Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Environment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Ann Glob Health. 2024 Sep 18;90(1):57. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4458. eCollection 2024.
The impacts of climate change are recognised as a key challenge of the 21st century. By 2030, Sub-Saharan Africa is projected to have the globally highest burden of disease due to climate change. This study aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) of the Southern African Development Community (SADC), a sub-region under-represented at a global level, in addressing current and future climate change-related health impacts. It specifically assesses the NAPs of Botswana, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. A thorough review was conducted, analysing articles, government reports, and national communications related to NAPs and climate change health outcomes in the selected countries. Sources were evaluated against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All five countries prioritised health in their NAPs; however, health departments were excluded from assessments in two of the countries. Although health surveillance and early warning systems were included in the NAPs, there was limited evidence of their integration into broader climate, health, economic, and labour policies. National climate change focal points were identified, but governance and implementation at district and local levels were not well-documented. This review highlighted a need for greater inclusion of Indigenous and locally led knowledge. Common barriers identified included the lack of data with appropriate frequency and scale. Governance and implementation difficulties were also identified in all five countries; these difficulties included both a lack of coordination and a lack of institutional capacity. These challenges, especially a lack of political will to address the compound impacts of altered climate and health on all earth systems, are also found at the regional level. National strategies and implementation programs in SADC countries need to be agile in their ability to scale and adapt, yet they also need to include measurable actions and timeframes. Given the shared climate and health trends and the interconnected socio-economic, environmental, and political landscape, there is significant potential for regional coordination to address cross-border climate change impacts and to optimise resource use.
气候变化的影响被认为是 21 世纪的主要挑战之一。到 2030 年,撒哈拉以南非洲预计将成为因气候变化而患病负担最重的地区。本研究旨在评估南部非洲发展共同体(南共体)国家适应计划(NAP)在应对当前和未来与气候变化相关的健康影响方面的优势和劣势,该地区在全球层面代表性不足。它特别评估了博茨瓦纳、莫桑比克、纳米比亚、南非和津巴布韦的 NAP。进行了彻底的审查,分析了与 NAP 和选定国家与气候变化相关的健康结果有关的文章、政府报告和国家信息通报。根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准评估了来源。所有五个国家都在其 NAP 中优先考虑健康问题;然而,在其中两个国家,卫生部门被排除在评估之外。尽管 NAP 中包含了卫生监测和早期预警系统,但将其纳入更广泛的气候、卫生、经济和劳工政策的证据有限。确定了国家气候变化联络点,但在区和地方各级的治理和执行情况记录不佳。本审查强调需要更多地纳入土著和地方主导的知识。确定的共同障碍包括缺乏具有适当频率和规模的数据。所有五个国家都存在治理和执行方面的困难;这些困难包括协调不足和机构能力不足。这些挑战,尤其是缺乏解决气候变化和健康对所有地球系统的综合影响的政治意愿,在区域一级也存在。南共体国家的国家战略和实施计划需要具备灵活调整规模和适应的能力,但也需要包括可衡量的行动和时间表。鉴于共同的气候和健康趋势以及相互关联的社会经济、环境和政治格局,区域协调具有很大的潜力,可以解决跨境气候变化影响,并优化资源利用。