The diagnostic value of histogram analysis of DWI and DKI for the mismatch repair status of rectal adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic value of histogram analysis derived from diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating the mismatch repair (MMR) status of rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

DWI and DKI were performed in 124 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, which were divided into deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) group and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) group. The patients' general clinical information, pathology and image characteristics were compared. The histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion kurtosis (K) and diffusion coefficient (D)derived from DWI and DKI at b values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm were calculated. The diagnostic efficacy of quantitative parameters for MMR in rectal adenocarcinoma was compared.

RESULTS

The mean, 50th, 75th and 90th in ADC quantitative parameters of dMMR group were lower when the b value was 2000 s/mm (all  < 0.05). With b value of 1000 s/mm, the 10th, 25th, and 50th in the dMMR group were lower, and the skewness was higher (all  < 0.05). D values (10th, 25th and 50th) derived from DKI quantitative parameters were lower in the dMMR group. The K values (75th, 90th and Kskewness) were higher in the dMMR group, while Kkurtosis was lower (all  < 0.05). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ADC75th(b = 2000 s/mm), ADCskewness (b = 1000 s/mm) and Kskewness were the statistical significant parameters ( = 0.014, 0.036 and 0.002, respectively), and the AUC values were 0.713, 0.818 and 0.835, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Histogram analysis derived from DWI and DKI can be good predictor of MMR. Kskewness is the strongest independent factor for predicting MMR.