• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二十国集团国家绿色发展水平绩效评估:一个动态评估框架。

Assessment of green development level performance in G20 countries: A dynamic evaluation framework.

作者信息

Almulhim Tarifa

机构信息

Department of Quantitative Methods, School of Business, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Sep 7;10(18):e37622. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37622. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37622
PMID:39309853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11416487/
Abstract

To achieve sustainable development goals and foster future prosperity globally, the promotion of green development is essential. Nevertheless, persistent regional disparities in green development among the G20 nations stem from differing economic and environmental conditions in dynamic contexts. In light of these conditions, it is essential for governments to evaluate their country's current green development performance in comparison with higher-performing nations and to learn from their experiences. This study introduces a new dynamic evaluation framework that integrates the importance of evaluation indicators using the dynamic entropy weighting method, a Dynamic Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution method, and principal component analysis. This framework serves as a tool for G20 countries to assess their green development levels between 2015 and 2021. A key contribution of this study is the facilitation of the G20's ability to implement relevant reform measures and monitor green development progress in a dynamic environment. This framework can serve as a model for similar evaluations in other regions globally. The study's main findings indicate that G20 countries with high levels of green development possess strong economic foundations and prioritise the balanced development of their economies, societies, environments, and innovation.

摘要

为实现全球可持续发展目标并促进未来繁荣,推动绿色发展至关重要。然而,二十国集团(G20)国家之间在绿色发展方面持续存在的地区差异源于动态背景下不同的经济和环境状况。鉴于这些情况,各国政府必须将本国当前的绿色发展表现与表现更优的国家进行比较,并借鉴它们的经验。本研究引入了一个新的动态评估框架,该框架使用动态熵权法、理想解法相似排序动态技术和主成分分析来整合评估指标的重要性。这个框架作为一种工具,供G20国家评估其2015年至2021年期间的绿色发展水平。本研究的一个关键贡献在于,它有助于G20在动态环境中实施相关改革措施并监测绿色发展进展。这个框架可以作为全球其他地区类似评估的一个范例。该研究的主要发现表明,绿色发展水平较高的G20国家拥有强大的经济基础,并优先考虑经济、社会、环境和创新的平衡发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4d/11416487/2f0eceec094e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4d/11416487/82ecd7bd78c0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4d/11416487/c5efbcb6dc1f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4d/11416487/3396a5fc313b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4d/11416487/2f0eceec094e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4d/11416487/82ecd7bd78c0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4d/11416487/c5efbcb6dc1f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4d/11416487/3396a5fc313b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e4d/11416487/2f0eceec094e/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of green development level performance in G20 countries: A dynamic evaluation framework.二十国集团国家绿色发展水平绩效评估:一个动态评估框架。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 7;10(18):e37622. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37622. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Green transition and economic growth in G20 countries: evidence from disaggregated energy sources.G20 国家的绿色转型与经济增长:来自能源细分来源的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(40):92206-92223. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28781-6. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
The mediating role of ICTs in the relationship between international tourism and environmental degradation: fit as a fiddle.信息通信技术在国际旅游业与环境退化关系中的中介作用:十分健康。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(45):63769-63783. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10954-2. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
5
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
6
The greenhouse effect of the agriculture-economic growth-renewable energy nexus: Evidence from G20 countries.农业-经济增长-可再生能源关系的温室效应:来自二十国集团国家的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 25;671:722-731. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.336. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
Assessing the environmental sustainability gap in G20 economies: The roles of economic growth, energy mix, foreign direct investment, and population.评估二十国集团经济体中的环境可持续性差距:经济增长、能源结构、外国直接投资和人口的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 16;10(4):e26535. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26535. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
8
Impact of financial inclusion and globalization on environmental quality: evidence from G20 economies.金融包容性和全球化对环境质量的影响:来自 20 国集团经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):61265-61276. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19618-9. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
9
Synerging Sustainable Development Goals-can clean energy (green) deliver UN-SDG geared towards socio-economic-environment objectives in emerging BRICS?协同可持续发展目标——清洁能源(绿色)能否助力新兴金砖国家实现联合国可持续发展目标所提出的社会经济环境目标?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(43):98470-98489. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29209-x. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
Does green innovation promote environmental efficiency from a global perspective? A hybrid approach (fuzzy DEA-SEM-ANN).从全球视角看,绿色创新是否能促进环境效率?一种混合方法(模糊数据包络分析-结构方程模型-人工神经网络)
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(47):104432-104449. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29761-6. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Selective Inference for Hierarchical Clustering.层次聚类的选择性推断
J Am Stat Assoc. 2024;119(545):332-342. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2116331. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
2
Analyzing the contribution of renewable energy and natural resources for sustainability in G-20 countries: How gross capital formation impacts ecological footprints.分析二十国集团国家可再生能源和自然资源对可持续发展的贡献:总资本形成如何影响生态足迹。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 9;9(8):e18882. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18882. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Green economy performance and sustainable development achievement: empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia.
绿色经济绩效与可持续发展成就:来自沙特阿拉伯的实证证据。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022 Oct 27:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02722-8.
4
Toward Sustainable Development: Unleashing the Mechanism Among International Technology Spillover, Institutional Quality, and Green Innovation Capability.迈向可持续发展:释放国际技术溢出、制度质量与绿色创新能力之间的机制
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 29;13:912355. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912355. eCollection 2022.