internal validation approach was applied, and the validated AUC estimators were reported to ensure accuracy. A significant difference was observed in the medians of uCRP between healthy and benign controls and PDAC sample groups (p < 0.001). uCRP levels were not dependent on gender and age, as well as cancer stage. When uCRP was combined with the urinary biomarker panel, it achieved AUCs of 0.878 (95% CI: 0.802-0.931), 0.798 (95% CI: 0.738-0.859) and 0.813 (95% CI: 0.758-0.869) in healthy vs PDAC, benign vs PDAC and healthy and benign vs PDAC sample groups, respectively. However, adding plasma CA19-9 to the urinary biomarker panel yielded a better performance, with AUCs of 0.978 (95% CI: 0.959-0.996), 0.911 (95% CI: 0.873-0.949) and 0.919 (95% CI: 0.883-0.955) in the healthy vs PDAC, benign vs PDAC and healthy and benign vs PDAC comparisons, respectively. In conclusion, we show that measuring CRP in urine is a feasible analytical method, and that uCRP could potentially be a promising biomarker in various diseases including other cancer types.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一。到目前为止,尚无用于早期检测PDAC的特异性筛查或诊断测试。因此,大多数患者被诊断为晚期或转移性疾病,预后较差。在本研究中,我们旨在评估单独检测尿CRP(uCRP)以及将其与我们之前建立的尿液生物标志物组合(REG1B、LYVE1和TFF1)用于早期检测PDAC的诊断价值。共分析了来自多个中心的534份尿液样本:93份来自健康个体,265份来自良性肝胆疾病患者,176份来自PDAC患者。使用商业ELISA测定法评估uCRP和尿液生物标志物组合,同时使用罗氏Cobas平台测量血浆CA19-9和血CRP(bCRP)。采用多元逻辑回归和非参数Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计分析。应用内部验证方法,并报告经过验证的AUC估计值以确保准确性。在健康对照组、良性对照组和PDAC样本组之间观察到uCRP中位数存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。uCRP水平不依赖于性别、年龄以及癌症分期。当uCRP与尿液生物标志物组合联合使用时,在健康组与PDAC组、良性组与PDAC组以及健康和良性组与PDAC组的比较中,其AUC分别为0.878(95%CI:0.802-0.931)、0.798(95%CI:0.738-0.859)和0.813(95%CI:0.758-0.869)。然而,将血浆CA19-9添加到尿液生物标志物组合中表现更佳,在健康组与PDAC组、良性组与PDAC组以及健康和良性组与PDAC组的比较中,AUC分别为0.978(95%CI:0.959-0.996)、0.911(95%CI:0.873-0.949)和0.919(95%CI:0.883-0.955)。总之,我们表明检测尿液中的CRP是一种可行的分析方法,并且uCRP可能是包括其他癌症类型在内的各种疾病中有前景的生物标志物。